WHY Did The United States Really Topple LIBYA – Same Reason They Want To Topple ASSAD?

IWB ^ | Pamela Williams

[davikkm]

Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State under President Barack Obama, seems to have gotten away with all her crimes against the American people. Of course, it was not just the American people she betrayed There are many around the world whose suffering has been revived by Clinton. When she and Obama toppled Muammar Qaddafi in Libya, they invited in a new modern day slavery.

The ISIS invasion brought with it a revival of human trafficking, slavery, and flesh markets. I think the word “freed” was what she did for the Libyan people after brutally murdering Qaddafi. That “freedom” brought Libya into anarchy and bloodshed followed. The US inspired ISIS was more than happy to bring crucifixtion, decapitation, and sex slavery into Libya. Now, a thriving human slavery market has emerged, thanks to Clinton and Obama.

It seems globalists always use the word “free” to describe their policy of toppling another government, and opening up a void terrorists are happy to fill. Why do these elites have such a pattern of action in other Countries? What do they really want? What is really behind this policy?

[ptsal]

Is this recycled news —click bait?

Source: IWB
Author: Pamela Williams
Posted by: davikkm

<>What is the business plan?
<>How much per click?
\\\\\\\

[silverleaf]

oil
banks that finance companies who deal in oil
gold and dictators who have whole bunch of it and threaten to use it in ways the banks don’t want
arms dealing

One of the worst fates a 3rd world country faces is to be located on top of a gas or oil field or in the middle of a pipeline route needed by the above

[Slyfox]

Thanks for posting. You would think that someone surrounding Trump would do some homework.

[HarleyLady27]

If you really want to know the truth, read this article, it is long, but it puts all of this together:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/04/10/a-warning-against-the-no-fly-zone-approach-in-syria-its-bait/

[DugwayDuke]

Slyfox wrote: “You would think that someone surrounding Trump would do some homework.”

You would think that whoever wrote this drivel would have done some homework of their own. There is absolutely no parallel between Qaddafi/Libya and Assad/Syria.

[Enchante]

"Gaddafi wanted to introduce and only trade in the African gold Dinar – a move which would have thrown the world economy into chaos."

I'm no economist but this sounds like an idiotic statement. Certainly the world economy would not be affected at all by what Libya alone did with currency. Does the writer mean chaos if all of the African nations somehow adopted the "African gold Dinar"???? Don't think it will happen, but that too would have little to no effect on the world economy. Anyway, it wasn't going to happen just because Gadaffi wanted it. Maybe the writer means to suggest that the "African gold Dinar" would be adopted by OPEC.... that is also extremely unlikely, and still would not throw the world economy into "chaos"....

No, this sounds like careless journalistic b.s. hype.

[pierrem15]

Trump doesn't want the Syrian government destroyed, merely Assad replaced. The Russians are free to pick the next dictator, as long as the Iranians and Hezbollah are booted out.

Syria is going to be partitioned.

[BeadCounter]

Both of these cases have to do with regime change. I’ve always wondered about the Libyan invasion and there isn’t that much on it. He certainly should not have been killed before receiving a trial so we could find out anything.

[Ohioan]

You are correct. Money, whether dollars, pounds, euros or gold coins functions as a Medium of Exchange, which will constantly fluctuate in relation to the fluctuations of those things--goods, services, other currencies time, etc..--for which it is exchanged. The benefit of gold, as such, is that it is not so easy for politicians to control that fluctuation for ulterior purposes.

[grania]

You would think someone around Trump would do some homework

I'm surprised Trump doesn't know the situation. Apache Oil has leases in Egypt. The nearest port for the oil they drill is Benghazi. Neither Egypt nor Libya were going to go along with the oil company usurping all profits from both. Soon after the discovery, "local protests for regime change" in Libya and Egypt were used to clear the way. It didn't work. Sisi overthrew Obama's gov in Egypt, and Libya descended into chaos without Khadafi.

Assad, the other intended victim, stood in the way of oil company profits for the globalist puppetmasters. Assad is the defender of Christians and other minorities and wants Syria to control its own resources and wealth. I'm seriously disappointed that Trump wasn't more skeptical of how the chemical weapons got used. He's listening to the wrong people (including relatives apparently) and not getting the full unbiased facts.

There are enough bad actors in the Trump administration that he's being sucked into the globalist scheming. I'm not confident that he's going to get rid of the swamp creatures in his administration, and surround himself with people loyal to him and his "USA First" and distaste for war-mongering.

I'm surprised that Predisent Trump wasn't more skeptical about the use of chemical weapons in Syria. This is because President Trump seems to know what's being said on FR, judging by so many of his comments since he started his campaign.

[okie 54]

So 0bama could install his Muslim Brotherhood pals

[BeadCounter]

Assad’s Syria has invaded a largely Christian country in Lebanon and Father Assad had Christian leaders in Lebanon assassinated.

[blueunicorn6]

Soros was behind the destruction of Libya and the murder of Qadaffi.

If Trump can be tied to Soros, then yes, I would worry.

[blueunicorn6]

Soros wanted Qadaffi and Libya’s wealth.

Europe wants Assad to fall in Syria so that they have another supply of natural gas so they can drive down the price of natural gas that Russia is charging them. Russia has supported Syria for decades. Russia, through Assad, was not allowing a natural gas pipeline to be built through Syria.

“Money makes the world go round, the world go round, the world go round!”

[ez]

Globalists are against nationalism and therefore against strong nationalist leaders. They would like to remove these leaders and make it more likely these almost Muslim countries will go with the flow of international interests. See (establishing the caliphate )

[SaraJohnson]

What president would want camel jockies wrecking the US dollar? War is for a reason that is rarely apparent to the public. Except Freepers. Smart people, Freepers.