Thanks for posting. You would think that someone surrounding Trump would do some homework.
Slyfox wrote: “You would think that someone surrounding Trump would do some homework.”
You would think that whoever wrote this drivel would have done some homework of their own. There is absolutely no parallel between Qaddafi/Libya and Assad/Syria.
I'm surprised Trump doesn't know the situation. Apache Oil has leases in Egypt. The nearest port for the oil they drill is Benghazi. Neither Egypt nor Libya were going to go along with the oil company usurping all profits from both. Soon after the discovery, "local protests for regime change" in Libya and Egypt were used to clear the way. It didn't work. Sisi overthrew Obama's gov in Egypt, and Libya descended into chaos without Khadafi.
Assad, the other intended victim, stood in the way of oil company profits for the globalist puppetmasters. Assad is the defender of Christians and other minorities and wants Syria to control its own resources and wealth. I'm seriously disappointed that Trump wasn't more skeptical of how the chemical weapons got used. He's listening to the wrong people (including relatives apparently) and not getting the full unbiased facts.
There are enough bad actors in the Trump administration that he's being sucked into the globalist scheming. I'm not confident that he's going to get rid of the swamp creatures in his administration, and surround himself with people loyal to him and his "USA First" and distaste for war-mongering.
I'm surprised that Predisent Trump wasn't more skeptical about the use of chemical weapons in Syria. This is because President Trump seems to know what's being said on FR, judging by so many of his comments since he started his campaign.
What president would want camel jockies wrecking the US dollar? War is for a reason that is rarely apparent to the public. Except Freepers. Smart people, Freepers.