Posted on 07/13/2019 9:28:46 AM PDT by Sheapdog
Texas father has been legally prohibited from raising his son as a boy because his ex-wife allegedly decided their son is a transgender girl and is preparing him for chemical castration at age 8 and a future sex change surgery, which the father may be forced to help pay for.
Jeff Younger, who is locked in a court battle with his ex-wife over whether their son should undergo transition to a girl, says a court order bans him from discussing things like religion or the need to be respectful to girls.
Jeff and his former spouse Anne Georgulas are trying to resolve a parental dispute over their son, James. Anne insists that James identifies as a girl, calls him Luna, and envisions hormone therapy and eventually sex-change surgery in the future. Jeff rejects the idea and says his son is perfectly comfortable being a boy in his presence. The pair are fighting a legal battle, with a court temporarily ordering Jeff not to impose a male identity on the child.
The order forbids Jeff from calling his son James in front of anyone who knows him as a girl, and this significantly limits what they can do together, he told RTs Sophie Shevardnadze.
(Excerpt) Read more at informationliberation.com ...
The courts ruling means that Jeff, who is a religious Orthodox Christian, has to be careful when discussing his faith with his son, he said. He is also cautious about teaching James how to behave decently, so that his words cannot be interpreted as imposing a male gender identity.
Im even a little trepidatious about reading the Book of Genesis as we go through our Bible readings after Pascha, he said. So, Ive had a lot of trouble communicating with him on religious issues and on basic things that youd have to teach boys, issues around self-control: how they should deal with women, older women, being respectful to females of their peer group.
Its very difficult for me to figure out how to do this without violating that order.
Jeff said James was misdiagnosed with gender dysphoria and simply wants the approval of both his parents.
The court asked us to take them to social services and let the boys express their preferences, Jeff said. And what James said was: he wants to be a girl at his moms home and a boy at his dads home. He basically wants both his parents to love him. Jeff Younger wrote an entire book about the case which he has shared on his website SaveJames.com.
Sounds like the ex-wife is a nut case. Too bad the father chose her to bear his child.
There are some truly vindictive women out there who in divorce would blow up themselves and their children if they thought they could get back at their ex-husbands.
The judge needs to be impeached, or not re-elected.
You are not a responsible parent with visitation rights if you leave your child alone with a baby sitter, right ?
And our wonderful unbiased court system automatically sides with the mother for whatever she decides is right for the children.
“Family” courts are total jokes. Unfortunately they are very, very bad jokes.
Concerned dads get zero support. They get court orders and threats of jail instead.
In Texas?! Right out of Bible Prophecy.
In Texas?
I thought judges are sane there, but apparently not.
Poor guy, poor kid.
Bookmark under more insanities.
America’s war is HERE AT HOME.
This is sick. Pity for the boy. Can’t believe this is happening in Texas.
For a while, my youngest thought she was an avocado.
She got over it.
What freaking DOCTOR would proceed with chemical castration of an 8 year old simply because his mommy brings him in and says to do it ? That should require a court order making the idiot judge that signs the order culpable when tranny despair and regret occurs later.
judges who are not fit to judge anything or anyone.
If this is happening in Texas, then were done as a free country.
A father doe snot get his free speech to his son. This judge is way off the reservation with this ruling
Terrible.
I wouldn’t hold it against the dad if he started taking scalps
So very true. This situation at hand is beyond the pale - Mom gets to decide to mutilate and ruin the life of her child, most likely to spite the ex, and the court sees this as a 'benefit' to the son? WTF?!
This desire to be the first on your block with a PC mutilated child is way past sick and running full speed into abject evil. I can only imagine that Mom is destined for one of the worst rings of hell.
Chemical castration at age 8? He is a CHILD, and should not be allowed to make such a life-changing decision at that age, especially since a lot of research shows that sexual dysphoria is very often a transitory phenomenon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.