Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MV Dali Lost Propulsion Before Crashing Into Baltimore Bridge; Had Prior Crash in 2016
Red State ^ | 27 March 2024 | Jennifer Van Laar

Posted on 03/27/2024 3:34:12 AM PDT by Sam77

According to USA Today the crew on the MV Dali lost control of the vessel and reported that to Maryland Department of Transportation officials just before it collided with the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore.

“The vessel notified MD Department of Transportation (MDOT) that they had lost control of the vessel” and a collision with the bridge “was possible,” according to an unclassified Department of Homeland Security report. “The vessel struck the bridge causing a complete collapse.”

We're also learning more about what happened in the lead-up to the collision and collapse.

Clay Diamond, executive director of the American Pilots Association, told the New York Times that one harbor pilot and one apprentice were aboard the Dali as it left the Port of Baltimore. Diamond also said that he was told by the Maryland pilots' group that the ship had a "complete blackout" and never regained propulsion power before the crash.

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2024 3:34:12 AM PDT by Sam77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sam77

Looked like that ship was in boogie mode.


2 posted on 03/27/2024 3:35:41 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (In a world of parrots and lemmings, be a watchdog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

Somebody who claims to know diesel engines says that they give off smoke when you rev them, so he thinks the pilot revved the boat before shutting it down.


3 posted on 03/27/2024 3:36:36 AM PDT by Jonty30 (Do you know why I'm always right? It's because I know everything. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Read a report yesterday that the pilot tried to reverse engines. Ship travelling at 9 miles per hour at time of collision. Even at that low speed not enough time to stop.

The Queen Mary cut her engines 30 miles from destination port.

4 posted on 03/27/2024 3:45:13 AM PDT by Churchillspirit (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

On another thread, someone posted a screen shot of (I think) a tweet saying that McConnell’s dead SIL was CEO of the company that owns that ship/barge.


5 posted on 03/27/2024 3:45:17 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Fraud vitiates everything." - SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Someone suggested the soot was due to trying to restart the the engine.


6 posted on 03/27/2024 3:45:42 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

Don’t they have tug boats at the ready ,in case this situation arises? It seems to me that the harbor “master” was lackadaisical when it comes to the safety of the bridge and harbor. WTF were they doing?


7 posted on 03/27/2024 3:46:45 AM PDT by spincaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Why wasn’t it being towed out?


8 posted on 03/27/2024 3:48:41 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spincaster

Why were they so close to the bridge pylon? They had half the river till the next one.


9 posted on 03/27/2024 3:49:24 AM PDT by spincaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

Did the ship have tug escorts, and if not, why not?


10 posted on 03/27/2024 3:50:26 AM PDT by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

“All astern,”ping!


11 posted on 03/27/2024 3:53:29 AM PDT by Candor7 (Ask not for whom Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!),<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rumplemeyer

Good question. Plus the bridge looked like it wasn’t either a good design or built cheesely or both. At least upgraded for bigger ships of the day.


12 posted on 03/27/2024 3:54:45 AM PDT by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

The whole thing makes no sense. I wonder if they are trying to distract us from something bigger


13 posted on 03/27/2024 3:56:49 AM PDT by Sam77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

Nothing would surprise me.


14 posted on 03/27/2024 3:57:47 AM PDT by Jonty30 (Do you know why I'm always right? It's because I know everything. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

Baltimore is pro-diversity, so I wonder who the apprentice pilot was. Doesn’t matter, because this looks like a purely mechanical issue, there could have been some seamanship decisions, but an out-of-control ship there’s not a lot you can do, although sone of the decisions they made could have caused it to turn at the end.


15 posted on 03/27/2024 3:59:41 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spincaster

Haven’t heard anything about the harbor “master”, the ship’s captain, or crew.


16 posted on 03/27/2024 4:02:37 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

It is obvious from one of the videos that the ship was steered hard to the right into the bridge pier.
If not for that steerage it would appear to have passed under the bridge.
I explain, the viewers perspective of the side of the ship shortens rapidly as it approaches ie: comes towards the bridge pier which indicates alignment with not divergence from.


17 posted on 03/27/2024 4:06:25 AM PDT by Recompennation (Don’t blame me my vote didn’t count)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

What about dropping the anchor?


18 posted on 03/27/2024 4:07:25 AM PDT by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

It was suggested that they should build a tunnel, for safety reasons. They built a bridge because it was cheaper. Bridge detractors speculated as to the date the structure would come crashing down, thanks to this type of incident. At just under 50 years, it’s had a good run.


19 posted on 03/27/2024 4:08:30 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

in the 70’s the largest ships were about 1/3 the size of todays largest ships

After the 1980 bridge collapse near Tampa, bridge supports everywhere should have had islands and other obstacles built around them to protect them from these events


20 posted on 03/27/2024 4:12:04 AM PDT by ChronicMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson