Why not just post it here?
no need to dig deeper - or follow the link to your blog - the reason is because the ruling class protects its own.
Perhaps the Messiah wasn’t even born at all...He just “happened” upon the scene and our having faith in him is more important than any eligibility criteria. Yeah, right.
"We first heard of an undocumented man named Obama ,
Who initially denied his ties to Kenya, Communists and Osama.
But at every turn, the caitiff tyrant worked to have our country defeated,
With every enemy, invader and disaster, he schemed to have us deleted,
One testicle between Congress and the military might have prevented our final trauma."
unless, and until, the Courts or the states force his feet to the fire, this is a dead issue.
Why?
Because there’s no good way out.
In the first place, it would be a bitter and long fight to remove him, possibly lasting through this first term. A constitutional crisis, bound to tear the country apart politically. Then what?
He stays, the country is damaged through policy that will be hard to undo.
He’s forced out, the country is damaged through revolt & riot.
There’s no good outcome.
Best to keep him corralled as much as possible and force an orderly change of power in 2012.
Not sure I agree, but I lived through Watergate. Not to mention Lewinsky. When Washington is studying its own belly button, we’re soft targets from the outside.
Horse is out of the barn. This may be one for history to record so we don’t make the same mistake again.
Why not just post the whole article if it is your blog?
The New York State Supreme Court, last month, found the New York Board of Elections guilty of fraud for certifying a British citizen (Barack H. Obama) as eligible to be the 2008 candidate for POTUS.
The MSM hushed that one up and hid it away, didn’t they?
Virtually zero news coverage.
What part of a court has ruled Obama is not eligible is unclear?
SCOTUS is not going to hear this issue. I think they have made it abundantly clear by kicking out case after case. They are hoping the Congress will take care of it. Personally I think the states will take care of it. At least 5-10 states are going to make Barry cough up the long form BC to get on the 2012 ballot. That is when the rubber will meet the road.
Please. Leave the SCOUTS out of this argument. They have NO dog in this fight. I don’t know why people are always dragging the SCOUTS into political fights.
The entire article...
Monday, February 14, 2011
A Message to the SCOTUS: Stop Avoiding the Eligibility Issue
A veteran attorney who has pursued a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility since he was elected is telling the U.S. Supreme Court that if its members continue to “avoid” the dispute they effectively will “destroy the constitutional rule of law basis of our legal system.” –Bob Unruh, Worldnetdaily
It is the 3,000 lb gorilla in the middle of American politics. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro eligible to be president of the United States of America? And if he isn’t, why is everyone who has a sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States allowing an illegitimate Usurper to continue his personal quest to undermine the fundamental principles of a Constitution-based federal republic form of government rather than protect the constitution, which is their sworn oath to do? (see story)
What is absolutely true and in the words of former President Clinton’s U.S. counter terrorism official Richard Clarke. Our government has failed us. Moreover, it is continuing to fail us on the must import constitutional question to come about in the history of the United States of America. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro Constitutionally qualified to be Commander-in-Chief of this nation?
It is on this question, which the fate of our nation turns. This question will determine whether we will continue on as a Constructional-based federal republic or whether we will devolve into something, which exists only in the mind of a man and his likes that have obvious penis envy of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Trotsky.
Media, Senators, Congressmen and Congresswomen, Judges and Justices all have played along with and are complicit in capitulating to one man’s and one Party’s assault on the very framework which distinguishes this nation from Communists, Socialists, Religious and Banana Republic disasters that consider themselves governments.
May I remind you that this nation, a constitutional republic, is a state where the head of state and other officials are representatives of the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government’s power over all of its citizens. And this is a good thing.
The fact that a constitution exists that limits the government’s power makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, and that their decisions are subject to judicial review makes a state republican.—Wikipedia (source)
When a man or Oligarchy chooses to work outside of or above the constitutional charter this is a bad thing. This is the very thing that is alleged of Barry Hussein Soetoro regarding his failure to clear up the questions concerning his eligibility or lack thereof.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.—Article 2 Section1, U.S. Constitution
This is also the case if the surrounding powers, the Legislative and the Judiciary, branches that are both aware of a possible gross Constitutional violation, but chose to ignore the constitutional violation on grounds that it is much too uncomfortable to deal with.
It is no secret that this president holds the constitution in contempt. He views it as a Negative restrictive antiquated document that is against tyrannical government. (hear 1:45min audio)
Negative Constitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jr9mLB3yKs&feature=player_embedded
As radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the constitution.
