Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Intelligent Design Theory Scientific?
Russ Paielli ^ | 2006-10-01 | Russ Paielli

Posted on 10/01/2006 4:18:53 PM PDT by RussP

----cut----

The notion that Intelligent Design theory is fundamentally "unscientific" is based on the philosophy originated by Karl Popper (1902-1994), who postulated a set of rules for science known as "Falsificationism." The main idea is that a hypothesis or theory does not qualify as "scientific" unless it is "falsifiable" (which is independent of whether it is actually "true" or "false"). Popper is revered by evolutionists, but certainly even they would agree that we should not blindly accept his word as revealed truth. So let us consider some of the implications of his "falsifiability" criterion.

----cut----

The ultimate irony here is that, given Popper's definition of science, the Neo-Darwinian Theory of Evolution itself is based on an "unscientific" foundation. How did the first living cell come to be? If Intelligent Design is categorically rejected, then that first cell must have come together more or less by random chance. Mathematicians and physicists have argued (and claim to have proved) that the simplest conceivable living cell is far too complex to have come together by random chance, but evolutionists always reply that, given enough time and space, "anything" can happen. In this case, the evolutionists are correct: proving that the first cell could not have formed by random chance is impossible. But that is just another way of saying that any purely naturalistic theory of abiogenesis is unfalsifiable, hence "unscientific" according to Popper's falsifiability criterion. [When cornered with this undeniable fact, evolutionists usually claim that abiogenesis is "separate" from evolution. But that's not quite true: evolution depends on abiogenesis. Evolution obviously could not have occurred if the first living cell had never come into existence!]

----cut----

(Excerpt) Read more at russp.org ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abiogenesis; creationism; evolution; falsifiability; idiocy; idjunkscience; ignorance; intelligentdesign; science; seti
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-410 next last
To: FairWitness

Excuse me, but all theories are incomplete, to only point out evolution is political, not scientific.

To point out evolution selectively as the only theory that is incomplete, is nothing more then kissing up to the religious fundametalists, and giving them more power to attempt to ram their religious beliefs into a science classroom.


61 posted on 10/01/2006 6:02:09 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RussP
Is Intelligent Design Theory Scientific?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

62 posted on 10/01/2006 6:03:23 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (A wall first. A wall now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairWitness

Yes, you would not want to become collateral damage would you, victims of collateral damage are statistics, and I know that I would never want to be a statistic.


63 posted on 10/01/2006 6:04:13 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: FairWitness
I wish undiluted science were taught in science class and people would stop making excuses for the Luddite idiots attacking science with witch-burning frenzy. I can't imagine a truce under the conditions in which it's almost impossible to post and discuss a science article on FR without snake-handlers showing up to announce that most of us are going to Hell.

Science should not be a compromising enterprise. A systematic study of nature should not be negotiating its results, never mind with what class of people.

64 posted on 10/01/2006 6:05:07 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarbhzrd
If we had a designer, he hates us, and he's evil, and sadistic.

Oversimplification, with many unproven assumptions.

Nice try, though.

65 posted on 10/01/2006 6:05:55 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarbhzrd
Admitted ignorance PLACEMARKER.

(Ignorance as a non-perjorative, by the way...)

Cheers!

66 posted on 10/01/2006 6:07:19 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

It was a joke, humor?

Many of us Evilutionists do have a sense of humor, and will let it slip into these discussions now and again.


67 posted on 10/01/2006 6:09:01 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarbhzrd
Humor, perhaps.

I recall the old Mad Magazine cartoon with the know-it-all elderly priest with a finger in the air, saying to a disgruntled teen, "And always remember that God loves you."

To which the teen retorts: "Imagine what it would be like if He hated me."

Full Disclosure: It looked like flame bait, intending to get a bunch of responses along the lines of "Burn in Hell, Sinner!"

If you want to help elevate the discourse, starting like that isn't always the best move.

Cheers!

68 posted on 10/01/2006 6:14:14 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
snake handlers, Luddites, withces

Off topic. Not here.

69 posted on 10/01/2006 6:20:50 PM PDT by cornelis (Fecisti nos ad te)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarbhzrd

Why? Simply because you don't like what he did? Or becasue you think you could do a better job?

Anyone who knew as much as a entity intelligent and powerful enough to create an entire universe and the life in it, would then be in a position to critique it.

As it is, how can beings as limited in perspective and knowledge as humans are, even think they can come close to knowing enough to understand why things were created they way they were?


70 posted on 10/01/2006 6:22:57 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I see what you mean, see, post 70. LOL

Oh well, can't expect everyone to have a sense of humor.


71 posted on 10/01/2006 6:24:49 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Much of what we surmise about 4.5 billions of years ago requires rational/logical deductions.


72 posted on 10/01/2006 6:26:29 PM PDT by cornelis (Fecisti nos ad te)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: RussP

As both sides worry about the past, the present is passing you by.


73 posted on 10/01/2006 6:27:53 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
Very funny. There are maybe four anti-E posters on FR who swear they aren't creatonists but use every argument AiG and ICR ever wrote. Really convincing! Of the rest, all are openly sure that God is the Designer.

The argument from design is not a theological argument, because we aren't necessarily talking about God. But any rebuttal of the design argument is theological, because it requires us to say "God wouldn't do it this way", and this is not legitimate.
"The Quixotic Message", or "No Free Hunch"
74 posted on 10/01/2006 6:33:33 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarbhzrd
You haven't been around long enough. I am one of the main punsters on crevo threads.

I just get tired of provocations to flame wars on both sides.

Cheers!

75 posted on 10/01/2006 6:36:43 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
But any rebuttal of the design argument is theological, because it requires us to say "God wouldn't do it this way", and this is not legitimate.

May or may not be legitimate, but (as so many point out on these threads) it sure isn't science!

Otherwise, we agree completely on this.

Cheers!

76 posted on 10/01/2006 6:38:53 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
I think questions of origins are very important. For example, I think it is an profound conclusion to say certain aspects of 4.5 billion years ago are unkowable.

Of course the study of biological processes can proceed without a theory of origins; even so, but that life originated independent of biological processes

77 posted on 10/01/2006 6:40:59 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

Why is it like that?


78 posted on 10/01/2006 6:46:45 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

isn't exactly what textbooks are in the business of saying.


79 posted on 10/01/2006 6:47:14 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

IOW, if you, js1138, and this new cracker think it don't matter, why does it matter so much for the biology curriculum?


80 posted on 10/01/2006 6:51:10 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-410 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson