Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Gun Maverick, My .02 cents worth.
28 May 22 | Fightin Kentuckian

Posted on 05/28/2022 9:09:54 AM PDT by fightin kentuckian

Went to see the new Top Gun last night with my hot girlfriend. The first time I saw the original I was in Air Force Tech School and went to see it with my wing man at the mall in Henderson KY. This was of course, smack dab in the middle of the 80s when the movie really meant something. I had expected this to flop like the remake of Red Dawn because in large part due to the context of the time, then and now. But I was disproved, thank goodness, read on.

I wanted to like this movie a whole lot because of my history with it and I'll try not to give too much away. I'll cut to the chase, overall the movie was fantastic. It was nail biter. It was not as sophisticated as the plot in the first movie but not bad. I would have executed it differently with my 30+ year military background to make it a little more believable but that's me.

There was NO overt political language and that was very nice given todays movies. However there small political realities of the woke era that you'll notice. For example they never used the term "cockpit". Instead they used a term, "pilot in the box". Oh well. And the pilots assembled for the dangerous mission were the utmost in diversity, with a tough talking hispanic female, a dorky white guy named Bob, and the rest black and hispanic millennials acting like the had watched the first Top Gun several times in order to learn how to act like an Alpha Male. They did an OK job.

They tried to mimic the testerone filled VollyBall scene with a very watered down beach football scene. There were a few shirtless beefcake shots but nothing close to the original. After all we couldn't overshadow the strong hispanic female pilot or offend any beta cucks in the audience. But one thing I did notice that was a pleasant surprise, there wasn't one tattoo or piercing shown in that scene.

The dogfighting scenes were a different story and the pilots behavior was very, very millennial. In the first movie all the pilots were angry with themselves for not being good enough to best their instructors. In this movie the pilots sound just like the whiny millennials that they are. I heard a lot of, "we can't keep up with him" and "we don't do it that way, he's an old guy". Very different mentalities from 37 years ago.

One odd thing, when the movie starts out Mav is living in a hanger at an old navy airfield working on his P-51 Mustang (Yep, Wow!) and in the background of the hanger you see vintage motorcycles and cars and Mav's living quarters. This was out of character for Mav but it seems to me the producers borrowed heavily from Clive Cussler's, Dirk Pit character for this aspect of Mav's life.

That's about it. Overall I really liked and enjoyed the movie Oh and btw, Jennifer Connoley is my new crush. She'll be yours too.

Have a great and safe Memorial Day Weekend Freepers.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: butterface; hollywood; imaginaryhotgirl; mav; movie; movies; tom; topgun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Macho MAGA Man

Yes, the “predictable minority superiority over the whites” IS racist. Extremely so.


21 posted on 05/28/2022 9:30:13 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ytrebil

That was not a description of my girlfriend, that was a fact. lol. 5’7”, 130, blonde, blue, thin build, huge EE rack. ;). True.


22 posted on 05/28/2022 9:30:30 AM PDT by fightin kentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N; fightin kentuckian
The tough-girl thing really turns me off. Secondarily, the predictable minority superiority over the whites also turns me off.

After reading the intro I thought I might like to go see it. I even looked to see where it is playing locally. But after reading the rest of the review, and being turned off by the things quoted above, I think I'll pass.

23 posted on 05/28/2022 9:30:51 AM PDT by libertylover (Our BIGGEST problem, by far, is that most of the media is hate & agenda driven, not truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian; ytrebil

We’re all obviously more interested in your “hot” girlfriend that the stupid movie because truly “hot” girls - I mean the REAL deal, not phony hot - are so freaking hard to find these days.

We want to know more about what makes your girl “hot” and maybe where she might be located on the “Crazy/Hot Matrix”.


24 posted on 05/28/2022 9:32:59 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Farmerbob

Tons, they referred back to the original quite a bit.


25 posted on 05/28/2022 9:33:01 AM PDT by fightin kentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian
Oh and btw, Jennifer Connoley is my new crush. She'll be yours too.

I saw a few Tweets over the past few days claiming that Maverick was about an old guy getting the young girl and asking why Kelly McGillis was replaced by Jennifer Connelly.

