Posted on 02/14/2011 5:19:20 AM PST by Alaphiah123
It is the 3,000 lb gorilla in the middle of American politics. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro eligible to be president of the United States of America? And if he isn’t, why is everyone who has a sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States allowing an illegitimate Usurper to continue his personal quest to undermine the fundamental principles of a Constitution-based federal republic form of government rather than protect the constitution, which is their sworn oath to do? (see story)
What is absolutely true and in the words of former President Clinton’s U.S. counter terrorism official Richard Clarke. Our government has failed us. Moreover, it is continuing to fail us on the must import constitutional question to come about in the history of the United States of America. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro Constitutionally qualified to be Commander-in-Chief of this nation?
(Excerpt) Read more at creatingorwellianworld-view-alaphiah.blogspot.com ...
Why not just post it here?
no need to dig deeper - or follow the link to your blog - the reason is because the ruling class protects its own.
Perhaps the Messiah wasn’t even born at all...He just “happened” upon the scene and our having faith in him is more important than any eligibility criteria. Yeah, right.
"We first heard of an undocumented man named Obama ,
Who initially denied his ties to Kenya, Communists and Osama.
But at every turn, the caitiff tyrant worked to have our country defeated,
With every enemy, invader and disaster, he schemed to have us deleted,
One testicle between Congress and the military might have prevented our final trauma."
unless, and until, the Courts or the states force his feet to the fire, this is a dead issue.
Why?
Because there’s no good way out.
In the first place, it would be a bitter and long fight to remove him, possibly lasting through this first term. A constitutional crisis, bound to tear the country apart politically. Then what?
He stays, the country is damaged through policy that will be hard to undo.
He’s forced out, the country is damaged through revolt & riot.
There’s no good outcome.
Best to keep him corralled as much as possible and force an orderly change of power in 2012.
Not sure I agree, but I lived through Watergate. Not to mention Lewinsky. When Washington is studying its own belly button, we’re soft targets from the outside.
Horse is out of the barn. This may be one for history to record so we don’t make the same mistake again.
Why not just post the whole article if it is your blog?
The New York State Supreme Court, last month, found the New York Board of Elections guilty of fraud for certifying a British citizen (Barack H. Obama) as eligible to be the 2008 candidate for POTUS.
The MSM hushed that one up and hid it away, didn’t they?
Virtually zero news coverage.
What part of a court has ruled Obama is not eligible is unclear?
SCOTUS is not going to hear this issue. I think they have made it abundantly clear by kicking out case after case. They are hoping the Congress will take care of it. Personally I think the states will take care of it. At least 5-10 states are going to make Barry cough up the long form BC to get on the 2012 ballot. That is when the rubber will meet the road.
Please. Leave the SCOUTS out of this argument. They have NO dog in this fight. I don’t know why people are always dragging the SCOUTS into political fights.
The SCOTUS would have to overturn a Federal judge’s decision that since Congress certified Obama as POTUS, then he is POTUS until Congress removes him from office through impeachment.
At this point, it would be quickest to challenge his ability to run for a second term. This would happen as soon as he registers as a candidate.
Nevertheless, a lack of SCOTUS action on this matter has set a terrible precident. The head-in-the-sand mentality has weakened the Constitution.
The entire article...
Monday, February 14, 2011
A Message to the SCOTUS: Stop Avoiding the Eligibility Issue
A veteran attorney who has pursued a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility since he was elected is telling the U.S. Supreme Court that if its members continue to “avoid” the dispute they effectively will “destroy the constitutional rule of law basis of our legal system.” –Bob Unruh, Worldnetdaily
It is the 3,000 lb gorilla in the middle of American politics. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro eligible to be president of the United States of America? And if he isn’t, why is everyone who has a sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States allowing an illegitimate Usurper to continue his personal quest to undermine the fundamental principles of a Constitution-based federal republic form of government rather than protect the constitution, which is their sworn oath to do? (see story)
What is absolutely true and in the words of former President Clinton’s U.S. counter terrorism official Richard Clarke. Our government has failed us. Moreover, it is continuing to fail us on the must import constitutional question to come about in the history of the United States of America. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro Constitutionally qualified to be Commander-in-Chief of this nation?
It is on this question, which the fate of our nation turns. This question will determine whether we will continue on as a Constructional-based federal republic or whether we will devolve into something, which exists only in the mind of a man and his likes that have obvious penis envy of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Trotsky.
Media, Senators, Congressmen and Congresswomen, Judges and Justices all have played along with and are complicit in capitulating to one man’s and one Party’s assault on the very framework which distinguishes this nation from Communists, Socialists, Religious and Banana Republic disasters that consider themselves governments.
