Posted on 02/09/2014 9:26:46 AM PST by Errant
Parenthetical clauses are used throughout scripture to explain how, why, when and where in close proximity to the main subject and verb.
Parentheses in the book of The Revelation explain cause and effect. They tie together the events that happen previously, to the events that transpire subsequently on the prophetic timeline. Unfortunately, parentheses, as a literary devise, come centuries after the actual parenthetical clauses so prevalent in both Hebrew and Greek linguistic constructions. Because of their late arrival into the English language, the parentheticals in the book of The Revelation have never been either deservedly researched or accurately articulated. Now, after more than 40 years in the making, The Chronological Gospels is complete with all of the extensive parenthetical clauses accurately assigned throughout the book of The Revelation.
Now, with its impending fulfillment looming large on the horizon, The Revelation can finally be understood with clarity and lived with integrity. This one feature (the parenthetical clauses in The Revelation) in The Chronological Gospels is worth one thousand times the price of the book itself.
Join Michael Rood for the first of the last four teachings on the very last book of the Bible, “Parenthetically Speaking (Before We Are Saved From the Wrath To Come)”.
Rood preaches following the Torah laws yet while preaching that got a divorce and remarried. That along with the findings of that board he has broken nearly all of the ten commandments blatantly. He’s a fraud.
Act 10:10 And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance,
Act 10:11 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth:
Act 10:12 Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air.
Act 10:13 And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.
Act 10:14 But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.
Act 10:15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common.
This has obliterated your dietary laws...
In fact, every reference to every post (and there are few) you make justifying your position is obliterated by the scripture given from God to the church...
You don't have a leg to stand on...It is so impossible for you to refute the scripture that condemns you, you don't even bother to try...
2Co 4:1 Therefore seeing we have this ministry, as we have received mercy, we faint not;
2Co 4:2 But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God.
2Co 4:3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:
2Co 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. 2Co 4:5 For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake.
Michael Rood has neglected to point out that the resources for their calendar calculations are found in astrology, numerology and kabbalist gematria. These calculations are also found in the teachings of Oriental, Egyptian, Chinese, Hindu, Zodiac and Gaia based calendar information he and his associates source for the “Astronomically and Agriculturally corrected Biblical Hebrew Calendar.” [http://www.seekgod.ca/roodzodiac.htm]
Absolutely...
He probably has them convinced that his illegal and unethical activity is ordained by God...A Jim Jones mentality...
Please, no competent Bible scholar believes Acts 10 means anything other than what Peter said it does. “That I should call no man unclean.”
That is absolutely elementary Bible knowledge.
.
>> “Michael Rood has neglected to point out that the resources for their calendar calculations are found in astrology, numerology and kabbalist gematria” <<
That is a lie from your Father the Devil.
The calendar is solely based on it’s original description in Torah. The new moon is the only basis God’s word accepts for the beginning of any month. In fact month really means new moon.
You are naked in this deliberate deceit before all here and before Yehova.
.
What is the name of your Demon guide?
What is your Mantra?
Are you channeling now as you post?
.
And they are nasty and dirty and muddy, now that the sn ow has melted!
No; I wasn't; but how can I be SURE they were?
There you go again...
There you go again...
There you go again...
There you go again...
YEP. every_single_one. And what's more is that they all know it - it is eminently provable, and easy to dig out. It shows the insidious power of tradition, and explains why YHWH insisted so very strongly that NO ONE could change, add to, or take from, His original words. And it doesn't stop there - virtually every aspect of society is covered in the names of the Fallen - Whose names we were never to have on our lips... While the name of YHWH goes unremembered... hidden... Even in His own Word. It is OUT of the mind of the people, not to mention ever passing their lips.
Too bad folks won't pan back and take that long view, as then maybe they would see.
Thanks for the link! I look for other sources all of the time and more and more are becoming available. It's one reason why I know this new search for truth in the Bible is taking hold. I'm now seeing both pastors and priests talk about some of the misconceptions we have inherited down through the ages based on tradition and not the scriptural evidence.
Yeah, I think it is catching on - And I think that is because it is closer to the truth. The thing is, Christian Replacement Theology hid from their eyes the fact that they donned the very same mantle as brought the Jews their destruction. Because of that, they cannot see that the 'falling away' happened a very long time ago. The 'end days' are a time when men would seek desperately for the truth and not find it... and the 'end days' have been happening since the days of Paul and John (both declared it)... Already then, the mystery of iniquity was afoot. They saw it rising.
No doubt Michael Rood is a bit abrasive at times, to put it mildly. Even I cringe sometimes... lol He is a former marine and having been around a few 'jar heads' and having worked with them for a time in my life, I appreciate his open candor. I find him amusing and often laugh at some of his more inventive analogies. ;)
I have much the same view. I think I have watched most of his major presentations, but I find the SNL format to be less inviting - more entertaining perhaps, but hard to keep track of. I know he is still doing a series format through SNL, but since it is all 'SNL' it is hard to pin down a topic to watch, and even harder to go back to to find or refer. There isn't even a valid synopsis most of the time.
And reference is a mighty important thing - One of the main things I would complain about is that his material is hard to defend because of it's video format. That is why he is hard to defend, and why folks can write any ol' thing without getting called on it - I sure ain't gonna wade through all the vids and bump-start through an entire segment in order to find the quote to defend him with. All I can do, since I know his general tenor, is say that isn't what he believes and tell folks they need to watch him (which they will never do).
He knows a heck of a lot about the scriptures. More than anyone I know of. I've checked him a number of times when I felt maybe he was 'stretching' things a bit. In every case, he was right on the money.[...]
Yup. There ain't no denying it - And the perspective is the part that is interesting. Jack Van Impe as an example, seems to have memorized vast tracts of the Bible in an amazing fashion... and he is a good enough preacher, i guess, so don't get me wrong... But He cannot do with that Bible what Rood can. Not even a fourth as well, because he cannot see beyond Protestant traditions. He KNOWS the Torah and the prophets, but the understanding of it eludes him, because he doesn't get the Hebrew angle, and would totally miss the things that Rood offers in almost unbearable detail.
[...] I'm also been awed by the knowledge that both you and ES have. I'm sure you've both noticed that I'm peddling as hard as I can to stay in sight of you guys!
Aww shucks... Lil' ol' me? Thanks for the compliment (and I agree with you about ES)... I can't speak for ES, but for myself, and because of the season, I can say that I feel like I haven't even put a dent in it yet, and I have been going on twenty years after this stuff. And the time grows perilously short.
Something else that is apparent is how solid you two are in your beliefs and how shaky the other side is, as if they themselves doubt what they believe - that speaks volumes. It also speaks volumes that they see a search for the Biblical truth as some sort of a threat.
For me it is a logic stream. I am a programmer (among other things), and that discipline requires or creates the ability to see 'ideas' as objects. Programming is just a whole bunch of complicated ideas (a series of commands to perform a particular task) strung together to form a whole. How the logic flows through that script may change, depending upon what you want the application to do, or even as the script is performing in an automatic fashion (FOR, IF, WHILE, AND/OR = THEN DO), but the logic has to be there... and the scripting must be perfect, or the application breaks...
In that light, it isn't so much what the Bible says as much as what it can't say - One of the most difficult parts of programming is not in getting a program to do what you want, but rather, to anticipate and trap error - to get the program NOT to do what you don't want, and to make double-dipped SURE that some (L)User down the road can't change your implementation, or use it against standard conventions according to it's design.
That is why those who say it has changed HAVE to be wrong... Because the logic stream from the very beginning says it CAN"T change, and CAN'T be ammended. There cannot BE a Torah v.2.
That is where verse-slinging will get you - If you can't see the whole logic stream, you can make it say anything you want it to, except that it breakes the logic flow - IF x = true AND y = true, then one has to interpret for BOTH x and y to be true - You can't interpret for y at the expense of x.
See? That is how one arrives at solid doctrine... At least for me. : )
I agree with you, Yeshua is indeed our example in all things...
Exactly. Folks would do well to seek out what a disciple IS in the Hebrew context.
Problem is your so called scholars aren't too bright, or they are dishonest or they just made it up, Peter didn't say that, in isolation...Peter is talking about eating in the relevant passage(s)...
Act 10:14 But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.
Act 10:15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common.
God and Peter were discussing dietary law since Peter was speaking of EATING...But to be more specific, Peter and God were speaking of anything and everything that had been deemed as unclean in the Torah, including the company Peter keeps...
Quit being dishonest...
2Co_4:2 But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God.
God just tears your false teaching apart every time you open your mouth (keyboard)...
You wish.
People can do their own research by starting here.
Michael Rood: WAY Colleagues, Occult Calendars & False Prophecies
You do mimic your leader Rood it seems.
Various individuals relate Mr. Rood's very defensive posturing, anger and blustering and refusing to give his background information when asked. Others recount that when Michael has actually given a 'resume' to pastors, and particularly one church board, they found all his references were bogus and noticed that his listed 'college' was that of The Way International. 1a Hiding The Way International involvement is clearly an attempt to cover his cult background and leanings. One of the main beliefs of The Way International is the rejection of the divinity of Jesus Christ. [http://www.seekgod.ca/rood.htm]
Meant to ping you...
Human logic has no place in understanding the words of God...
And reference is a mighty important thing - One of the main things I would complain about is that his material is hard to defend because of it's video format. That is why he is hard to defend, and why folks can write any ol' thing without getting called on it - I sure ain't gonna wade through all the vids and bump-start through an entire segment in order to find the quote to defend him with. All I can do, since I know his general tenor, is say that isn't what he believes and tell folks they need to watch him (which they will never do).
This guy has has been around for a long time...Plenty of time to put his teaching into a written format that could have references and be defended if he wanted it that way...
I believe if that happened his case would soon be demolished by competant bible believers...
He could be Rood...He certainly is rude...
From what I’ve been learning it’s Rood’s way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.