Posted on 01/20/2012 10:57:39 AM PST by GregNH
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
hotdamn !
If true, why isn’t this in BREAKING ??
We all must remember though, holder hasn’t had a chance to threaten uhhh I mean talk with the Judge yet. Remember Judge Carter in California that suddenly had a change of mind about discovery and judging the merits of the case.
bwahahaha
6 days...... I’m sure it would just be a hop skip and a jump from Disney World. It shouldn’t put him out that much! lol
"Georgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing
Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to Appear, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge - 1/20/2012
ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).
Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012."
-end snip-
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-judge-malihi-denies-obamas.html
Obama will not even prove that he was born in the US.
Whoa. Is this really going to happen??
Rules of civil procedure call for a default judgment if he doesn't appear.
A default judgment means the claims of the plaintiffs are deemed to be proven.
You know its juicy when it takes less than six minutes for an OBOT to show up
“argument regarding service”...
Is this the same thing that Clinton tried? That he’s technically “active duty military” because he’s CinC?
Let us pray /\
Just conjecturing, but...
if he ignores the subpoena, and is summarily ruled against,
and still simply ignores the ruling...
then what?
Congress wouldn’t impeach, and even if they did, Reid would dismiss it out of hand.
Aren't all elected to be treated the same as all citizens?....the president is no different...he is NOT above the law.
I sent this to DRUDGE
Oh come on. Subpoena our communists dictator in chief. Fat chance.
“Rules of civil procedure call for a default judgment if he doesn’t appear.
A default judgment means the claims of the plaintiffs are deemed to be proven.”
Works for me!
if he ignores the subpoena, and is summarily ruled against,
But, Georgia can then keep his name off the ballot because he will not prove he is eligible. One state at a time!!!
this judge went to Boston University law School. looking for more info on the man
If Obama does not show up the Georgia Judge should rule summarily against him.
No man is above the law not even the president, and this is a Georgia issue of his applicability for the position of president, and thus elegablity to be so listed on the Georgia ballot.
This is great news. Does Zero have to bring Betty White’s birth certificate with him?
The big eared Kenyon PUNK, won't be there. Him and Holder both consider themselves to be above the law
LOL. The chances of him showing are nil but I admire this judge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.