When you look at how much the left has actually admitted it becomes terrifying to contemplate what they are hiding.
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
bookmark
Notice that the standard is written fuzzily so that old people who are still “valuable” will still get health care. I assume this means govt officials and tenured professors and the like.
He sounds like Doctor Josef Mengle. You know certain elderly groups will get exemptions - i.e. my guess is elderly whites health care will be the first to get cut off.
The seniors who voted for Obama are fools. The Emanuel family is evil.
Nifty solution to the social security issue. Now the government can keep that money instead of having to pay it out to seniors who reach retirement age since everyone will be killed off at the cutoff.
Here we go again....”Lancet article.”
Lancet = fail, on varying methodology and political bias levels.
He came to power in 1933. Most people did not understand until 1936 We are being warned about BHO's associates. It may take three years for all to understand Adolf Hitler wrote all of his plans
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
in Mein Kampf in 1925.
that he really meant what he wrote.
what is planned for the weak, the old and the infirmed.
“When you look at how much the left has actually admitted it becomes terrifying to contemplate what they are hiding.” - wagglebee
“Everything about socialism is sham and affectation” - Frederic Bastiat, “Economic Harmonies” 23.11 Evil
Thanks to all posters.
bookmark
I suppose life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are likewise not basic in the mind of this heartless RAT, but also subject to age rationing?
“Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years. Treating 65-year olds differently because of stereotypes or falsehoods would be ageist; treating them differently because they have already had more life-years is not.”
In Rush’s words, GOBBLEDY GOOK!
New age, feelgood babble but in reality he says nothing except kill the oldies!
The One is on record saying babies born alive from botched abortions should not be given medical treatment. And now that seniors should not be given medical treatment and moved into hospices after mandatory "End of Life" counseling.
"C'mon, buddy, we can't afford this. Time for you to go..."
Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu
Fast-tracked Swine Flu Vaccine under Fire:Toxic adjuvants in flu vaccines
When the government can decide who has a right to life then you have NO rights that the government can't take away. Only loyal party members are participating citizens.
I keep getting this comment from a sister.
Also, the president has repeated numerously that if you already have health insurance that you are happy with you do not have to take this. I like the option that if I lose a job or quit I can take this health insurance rather than a costly COBRA.
Please provide me with several of the best answers to this. Links, both factual and well worded opinions, supporting each answer would also be good.
Help me as this sister is surrounded by liberals. I don't want her turning against me. I have difficulty keeping my own arguments clear in any verbal instruction without good instructions because (as anyone who knows me) I so easily can be sent off chasing tangents.
Thanks.
Av
So, Emanuel wants to be the “decider”. Piss on him. He needs to be stood against the wall.
Evidently not enough reading has been done. I’ve read the articles (both referred to here) and this is total BS. I urge people to read the good doctor’s articles themselves.
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel is a great an compassionate man. His Lancet article (which is a great read BTW) is about how one should allocate care in terrible situations when you cannot save everyone. The quote about dementia in the other article, crucially misses the whole point by ignoring the next few lines in the actual article. When he’s talking about “basic” care he’s referring to specific list of things which should be guaranteed to a normal patient capable of benefiting from them, such as say an Autistic child being guarantied educational therapy which would not benefit an someone suffering from dementia. In the later case another system would need to be in place to address effectively the needs of such an individual.