At least it’s been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that—that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you but it doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted.–Barry Hussein Soetoro
President Soetoro has said that the Constitution is flawed and everything that he is doing indicates that he and his presidency are engaged in changing what he believes are the constitution’s flawed orientation of “negative liberties.” Soetoro wishes to change what he considers negative into that of “Positive Subjugation” of your thoughts and your actions. (see 1:29min video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_xNyrzB0xI&feature=player_embedded
This president believes that the Constitution can be interpreted many ways. As a result, he is in the process of stacking the court with politicos who will interpret the constitution in-line with his beliefs rather than the principle of considering the Founders’ intent. (see :21sec video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJPPaeHxSuo&feature=player_embedded
It is also true that this president holds the present Conservatives on the Supreme Court and its current 5 to 4 Conservative make-up in contempt. It is my personal belief that he has already co-opted a major Conservative on the Court thereby almost ensuring that the court will not hear any eligibility questions until a Conservative president appoints a true Conservative to replace any liberal or compromised Conservative. (see 2:09 min video)
Soetoro shows contempt for Supreme Court Justices
We must know whether Chief Justice Roberts and the Supremes are still committed to the principle of considering the Founders’ intent when ruling on constitutional issues. Or we must know whether they share the president’s views that the founders and the document, which they passed on to us, are flawed and outdated.
Thereby giving certain citizens the right to disregard all or part of the constitution as this president has chosen to do regarding immigration laws, violating person sovereignty and rights by unconstitutional attempting to force Americans to buy healthcare and by disregarding Article 2 section 1 of the eligibility cause of the Constitution.
If the Supreme Court continues to avoid the eligibility issue, they will be responsible for an Egypt like response to what people will perceive as a totally corrupt government.
Posted by Alaphiah at 3:30 AM
Supreme Court of the United States Docket No. 08A505
Title: Philip J. Berg, Applicant
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 18 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008 Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.
Jan 21 2009 Application (08A505) denied by the Court.
Obama Eligibility Appeal at the Supreme Court. Mr. Beverly wanted the Federal Elections Commission to investigate the eligiblity of Barack Obama.
Supreme Court of the United States Docket No. 09-794
Title: Arnold Dewalt Beverly, Petitioner
v.
Federal Election Commission
Docketed: January 5, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-15562)
Decision Date: July 1, 2009
Rehearing Denied: September 30, 2009
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 8 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2010)
Dec 8 2009 Appendix of Arnold Dewalt Beverly filed.
Jan 29 2010 Waiver of right of respondent Federal Election Commission to respond filed.
Feb 3 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2010.
Feb 16 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 26, 2010.
Feb 16 2010 Supplemental brief of petitioner Arnold Dewalt Beverly filed. (Distributed)
Mar 1 2010 Petition DENIED.
Obama eligibility appeals at the Supreme Court: Craig v US
Mr. Craig’s complaint addressed the alleged distinction between the rights of citizenship that attach to naturalized citizens and those that attach to natural-born citizens. Mr. Craig asserted that he, as a “Legacy,” or natural-born citizen, suffered from discrimination due to “exclusion of distinctions” and “omission of acknowledgement” due to Congress’s failure to enact laws recognizing this distinction, whereas it has enacted laws defining the requirements to become a naturalized citizen. Mr. Craig thus sought redress in the form of a declaratory judgment defining “natural born Citizen,” as it appears in art. II, § 1, cl. 4 of the Constitution, and providing a means for citizens bearing that title to obtain certification of that fact from the federal government, as well as punitive damages.
Supreme Court of the United States Docket No. 08-10817
Title: Steven Lee Craig, Petitioner
v.
United States
Docketed: June 10, 2009
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-6082)
Rule 11
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
May 22 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 10, 2009)
Jun 17 2009 Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Jun 25 2009 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2009.
Jul 8 2009 Supplemental brief of petitioner Steven Lee Craig filed. (Distributed)
Oct 5 2009 Petition DENIED.
Obama Eligibility Appeals at the Supreme Court: Donofrio v Wells.
“Donofrio v. Wells” was a suit that attempted to keep Obama off the New Jersey ballot. Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick claimed Obama had dual nationality at birth, because of his Kansas-born mother and his Kenyan-born father, who was a British subject at the time of his son’s birth.
Supreme Court of the United States Docket No. 08A407
Title: Leo C. Donofrio, Applicant
v.
Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Case Nos.: (AM-0153-08T2 at the New Jersey Appellate Division without a docket number)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A407) for stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 6 2008 Application (08A407) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 14 2008 Application (08A407) refiled and submitted to Justice Thomas.
Nov 19 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008.
Nov 19 2008 Application (08A407) referred to the Court by Justice Thomas.
Nov 26 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Leo C. Donofrio filed. (Distributed)
Dec 1 2008 Letter from applicant dated November 22, 2008, received.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A407) denied by the Court.
He hysterically shouted over and over that the Usurper's eligibility should not be in question and that this issue has absolutely NOTHING to do with the well-being of our country.
This segment of his show was unbelievable, unreal, Orwellian.
Leni