May I remind you that this nation, a constitutional republic, is a state where the head of state and other officials are representatives of the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government’s power over all of its citizens. And this is a good thing.
The fact that a constitution exists that limits the government’s power makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, and that their decisions are subject to judicial review makes a state republican.—Wikipedia (source)
When a man or Oligarchy chooses to work outside of or above the constitutional charter this is a bad thing. This is the very thing that is alleged of Barry Hussein Soetoro regarding his failure to clear up the questions concerning his eligibility or lack thereof.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.—Article 2 Section1, U.S. Constitution
This is also the case if the surrounding powers, the Legislative and the Judiciary, branches that are both aware of a possible gross Constitutional violation, but chose to ignore the constitutional violation on grounds that it is much too uncomfortable to deal with.
It is no secret that this president holds the constitution in contempt. He views it as a Negative restrictive antiquated document that is against tyrannical government. (hear 1:45min audio)
Negative Constitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jr9mLB3yKs&feature=player_embedded
As radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the constitution.
At least it’s been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that—that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you but it doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted.–Barry Hussein Soetoro
President Soetoro has said that the Constitution is flawed and everything that he is doing indicates that he and his presidency are engaged in changing what he believes are the constitution’s flawed orientation of “negative liberties.” Soetoro wishes to change what he considers negative into that of “Positive Subjugation” of your thoughts and your actions. (see 1:29min video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_xNyrzB0xI&feature=player_embedded
This president believes that the Constitution can be interpreted many ways. As a result, he is in the process of stacking the court with politicos who will interpret the constitution in-line with his beliefs rather than the principle of considering the Founders’ intent. (see :21sec video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJPPaeHxSuo&feature=player_embedded
It is also true that this president holds the present Conservatives on the Supreme Court and its current 5 to 4 Conservative make-up in contempt. It is my personal belief that he has already co-opted a major Conservative on the Court thereby almost ensuring that the court will not hear any eligibility questions until a Conservative president appoints a true Conservative to replace any liberal or compromised Conservative. (see 2:09 min video)
Soetoro shows contempt for Supreme Court Justices
We must know whether Chief Justice Roberts and the Supremes are still committed to the principle of considering the Founders’ intent when ruling on constitutional issues. Or we must know whether they share the president’s views that the founders and the document, which they passed on to us, are flawed and outdated.
Thereby giving certain citizens the right to disregard all or part of the constitution as this president has chosen to do regarding immigration laws, violating person sovereignty and rights by unconstitutional attempting to force Americans to buy healthcare and by disregarding Article 2 section 1 of the eligibility cause of the Constitution.
If the Supreme Court continues to avoid the eligibility issue, they will be responsible for an Egypt like response to what people will perceive as a totally corrupt government.
Posted by Alaphiah at 3:30 AM
The only court case I have found recently that actually ruled on Obama’s eligibility is the Ankeny vs. the governer of Indiana. In it the court stated;
Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by [the US Supreme Court in 1898 in the case of US v] Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States natural-born citizens.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels, Nov. 12, 2009.
They are using the Wong Kim Ark case as precedent. I think the Wong Kim Ark case was decided wrongly and that just because you are born on US Soil should not make you a natural born citizen. However, I don't see the supremes reversing the Wong Kim Ark decision. I think for those of us that believe only someone born of two US citizens on American soil should be eligible for president we will need to push a constitutional amendment.
Silly question. They already have granted the bastard dispensation and re-emphasized it by ignoring any case coming to them. The pirate Roberts is there for a reason known to the globalist but completely hidden from We The People ... this is no longer a We The People Republiuc. Gte used to it ‘cause it’s not going to get better anytime soon.
Silly question. They already have granted the bastard dispensation and re-emphasized it by ignoring any case coming to them. The pirate Roberts is there for a reason known to the globalist but completely hidden from We The People ... this is no longer a We The People Republic. Get used to it ‘cause it’s not going to get better anytime soon. The final crash of the U.S. economy is rushing toward us faster than we can even comprehend.
I don't think the founding fathers would have agreed to this. I also think it doesn't make sense. The founders put the NBC clause for the presidency for a reason.
This is why we need a constitutional amendment clarifying this once and for all. The only people who should be eligible for president is someone born of two US Citizens on American soil. Possibly an exception for those born of two US Citizens that are in the military overseas. And that would be it.
However, I think most of the sheeple would be swayed by the lame stream media that this is discriminatory and it would have no chance of passing.
Does anyone honestly believe SCOTUS would render any other verdict than this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.