Middle East: Hatred before "grievances"

DP ^ | May 23, 2021

[Conservat1]

No. It's not a case of 'which came first, the chicken or the egg'.

Seeing the horrific Arab Muslim attacking Jews, even in the US, at times with 'allahu akbar,' under banner of do called "free palestine," reminds us to refresh our memory. Hatred came before grievances...

Here are highlights of Arab attacks on Jews before 1948.

• * Arab attack on Jews 1886 Petach Tikwa.
• * In 1914 'Filastin' was banned by the Turks for inciting racial hatred.
• * 1920, al-Husseini instigated killing Jews. Firing up with jihadi calls to kill.
• > * In 1929, Mufti al-Husseini instigated an all out massacre. Targeted victims were non -zionist pious Jews.
• * In the 1930s, the mufti and his allies massacred and or intimidated moderate Arabs.
  ['Jews Urge Arabs To Shun Bigotry... Grand Mufti Adamant.' The New York Times, July 18, 1930].

• * In 1935-6, he and Jamal al-Husseini founded fascist, Hitler-youth type movement.

• * In 1941, the Mufti pushed for the Arab-Nazi Farhud pogrom in Iraq. A key event in the explusion of Jews from Arab countries 1940s-1950s.

• * In the same year, the Mufti met with Hitler and agreed on corporation. His henchman, Ahmed Shukeiri helped the Nazis too.
• * In 1946 Shukeiri justified the Holocaust and in 1947 he promised, every word of UN resolution will be erases by the blood of the Jews and next day, after the Partition Plan was accepted by the Zionists and rejected by the Arabs, attacks on Jews stepped up.
  ___
  
  Point is, as long as incitement goes on, in schools, in mosques, by their leadership [www.palwatch.org, www.memri.org]. (Core is twin bigotry: Ethnic Arab racism and religious Islamic intolerance), and some helping them out in the West, no "solution" is ever even a possibility.

[Red Badger]

They need Festivus.......................

[Jim Noble]

Yes, we get it.

The Arabs don’t want the Jews there, and the Jews want the land.

They will fight until one side wins and the other side loses.

[Conservat1]

One side seeks genocide, the other seeks survival.

[Jim Noble]

“ One side seeks genocide, the other seeks survival”

That’s a bit dramatic, but OK. That’s just another way of saying these two sides are having a war.

Wars end when one side wins. All this nonsense about the “international community” and “UN resolutions” and a phony “peace process” is just bilge water.

The Arabs are undefeated. What the price of defeating them is, is unknown, but it could very well be genocide. You are correct that if the Jews lose most of them will die, so it’s rational for them to keep fighting or move to Florida.

What’s NOT rational is to expect an undefeated enemy to surrender just to be good guys. The Arabs are not good guys, they are not going to surrender (sign a peace treaty) until they are defeated, and Israel is either unable or unwilling to defeat them, which makes the whole thing very curious.

[Olog-hai]

To make it plainer: The “Palestinians” seek genocide while Israel seeks survival. And no, that’s not overly dramatic, given what the “Palestinian” leaders have said over and over.