Posted on 05/19/2011 6:28:25 PM PDT by Red Steel
Re: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
Dear Sir/Madam,
I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense. When this comes to the public’s attention, it will be the greatest scandal in the country’s history—nothing comes even close. This will surpass the all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.
My Credentials
I have a unique background for analyzing this document. I owned a typesetting company for 11 years so I know type and form design very well. I currently own Archive Index Systems since 1993, which sells all types of document scanners worldwide and also developed document imaging software (TheRepository). I know how the scanners work. I have also sold other document imaging programs, such as Laser. Fiche, Liberty and Alchemy. I have sold and installed document imaging systems in city and county governments, so I know their procedures with imaging systems and everything about the design of such programs. This will be important in understanding what has happened with Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth.
What President Obama Presented to the Public is an alleged Certificate of Live Birth.
What President Obama presented is not the hospital birth certificate. The birth certificate would have the imprint of the baby’s footprint, weight, length and other information such as the religion. The Birth Certificate would be the source of the same information that would be typed onto the Certificate of Live Birth (the Long Form). What President Obama released is supposedly the Long Form that the County gets from the hospital, which is typed on a blank form given to the hospitals by the county. That copy is then mailed to the county Board of Health and kept as a legal government document. On Obama’s form (Figure 1) the County Clerk supposedly hand stamped the form on the upper right hand corner with a bates stamp. The number is a sequential number that reflects the sequence of Certificates that come into the County Health Department. The reason I know it was stamped by hand is because the number is crooked. The County Clerk also hand stamps the date of acceptance (box 20 and box 22). Obama’s Long Form was supposedly received on August 8, 1961, four days after his birth.
Continued in SCRIBD document below...
News Release: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
Anything coming from them should be immediately suspect from the get go, especially since that Commie AberCrombie took over. They will do whatever they can to get away with it without hesitation as they are bound by no morals.
Back when I used manual typewriters, if I was going to that much trouble to get the X inside the box, I’d make sure it was as dead on as possible. Otherwise, what’s the point in wasting that time. Just type it where it lands and be done with it. Again, it’s rote. The typist would know exactly how far to adjust it.
Back when I used manual typewriters, if I was going to that much trouble to get the X inside the box, I’d make sure it was as dead on as possible. Otherwise, what’s the point in wasting that time. Just type it where it lands and be done with it. Again, it’s rote. The typist would know exactly how far to adjust it.
Interestingly, Corsi said the same thing in one of his recent interviews. He said the forged document was surreptitiously inserted into the book so that when Soetorobma's request came in, the document was scanned or photocopied from the book in the normal fashion. That eliminated the need to simulate the curvature at the left side of the certificate, thereby simplifying the entire process.
A great analysis, thorough and irrefutable. What is the distribution of the press release? Is it being sent to Attornies General in the states and other law enforcement, and / or legislatures for action?
And oh yeah, click the image in post 286 to see more proof that Obama’s COLB is a forgery.
I'm not sure what you are talking about there is more resolution in the WH image (bottom) than the AP
ML/NJ
There should be a sentence break in my last post after ‘about’
ML/NJ
Some good stuff, thanx for the ping.
Have you ever seen one of record books? They are huge.
Have you ever copied a page from one?
If so have you ever gotten the page to be exactly square and on point in the corner 0,0 for instance? Hmmm
He announced his candidacy Feb. 2007. The factcheck b/c is stamped June 2007. The DNC and Pelosi claimed he was eligible Aug. 2008. What was happening in April or May of 2007 that suddenly required him to produce a b/c? That would have been a couple months after he declared he was running so that might have been it even though it was very early in the game.
ML/NJ
Winston pulls crap out of his rear end or any other place he can find it.
Is it true that CNN flew Waidelich to Hawaii so he could ask for his birth certificate, only to try to prove the undisputed fact that a COLB is the default when a person requests their BC?
If that is all they were trying to prove, they could have asked anybody off the street in Hawaii to do the same and saved themselves the cost of the flights. They chose Waidelich specifically for the purpose of showing this BC#, which according to what both Janice Okubo and the HDOH Administrative Rules say is anomalous.
The more I see, the more I think CNN, the HDOH, and the folks at Fogbow had this thing planned in advance. By 6:17AM the morning after this piece aired on CNN I had a post at my blog from a Fogbow member pointing out that Waidelich’s number supposedly refutes the BC numbering claim made by Janice Okubo. Right on cue.
Somebody on my blog mentioned seeing conversation on Fogbow about one of their people calling in on a show where Corsi was being interviewed, presumably with the comment that the Waidelich BC# “proves” that the numbers were not given sequentially. And that commenter on my blog said that every time Corsi is on the air, there is somebody who makes that claim about Waidelich’s BC#. So there seems to be a deliberate campaign to use this BC# in order to get rid of questions about Obama’s BC#/date filed problem - and it started before daybreak the day after CNN aired the program.
What the HDOH, CNN, and the Fogbow folks don’t want to address is the FACT that Virginia Sunahara is in their birth index and yet they told me that they have no birth record for her. They also told me that nobody had requested her records, even though *I* had requested her record and they should have told me that they couldn’t do a search without knowing the name of the requestor.
They also don’t want to address the FACT that the HDOH has manipulated their 1960-64 birth index to allow legally-invalid records to be included.
You are absolutely right that anything from the HDOH can’t be trusted. I’ve got posts up at my blog which detail the lawlessness of that agency. If we had the rule of law any more there should have been a criminal investigation launched a long, long time ago - to investigate the actions of THE HDOH at the very least.
Showing the transaction logs for Virginia Sunahara, Barack Hussein Obama II, and Stig Waidelich would not compromise anybody’s privacy because the logs would only say when the record was created or accessed and what kind of action was taken on it. No information from the record itself would be disclosed. Anybody who wants to argue about the genuineness of either Obama’s or Waidelich’s record should be asked whether they believe the Hawaii government should disclose the transaction logs for these records so that the INTEGRITY OF THE HDOH can be put to public scrutiny.
I know of no reason why anybody should question that. But we’ll see what responses we get when we ask the defenders of both the Obama and Waidelich BC#’s whether they support compelling the HI government to disclose the transaction logs.
BookMark Bump
May God give us strength.
Tatt
ROTFMAOPIMP!!!!!!
You're funnier than Lauren and Hardy. Thanks for the chuckles.
You have done a fine job of presenting, as usual. You have to admit that this particular entrant, while still wrong in many aspects, was very meticulous, and showed his work well.
You have to respect that in a conspirists. Most of them just link to other conspirists. It’s nice to see someone take pride in their work, even if it is wrong.
Nordyes’ say “Honolulu, Oahu” and 0h0m0’s says “Honolulu, Hawaii”.
Hm.
I would not doubt it. A check for his home address would help. There is no doubt that this was coordinated between Hawaii, the liberal news organs, and the White House. It all started to come together when Obama first said he was born in Hawaii talking to a crowd (and to ABC Steffy Snuffilufigous Interview) on the 13th or 14th of April. They were all ready to implement their game plan by that date. Before then, Obama would talk around it by saying I grew up in Hawaii, or I went to school in Hawaii, or he talked in a weird third person voice who said he was born in Hawaii.
The lying never stops with these guys. Virginia Sunahara as seen in the Hawaiian Department of Heath records:
And here too:
Does a dead person have a right to privacy? I don't think so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
