Skip to comments.
Does anyone recall the income tax rate in the 50s, 60s, or 70s? (Vanity)
15 Dec 2022
| Me
Posted on 12/15/2022 1:00:32 PM PST by amorphous
Below is an income tax table I found online. It's kind of shocking. I'm starting to distrust online sources - wondering if anyone on Free Republic would be able to verify its accuracy:
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: goodolddays; irs; tax; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: nickcarraway
JFK at the time was a Moderate or Moderate Liberal. Today, he would be Conservative.
41
posted on
12/15/2022 2:53:38 PM PST
by
cowboyusa
(America Cowboy up! )
To: amorphous
Wow, that’s crazy! Trying to put it into perspective...
The average family income in 1951: $3,700/year
Average cost to buy a house: $9,000
$200,000 in 1951 was equivalent to about $2 million today.
Still, the income tax rates were insanely high back then.
To: EEGator
The year the Titanic sank.....
43
posted on
12/15/2022 3:17:23 PM PST
by
gundog
( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
To: BBB333
The brackets for Virginia income tax have not been adjusted since the 1970s.
The top bracket starts at something like $18K.
To: Tired of Taxes
They were high, 90% was the highest rate, but there were lots and lots of write-offs for people, so no one paid that rate or anywhere near it.
To: natalie227
The top rate was not 90% when Reagan got in office, and don’t forget while Reagan may have lowered tax rates he still raised taxes about 36 times in office.
To: amorphous
I don’t think the tax was levied against wages until the 50’s. Just income. “Glenshaw glass” scotus ruling changed the direct tax to include wages. Changed the tax to be om appurtenance to wealth plus income income. no source or derivation required..
To: MIchaelTArchangel
Pope also had personal service contracts and their own corporations where the tax rates were lower. All sorts of way to avoid that rate.
To: amorphous
strange those years are looked upon as "the good old days."- Individualism was still respected. Now it's 'think like us or you'll be outcast'.
- Public Servants were more convincingly so. Now they're usually Huckstering Serpents.
- The "town square" involved real conversations with your neighbors, and most could account for themselves at any time. Now in the digital age there are fake personas in every direction. They're ounting coup and intent on manipulating others' choices.
- One working person could fund a family. If there were difficulties extended family would graciously help (usually). This tied people together and encouraged responsibility. Now it's expected that the rules and regulations of "government" will supply the "charity", and irresponsibility is pandemic.
- Upper federal income tax rates may have been scary, but in reality almost everyone was in the same base tax bracket. Now, the situation is not that much different, but the time spent conforming to tax laws is counterproductive to say the least.
- Sales taxes and state income taxes were low, and government workers served the community. For lower than average pay they had a secure job. Now government workers serve themselves for the most part, are paid better than the private sector, and are pretty much immune from removal.
49
posted on
12/15/2022 3:44:15 PM PST
by
Tellurian
(Your phone is your cattle tag.)
To: amorphous
Historical tax rates are not particularly useful without factoring in the effect of typical deductions available. This would give the typical marginal tax rate paid at each bracket. I can assure you, someone in the 70% bracket and counting their dividend checks was not paying anywhere near 70% taxes on a marginal basis.
What this example tax bracket detail shows is the Democrat obsession with taxing the rich for the rhetoric while protecting their buddies in real life.
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
No we were paying for Viet Nam
51
posted on
12/15/2022 4:28:02 PM PST
by
Nifster
(OI see puppy dogs in the clouds )
To: amorphous
No, but I know that the rate was 75% coming out of WW I thanks to Woody Wilson, and I think 25% on the lowest bracket.
Before the war it was 6% and 1%.
Under Harding/Coolidge it was cut to 25% and 5%.
The point is, even after the “huge” Harding/Coolidge tax cuts, taxpayers were paying about 4-5x more than before the war.
52
posted on
12/15/2022 4:35:37 PM PST
by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
To: amorphous
That was back when you could write off everything. Today, you have to be bankrupted by medical costs before you can write off a penny. Cars, no longer a write-off.
I call it a push. We had high tax rates but prolific write offs knocked taxes down substantially. People frankly had more buying power back then, when marginal rates were high but you could write everything off.
53
posted on
12/15/2022 5:02:03 PM PST
by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
To: Gunslingr3
Thanks. Taxes were not applied to total income, as you stated. No one would work by those measures.
54
posted on
12/15/2022 6:29:53 PM PST
by
griswold3
(Truth, Beauty and Goodness )
To: amorphous
In Nero Wolfe stories of that era, Wolfe would slack off at the end of a productive year because the taxes were so high. Of course, some murder would happen that would force him to get involved whether he felt like it or not.
55
posted on
12/16/2022 6:28:17 AM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth? (Luke 18:8))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson