Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Obama Countenance a Second Civil War?
From Sea to Shining Sea ^ | 1/20/09 | Purple Mountains

Posted on 01/20/2009 5:14:39 AM PST by PurpleMountains

In my opinion, the cultural war between secular-progressives and traditional Americans will become a violent, bloody war if the Democrats in Congress try to criminalize policy differences by trying to punish members of the Bush Administration for attempting (and succeeding) to protect American lives. Obama isn’t saying much, although he appointed Holder, but Pelosi, Conyers, Reid, Holder and others are mouthing some very dangerous thoughts. As a minimum, practices that were originated by Carter and Clinton and merely continued by the Bush Administration (such as rendition and warrantless wiretapping) will be given much publicity, and, beyond that, some of us will be forced to support some violent people we normally shun and despise.

(Excerpt) Read more at forthegrandchildren.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 111th; barackobama; cwii; cwiiping; democratcongress; democratparty; democrats; ericholder; holder; johnconyers; nancypelosi; obama; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last
To: SJSAMPLE
I agree, however, that it’s a little crazy to be talking about a second civil war.

However, when some fairly high up officials start talking about repealing term limits, organizing a national "civilian defense" corps, a new declaration of independence, nationalizing health care and every other industry they can get their fingers into, disarming the citizens, redistributing or "spreading the wealth," rampant secularism ...

That all sounds very, very socialist and unconstitutional to me. So yes, it may be crazy to be talking about it - now. But it certainly isn't insane to have the idea tickling the back of your mind. Just how much are you willing to let this country slide towards looking like East Germany in the 1970s?

I seriously doubt it will ever come to physical violence, but there is definitely going to be a clash of ideals in the next 4 years. Our "dear leaders" need to be reminded that they serve us, and serve at our pleasure. Anyone voted in can be voted out again. And while they may feel safe and secure with their few percentage point margin, that can change awfully quickly.

This is the age of the internet, the connected world. If (when, or "as") they screw up, we have to make sure our message gets out there and everyone sees the un-spun truth about their fiascoes. That is really our job. Not a civil-war revolution, but a revolution in thought and education. We know, we know the people that voted for Obama, Pelosi, and crew made a terrible mistake. We don't need guns and fighting in the streets to right that, we need information and bandwidth. The socialists will hang themselves.

21 posted on 01/20/2009 6:10:29 AM PST by CodeMasterPhilzar (I love my Country, but I now genuinely fear my government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs
Remember, this a-hole won pretty big. Most of this country, at the moment, is hoping for big things from him.

When you account for vote fraud I'd be willing to bet that Obama actually lost.

However, 53% of the vote is not "pretty big." Not only that, but how many of those Obama voters are having buyer's remorse (I know at least one - there are certainly more out there).

Most of the country that is hoping for big things from Obama is proof that you can, indeed, fool most of the people most of the time.

22 posted on 01/20/2009 6:11:41 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (Obama - what you get when you mix Affirmative Action with the Peter Principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texan Tory

Nope. If 0bama punishes Bush, he’ll leave himself open. Remember...he’s keeping many of the Bush policies intact that he could be punished for.”
__________________
But he won’t be punished for anything. Remember that the rules don’t apply to him. We’ve already seen that. obama can do anything he wants and his cheerleaders will just - cheer.

The war crimes idea was floated during the campaign. Will obama do it? Probably not until he’s assured that he has the majority of the country on his side.


23 posted on 01/20/2009 6:14:37 AM PST by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LRS

Total insanity has already taken over. Anyone not realizing this at this point in time is living in denial.


24 posted on 01/20/2009 6:14:51 AM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar

With the abrogation of the Constitutional contract today, as a Subpreme court judges swears in an affiramtive action fraud and knows he’s swearing in a likely ineligible ‘president-elect’, you won’t have long to wait to see the federal oligarchy spring into action. Democrats will never relinquish power again, and every crisis is their tool ... Rambo Emanuel has told US that already.


25 posted on 01/20/2009 6:16:18 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
53-47 is not "pretty big".

Your numbers are incorrect. Here are the correct numbers:

Popular vote: 69,456,897 to 59,934,786
Percentage: 52.9% to 45.7%

26 posted on 01/20/2009 6:19:18 AM PST by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

OK, 53-46.

Still not “pretty big”.


27 posted on 01/20/2009 6:26:32 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains
If oil prices start to raise over the next year Obama, Pelosi and Reid and the others will have to pull in their horns. If oil goes up to $60+ a barrel by November of this year and if these idiots want to stay in power they are going to have to allow a lot of drilling and exploration to help increase domestic supplies. (which they most likely will not) By November the next election cycle will be well under way and any stupid moves by the Dems on energy policy will make people angry and the loonie Dems will become vulnerable.
28 posted on 01/20/2009 6:36:47 AM PST by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

If Obama won 53% of the vote, then he did NOT win 47% of the vote. Some folks may not have voted for McCain, but you’re kinda missing the point if you look at the numbers in that way.


29 posted on 01/20/2009 6:42:31 AM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Sure it is. Absolutely. Are you joking?

It was the largest margin of popular vote victory by an non-incumbent in the nations history dude.


30 posted on 01/20/2009 6:42:56 AM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Camel Joe

Uh...what?


31 posted on 01/20/2009 6:43:35 AM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

I’m glad you agree with my premise, but 53% is huge by election standards. It was the largest NON-incumbent margin in U.S. history.


32 posted on 01/20/2009 6:44:35 AM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

He did lose pretty big. And who is talking about catering to the middle?

I am talking about ending the raving-right-wing-moon-bat ravings of a 2nd CW. That makes us look as lunatic as the libs.


33 posted on 01/20/2009 6:45:50 AM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

Ya know, I had hoped this neo-Confederate, pedantic argument would NOT have come up.

You’re wrong, but you won’t admit it and you’re not going to change my mind or drag me into yet another HOPLESS discussion of semantics over a war that happened over 100 years ago.


34 posted on 01/20/2009 6:47:32 AM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

No way he lost even with vote fraud. It was not 6% pts big.

And he did win big. See my other comments.

All of this is besides the point. The point is to stop with the “We’s gonna has us a 2nd civil war! Ye haw!” moonbattery. It’s not going to help us.


35 posted on 01/20/2009 6:49:08 AM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Remember, this a-hole won pretty big.
53-47 is not “pretty big”.

You're right about the “a-hole”, though.


The Country as a whole did not vote for this guy into office; a few dense(ly) populated large metro areas did. It is the classic city vs country, urban vs rural folk picture. Those who demand and receive the most from the government are his people. Those who do for themselves are not.

Get ready Heartland, USA. Those trendy urbanites need to eat. The guy at the head of the dinner table is not going to tell them to "make bread"; he is going to tell you to pass your breadbasket to them.

When it comes time to settle up, you are going to get the check because, after all, it was your bread. Adding insult to injury, he's then going to point out to you that your basket is empty and you really do need to be more productive because, after all, people are depending upon on you. ;)

Just how this happened looks pretty clear to me. Click the map below for the larger version:

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/red_election_map/2008/11/11/150126.html

36 posted on 01/20/2009 6:50:41 AM PST by shoutingandpointing (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs

Simple, it is not your place to tell others what to think or believe, that is now the work of the State. Before now it was a right that was fought for by men known as Free. We have always been at war with Oceania!


37 posted on 01/20/2009 7:00:45 AM PST by Camel Joe ("All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others"- The Pigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ripley
What makes for civil war is civil unrest, where a segment of society is willing to break things and kill people without regard for their own well being in order to achieve a specific goal, say, the protection of the constitution of the US. To get to that point, I think, people would have to be suffering great injustices, such as mass rounding up and imprisonment... to be made to suffer for things such as holding to political views that prevent the “progress” of those in power. As of now, we only suffer belittlings, and brayings, nothing to get up in arms over. Nevertheless, the time may come...
38 posted on 01/20/2009 7:00:56 AM PST by opaque soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs
All of this is besides the point. The point is to stop with the “We’s gonna has us a 2nd civil war! Ye haw!” moonbattery. It’s not going to help us.

If a second civil war is to come, it won't be conservatives who start it. We may respond by taking up arms, but it will be exactly that, a response.

39 posted on 01/20/2009 7:02:22 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (Obama - what you get when you mix Affirmative Action with the Peter Principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Camel Joe

Oh. How profound. Orwell and all.

You’re a genius. Hey, I bet you NEVER express an opinion here huh?


40 posted on 01/20/2009 7:03:46 AM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson