Posted on 09/18/2017 3:59:15 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler
POLL: Should Hillary Clinton challenge the legitimacy of the 2016 election?
Yes, the Russians stole it for President Trump
No, the "Russians stole it" narrative is a liberal lie
I'm not sure
ping
Sure, why not? There are many ways to make a fool of oneself. This will serve as well as any other.
She should have challenged the legitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama.
He is not a natural born citizen.
She’s been challenging the legitimacy of the election every time she blames someone or something else for her losing.
Memories . . .
As you watch the gif in post #3, keep your eye on her right foot. She is down before she gets off the curb.
Challenge it with who? The election was already certified by the electoral college and congress and Trump was sworn-in as the 45th president. There is no mechanism for any of this. The United Nations? Our alien overlords? Who?
Yes, she should. She should also hire Stephen Colbert to be her ambassador to the American people.
Oh, That Time When (Hillary) Clinton Said Anyone Who Doesn’t Accept The Results Of An Election Is A Threat To Democracy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3504281/posts
Townhall.com ^ | Nov 28, 2016 | Matt Vespa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBxZIuFZEmA
Clinton mocks Trump’s refusal to pledge to accept election results: ‘Some people are sore losers’
No- The Electoral College has voted & certified it’s vote.
She is no better a lawyer today than she was over 40 years ago when she was removed from the committee that was working on the impeachment of Nixon & they caught her making up ‘facts’ for the indictment.
IF she wanted to challenge a sitting President—why didn’t she challenge Obama-—because he certainly did not qualify to be a candidate.
Ha...Enjoy the fall....see you next trip.
The question is asked by the incredibly stupid “Headline of the Day” web site. Based on my observations, whoever runs it can’t be accused of having much brainpower. It’s in the same league as “...you won’t believe what happened next” sites.
Moot question.
She will relive ‘what might have been’ the rest of her days, just like Al has relived the 2000 election and Kerry has relived the 2004 election.
Sadly for ole Hillary, the ‘several states’ and the House certified the 2016 election. The Constitution has no provisions for a do-over.
True. I don’t think there is any legal way to challenge anything at this point. Electoral vote was certified by Congress, and each state prior to that time, had certified their election results and certified the slates of electors chosen to be in the Electoral College.
She’s blowing hot air.
From what I’ve seen lately they can probably find some Federal Judge with delusions of Godhood who will declare Hillary President. Not that it would stick, but the media will celebrate as though there is no higher authority.
If she did escalate her insane rantings to the level of an actual court case, discovery could be very interesting. Libs would tune in to see the show and they might learn something.
Maybe that's why they feel the need to challenge it: "Hey! We cheated to win, so we should have won!"
Good catch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.