The thing is, Connelly is 51 and Cruise is 59. That's certainly an appropriate age set.

McGillis, OTOH, is a 64-year-old, out-of-shape lesbian.

26 posted on 05/28/2022 9:34:20 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (My boss wants me to sign up for a 401K. No way I'm running that far! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules
Sounds like a woke movie to me.

...and a reflection of today's military.

27 posted on 05/28/2022 9:35:19 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (My boss wants me to sign up for a 401K. No way I'm running that far! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian

Jennifer Connoly has been my crush since 1984.


28 posted on 05/28/2022 9:35:47 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

“That’s a tranny!!”


29 posted on 05/28/2022 9:37:27 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Unique

Kelly McGillis never did it for me in the first one. At first glance she looked OK in 86 but she wasn’t right for the part. The should have cast a hotter, better known, sexy woman the first time around.


30 posted on 05/28/2022 9:38:41 AM PDT by fightin kentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian

Saw the movie with my wife yesterday...great “summer” movie with just enough (not too much) appropriate flashbacks.

I would call this a very good sequel...not too many of those around.


31 posted on 05/28/2022 9:40:13 AM PDT by Herodes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian
It was not as sophisticated as the plot in the first movie

Star overcomes fears from a flying accident to become a hero and wins beautiful girl - less sophisticated than that? LOL!

Thanks for the review.

32 posted on 05/28/2022 9:41:41 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

I guess you will never find out whether the “maverick” is a tranny. And I’m not telling!


33 posted on 05/28/2022 9:42:18 AM PDT by alstewartfan ("She looks like she's 19 years old, sitting there like a lady with her legs crossed." Creepy Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian

“And the pilots assembled for the dangerous mission were the utmost in diversity, with a tough talking hispanic female, a dorky white guy named Bob, and the rest black and hispanic millennials acting like the had watched the first Top Gun several times in order to learn how to act like an Alpha Male”.

SOS! I’ll save my $.


34 posted on 05/28/2022 9:42:51 AM PDT by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian

I am just here for the pic of the hot girlfriend


35 posted on 05/28/2022 9:45:46 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

I know a girl can be truly a hot item - the real ones don’t show it off. Another REAL issue is do they mind being (”WANT” to be) placed under you as their head if you get married. That and their faith is what makes for a long-term heaven or hell.


36 posted on 05/28/2022 9:53:36 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

She’s a tough guy.

Fugeddabouddit.


37 posted on 05/28/2022 9:54:17 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian
That was not a description of my girlfriend, that was a fact. lol. 5’7”, 130, blonde, blue, thin build, huge EE rack. ;). True.

An electrical engineer AND blue. A smart Smurf.
38 posted on 05/28/2022 9:54:44 AM PDT by Old Yeller (A nation of sheep, produces a government of wolves.l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian
Kelly McGillis never did it for me in the first one. At first glance, she looked OK in 86 but she wasn’t right for the part. They should have cast a hotter, better known, sexy woman the first time around.

She was fine AF to me back in the day. :0)

39 posted on 05/28/2022 9:54:56 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (My boss wants me to sign up for a 401K. No way I'm running that far! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: fightin kentuckian

We saw it yesterday. Your review is almost exactly mine.

“...overall the movie was fantastic. It was nail biter.”

A guy movie, but we chicks were on the edges of our seats, too.

“There was NO overt political language and that was very nice given todays movies.”

That stood out to us, too. DH thinks it’s because Cruise is a good businessman and would rather not alienate half of his audience. (If any wokeness like rainbow flags, homo couples, etc., had appeared, we’d have left.) Of course, there was the obligatory diversity but that’s everywhere.

“There were a few shirtless beefcake shots “

Oh, yes. :)

Also interesting was how they worked Iceman (Kilmer) into the plot.

The girl lead Connelly — I’d never heard of her before although my husband had. I didn’t think she was anything special. Even though Kelly McGillis is a lesbian I think she was a stronger counterpart to Cruise — better chemistry.

We’re glad we went; it was very entertaining even though quite fantastical.


40 posted on 05/28/2022 9:56:13 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Jesus took my burden and left me with a song.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson