Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDGE ORDERS OBAMA to APPEAR to Testify
Atlanta Admin Court ^ | 1/20/2012 | Judge Malihi

Posted on 01/20/2012 10:57:39 AM PST by GregNH

Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012; ballot; bhocorruption; bhofascism; birthcertificate; certifigate; democrats; elections; eligibility; ga; georgia; naturalborncitizen; nobama; nobama2012; obama; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 861-873 next last
To: GregNH; Sidebar Moderator

hotdamn !

If true, why isn’t this in BREAKING ??


21 posted on 01/20/2012 11:12:02 AM PST by tomkat (para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

We all must remember though, holder hasn’t had a chance to threaten uhhh I mean talk with the Judge yet. Remember Judge Carter in California that suddenly had a change of mind about discovery and judging the merits of the case.


22 posted on 01/20/2012 11:12:22 AM PST by Crazy ole coot (Mr. obama will be tried, but as a British Citizen or American Citizen? Who knows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

bwahahaha

6 days...... I’m sure it would just be a hop skip and a jump from Disney World. It shouldn’t put him out that much! lol


23 posted on 01/20/2012 11:12:58 AM PST by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
From ORYR:

"Georgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing

Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to Appear, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge - 1/20/2012

ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).

Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.

SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012."

-end snip-

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-judge-malihi-denies-obamas.html

Obama will not even prove that he was born in the US.

24 posted on 01/20/2012 11:13:05 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

Whoa. Is this really going to happen??


25 posted on 01/20/2012 11:13:49 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cinciella
So if he doesn’t show, will the judge find him in contempt?

Rules of civil procedure call for a default judgment if he doesn't appear.

A default judgment means the claims of the plaintiffs are deemed to be proven.

26 posted on 01/20/2012 11:14:58 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

You know its juicy when it takes less than six minutes for an OBOT to show up


27 posted on 01/20/2012 11:15:20 AM PST by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

“argument regarding service”...

Is this the same thing that Clinton tried? That he’s technically “active duty military” because he’s CinC?


28 posted on 01/20/2012 11:15:48 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Obama will not even prove that he was born in the US.

Let us pray /\

29 posted on 01/20/2012 11:17:01 AM PST by GregNH (I am so ready to join a brigade of pick up trucks......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)

Just conjecturing, but...

if he ignores the subpoena, and is summarily ruled against,

and still simply ignores the ruling...

then what?
Congress wouldn’t impeach, and even if they did, Reid would dismiss it out of hand.


30 posted on 01/20/2012 11:18:04 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
(...Natural born citizen ruling)

Aren't all elected to be treated the same as all citizens?....the president is no different...he is NOT above the law.

31 posted on 01/20/2012 11:18:11 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

I sent this to DRUDGE


32 posted on 01/20/2012 11:18:26 AM PST by GregNH (I am so ready to join a brigade of pick up trucks......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

Oh come on. Subpoena our communists dictator in chief. Fat chance.


33 posted on 01/20/2012 11:18:39 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)

“Rules of civil procedure call for a default judgment if he doesn’t appear.

A default judgment means the claims of the plaintiffs are deemed to be proven.”

Works for me!


34 posted on 01/20/2012 11:18:48 AM PST by cinciella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MrB

if he ignores the subpoena, and is summarily ruled against,

But, Georgia can then keep his name off the ballot because he will not prove he is eligible. One state at a time!!!


35 posted on 01/20/2012 11:20:31 AM PST by Crazy ole coot (Mr. obama will be tried, but as a British Citizen or American Citizen? Who knows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cinciella

this judge went to Boston University law School. looking for more info on the man


36 posted on 01/20/2012 11:22:10 AM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

If Obama does not show up the Georgia Judge should rule summarily against him.

No man is above the law not even the president, and this is a Georgia issue of his applicability for the position of president, and thus elegablity to be so listed on the Georgia ballot.


37 posted on 01/20/2012 11:23:09 AM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

This is great news. Does Zero have to bring Betty White’s birth certificate with him?


38 posted on 01/20/2012 11:23:23 AM PST by JoeA (JoeA / Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
If true, why isn’t this in BREAKING ??

The big eared Kenyon PUNK, won't be there. Him and Holder both consider themselves to be above the law

39 posted on 01/20/2012 11:23:49 AM PST by mongo141
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

LOL. The chances of him showing are nil but I admire this judge.


40 posted on 01/20/2012 11:24:26 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 861-873 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson