Posted on 09/11/2023 6:52:15 AM PDT by libstripper
A somewhat unexpected twist has emerged in the JFK assassination saga, which blows a hole in a critical government narrative surrounding his death.
On Saturday, 88-year-old Paul Landis gave an exclusive interview with The New York Times where he shared he shared his revelations regarding what happened November 22, 1963, in Dallas — the day JFK was allegedly assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald. Landis that year was a Secret Service agent assigned to First Lady Jackie Kennedy’s protective detail, as the Daily Mail notes.
Landis’s revelations regarding what happened 60 years ago lay waste to one critical claim by the Warren Commission and raises questions regarding whether there was a second shooter besides Oswald.
The narrative advanced by the Warren Commission is that one of the bullets fired at the president’s limousine struck not only Kennedy in the back but also Texas Governor John B. Connally Jr. in the back, chest, wrist, and thigh. Connally was riding next to Kennedy at the time.
This has been called the “magic bullet” theory to millions of skeptics because it seemingly defies the law of common sense and physics.
Landis told the Times that after Kennedy was shot, he was the one who retrieved the so-called “magic bullet” and explained the chaotic scene that gave him the opportunity.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
That’s what every American saw and were told they didn’t see it.
Our government has been against us for a very long time.
They’ve used our morality against us. Our faith against us. Our loyalty against us. Our patriotism against us. Our wealth against us.
I don’t know exactly who ‘THEY’ are anymore, but THEY need to be brought to justice.
No he wasn't, Jackie was.
Connally was in the front...............
Sure looks like it blew the back of his head off.
60 years. That’s like the 40 ‘witnesses’ at Benghazi. Didn’t happen.
I was eight years old at the time.
Even I didn’t believe “ the single-bullet theory”. It just didn’t make any sense at all. .................
The magic bullet theory, courtesy of the original RINO, Arlen Specter.
‘They’ go by several different names, but ‘they’ are all the same folks..................
I’ve never shot another human being in the head with a rifle, but I have shot quite a few animals with rifles equal to or more powerful than what Oswald supposedly used, they don’t fall toward the shot, either they drop straight down or fall back away from the shot.
To me, the Zapruder Film clearly shows JFK’s head snapping back and to the left, indicating the shot came from the front and from the right and the Grassy Knoll area.
Yet for the last sixty years he viewed Oswald as the lone gunman. What changed that made him start to doubt that? The article doesn't say anything in that regard. Perhaps he was just trying to get his name in the paper? I'm not saying Oswald was necessarily the lone gunman, but a sudden change of mind by an 88 year-old guy sixty years later based on no new evidence doesn't seem particularly newsworthy to me.
>> That’s what every American saw and were told they didn’t see it. <<
What? They saw the bullet lying next to Connelly? The “cover-up” was to hide the fact that the Soviet Union’s agent killed Kennedy. The Zapruder film order was shuffled to make it seem like “the magic bullet” had an impossible flight pattern and that three shots with three echoes looked like six shots, including an impossibly fast shot pattern.
The Leftists knew that if America realized that the communists within America killed Kennedy and installed their own socialist klansmen to forever keep Black people as a revolutionary force of government dependents, there would be a backlash, so they created all this second-shooter nonsense.
Nobody saw a second shooter.
Nobody heard anything other than EXACTLY the echoes you would expect to hear.
The magic bullet seems farfetched when the presumed initial angles are deliberately presented wrongly, and one presumes that the killer’s intent is to strike Connelly in a bunch of random, useless places. When Connelly is treated as just simply what was behind Kennedy, nothing seems odd.
His entire body falls backward and to the left.
Even in 1963, as a junior in high school, I never believed the government’s story about the JFK murder.
In fact, nobody I knew believed it, either.
Based upon your analysis, I’d say “they” are so well hidden/massively protected, there’s no chance they’ll ever be brought to justice ... in this lifetime.
As one article cited the “Case Closed” author as pointing out, NEVER trust someone’s memory when it’s clearer years after the incident than just after the incident first happened.
Here’s a link to the best Zapruder film clip showing the head shot scene I describe in my post:
Anyone who has visited Oswald’s position on the 6th floor of the Texas Book Depository, and has hunted, can see it clearly.
Oswald had a perfect shot as JFK’s motorcade came directly towards his position down Houston Street. JFK was moving very slowly and the motorcade was trapped by other cars, and crowds lining the street. Oswald had a full body shot.
Yet oddly, Oswald waited to fire until JFK’s car turned and sped-up, was moving away from him and only a head-shot was available. Why would he do that?
The most obvious conclusion is that Oswald waited because there was a planned crossfire/kill-zone from other shooters.
The time is right to disclose government lies and cover-ups. Thirty years ago no one would have believed him and Turd Kennedy would have had him silenced or worse.
While the Leftists distract us away from their murder of JFK and the cover-up of the Soviet agent known to have killed him, let’s not miss the relevant conspiracy unfolding:L
It’s the anniversary of September 11, and our president is headed to Alaska to make us dependent on Saudi oil.
Maybe he wants the truth before he meets his maker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.