JUSTIA.COM CAUGHT RED HANDED HIDING REFERENCES TO MINOR v. HAPPERSETT IN PUBLISHED SCOTUS OPINIONS

Natural Born Citizen ^ | July 1, 2011 | Leo Donofrio

[SatinDoll]

The US Supreme Court Center at Justia.com is the leading resource on the internet which publishes United States Supreme Court decisions. They have been caught red handed in an Orwellian attempt to revise US Supreme Court cases which mention Minor v. Happersett as precedent on the issue of citizenship, as opposed to the other issue decided in Minor, voting rights.

I have documented two incredible examples where Justia.com has been caught in the act of taking a hatchet job to US Supreme Court decisions by removing, not just the case name, “Minor v. Happersett”, but whole passages related to Chief Justice Waite’s statements on the citizenship issue which were cited favorably in BOYD V. NEBRASKA EX REL. THAYER, 143 U. S. 135 (1892), and POPE V. WILLIAMS, 193 U. S. 621 (1904).

I have published my complete investigation into this fraud perpetrated by Justia.com – including snapshots and evidence collected from the Way Back Machine at the Internet Archive – in the comments section of my previous report, THE EXPRESS LANE TO NATURAL BORN CLARITY. My investigation was triggered by a reader’s comment regarding Boyd. The comment was on a separate issue. But I then noticed that the Boyd case, as currently published by Justia.com, made reference to Minor v. Happersett without properly naming the case.

***************************************************

This is beyond shocking. Somebody, back in 2008, just prior to the election, ordered these revisions and saw to their execution. This is direct tampering with United States law. And it is evidence that Minor v. Happersett was known to be a huge stumbling block to POTUS eligibility.

It confirms that Minor v. Happersett was seen as a dangerous US Supreme Court precedent which construed the natural-born citizen clause of Article 2 Section 1 to make only those persons born in the US to citizen parents (plural)… eligible to be President.

According to binding US Supreme Court precedent, Obama is not eligible to be President. And we are obviously very late coming to this legal truth. Somebody at Justia.com tried to control and alter our awareness by hiding important Supreme Court references to Minor dating back to 2008. This is smoking gun proof of tampering. Please read my full report here.

There needs to be an investigation.

[little jeremiah]

I disagree that BB is a RINO. He posts on Fogbow. He’s hardcore leftist. Troll to de max.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2712126/posts?page=47

[Las Vegas Ron]

Get him mj!

Like your new tag line, makes sense.

[mojitojoe]

Federal appeals court rejects another lawsuit challenging Obama’s citizenship
Friday, December 23, 2011 3:53:44 PM • 51 of 60
BladeBryan to liberalh8ter

Ron Paul has had nothing to do with the their nonsense. Likewise, contrary to what some 9/11 inside-jobbers pretend, Rob Paul had nothing to do with that crank nonsense either.
Both liberals and conservatives respect Dr. Paul for his principled stances, and both are frustrated by his tenacity. The man holds some unpopular positions, but that’s no excuse for falsely putting him on such utter crank nonsense.