ping
Sure, why not? There are many ways to make a fool of oneself. This will serve as well as any other.
She should have challenged the legitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama.
He is not a natural born citizen.
She’s been challenging the legitimacy of the election every time she blames someone or something else for her losing.
Challenge it with who? The election was already certified by the electoral college and congress and Trump was sworn-in as the 45th president. There is no mechanism for any of this. The United Nations? Our alien overlords? Who?
Yes, she should. She should also hire Stephen Colbert to be her ambassador to the American people.
Oh, That Time When (Hillary) Clinton Said Anyone Who Doesn’t Accept The Results Of An Election Is A Threat To Democracy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3504281/posts
Townhall.com ^ | Nov 28, 2016 | Matt Vespa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBxZIuFZEmA
Clinton mocks Trump’s refusal to pledge to accept election results: ‘Some people are sore losers’
No- The Electoral College has voted & certified it’s vote.
She is no better a lawyer today than she was over 40 years ago when she was removed from the committee that was working on the impeachment of Nixon & they caught her making up ‘facts’ for the indictment.
IF she wanted to challenge a sitting President—why didn’t she challenge Obama-—because he certainly did not qualify to be a candidate.
Moot question.
She will relive ‘what might have been’ the rest of her days, just like Al has relived the 2000 election and Kerry has relived the 2004 election.
Sadly for ole Hillary, the ‘several states’ and the House certified the 2016 election. The Constitution has no provisions for a do-over.
If she did escalate her insane rantings to the level of an actual court case, discovery could be very interesting. Libs would tune in to see the show and they might learn something.
Maybe that's why they feel the need to challenge it: "Hey! We cheated to win, so we should have won!"
Lock her up!
ABSOLUTELY!!
Yes, she SHOULD challenge it.
Then we can have a TRUE AUDIT of all those states that voted for her as well as for President Trump.
Then maybe we will be able to PROVE all the vote, registration and population discrepancies that started to appear during the Stein re-count before it was so conviently called off..
Why do people treat this woman like she is mentally well?
Who thinks up these ridiculous questions?
This poll is very unfair because my response, ‘She should take her ill-gotten millions and just go away permanently.’ was not a choice.
Drive a stake through it’s heart.
You mean more than she already has?
Should Hillary Clinton challenge the legitimacy of the 2016 election?
No, the “Russians stole it” narrative is a liberal lie (52%)
Yes, the Russians stole it for President Trump (44%)
I’m not sure (3%)