Skip to comments.
In Their Rush to Impeachment, Pelosi and Schiff Overlooked One Little Thing, McCarthy Found It
Red State ^
| 8:18 am on November 22, 2019
| by Elizabeth Vaughn
Posted on 11/22/2019 9:10:32 AM PST by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: Red Badger
If this “rebuttal” day is allowed, I expect something “more newsworthy” to occur that day.
2
posted on
11/22/2019 9:14:23 AM PST
by
CatOwner
To: Red Badger
If schitt says no, can the Rs rush this through the courts?
Is it something that courts would address?
3
posted on
11/22/2019 9:14:31 AM PST
by
dp0622
(Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to make ends meet)
To: dp0622
If schitt says no, can the Rs rush this through the courts?
The courts have no standing.
No court will get involved on an internal House matter.
4
posted on
11/22/2019 9:16:48 AM PST
by
CIB-173RDABN
(I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
To: Red Badger
Schiff will limit the Republican space to a broom closet and the media won’t show up. So there’s that.
To: CIB-173RDABN
6
posted on
11/22/2019 9:17:28 AM PST
by
dp0622
(Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to make ends meet)
To: Red Badger
Even if Schiff allowed this, which he won’t, he will not allow the 2 witnesses republicans want and will not issue subpoenas. Hunter Biden and the double secret not allowed to be mentioned whistleblower. Nice try but no “cigar”.
7
posted on
11/22/2019 9:17:29 AM PST
by
pnut22
To: Red Badger
If Hillary can expose classified information, why should Pencilneck be troubled by a little House Rule?
ML/NJ
8
posted on
11/22/2019 9:19:31 AM PST
by
ml/nj
To: Red Badger
This is nonsense.
The House passed a specific set of rules for the “investigation” that supersede existing House rules.
McCarthy is just posturing. He knows his “request” will not be honored.
9
posted on
11/22/2019 9:20:09 AM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: dp0622
If schitt says no, can the Rs rush this through the courts?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep.
10
posted on
11/22/2019 9:21:01 AM PST
by
Candor7
((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obam_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: Red Badger
THE SCHIFF HOUSE DUMPSTER FIRE IN 2 MINUTES!
Phony claims of collusion, phone calls, Quid pro quo &, finally, bribery are all Democrat excuses to piss away millions of our dough and waste years they could use to solve REAL problems here! Did I mention that they were also trying to save their worthless asses?
https://www.brighteon.com/071a991d-1127-4564-a44a-0b4e44e785f1
To: Red Badger
12
posted on
11/22/2019 9:22:40 AM PST
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: Red Badger
“Democracy” means the Democrat Party wins.
13
posted on
11/22/2019 9:23:26 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: Red Badger
Demoncrats play hardball. Republicans play by “Roberts Rules of Order”. Until we take the gloves off, we will always lose
14
posted on
11/22/2019 9:23:33 AM PST
by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: Red Badger
The author makes the mistake of assuming that the Democrats will be constrained by anything. Any Republican move to call their own witnesses will be gaveled down and any objection will be ruled out of order and the Resist Democrats will simply shutdown the Republicans no matter what and the complicit media will cover it all up or actually demonize the Republicans for trying to disrupt justice.
15
posted on
11/22/2019 9:23:45 AM PST
by
Truth29
To: Candor7; CIB-173RDABN
One of you is right. One of you is wrong.
Wish I knew which :)
16
posted on
11/22/2019 9:24:23 AM PST
by
dp0622
(Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to make ends meet)
To: Red Badger
Yeah, but, I’m not so sure these R’s won’t swing and miss.
Never know.
17
posted on
11/22/2019 9:25:52 AM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: dp0622
No, House Rules are no business of the courts. Both Houses set their own rules by the Constitution. Separation of powers............
18
posted on
11/22/2019 9:26:57 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain...................)
To: pnut22
I smell Citronella in the air.
19
posted on
11/22/2019 9:28:50 AM PST
by
ptsal
To: dp0622
The Supreme Court would not touch this if they tried to get in there, they are not a trial court. However a lower federal court could have trial jurisdiction because of the obvious civil rights violations against president Trump committed by Adam Schiff, as a matter of a quasi judicial hearing involving the personal jeopardy of the present. This would be an administrative law case based on Civil Rights violations.
Yep, they would be able to get into court on the regulation.
20
posted on
11/22/2019 9:30:18 AM PST
by
Candor7
((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obam_the_quintessentia_1.html)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson