You have done a fine job of presenting, as usual. You have to admit that this particular entrant, while still wrong in many aspects, was very meticulous, and showed his work well.
You have to respect that in a conspirists. Most of them just link to other conspirists. It’s nice to see someone take pride in their work, even if it is wrong.
Oh, I agree. I'll go further than that. I believe that Mr. Vogt is a technically competent man who sincerely believed what he wrote.
Even a technically competent evaluator can sometimes look at a phenomenon and put an incorrect interpretation on it. Especially on the first encounter, when no one has yet brought up an objection to the validity of that interpretation.
You have to respect that in a conspirist. Most of them just link to other conspirists. It’s nice to see someone take pride in their work, even if it is wrong.
I do agree.