Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A true blowout is now possible
RealClearPolitics ^ | 6 October 2006 | Suart Rothenberg

Posted on 10/08/2006 11:26:23 AM PDT by YaYa123

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: wagglebee

Ten points is still a pretty good gap, and those last few points are hard to come by. Further, this is from a poll commisioned by Irey's campaign. Those are often inaccurate, at least from my experience.

It's good that she's closing, but I'm not sure she can finish it off in four weeks.


21 posted on 10/08/2006 11:45:59 AM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Proving the MSM wrong....my pleasure!!


22 posted on 10/08/2006 11:46:19 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

MSM baloney.


23 posted on 10/08/2006 11:47:53 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The Democrats have convinced their people to vote already. Now they are convincing, through Mark Foley and general Republican incompetence, for core conservative voters not to vote.


24 posted on 10/08/2006 11:48:46 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

The Ds could take all 435 seats in the House. It is possible since all seats are up for election. Don Young will keep his seat, that's one certainty. So 434 seats. Can Don Young, the fourth most powerful Representative in DC combat 434 Ds? YES! One against 434 sounds like steep odds, but that doesn't take the power of Don Young into account.


25 posted on 10/08/2006 11:53:21 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Rothenberg is a smart cookie, but he IS a Democrat. If Charlie Cook wrote the same thing (he's usually paired with Rothenberg and is a Republican), THEN I would be a tad nervous.

Despite the Foley matter, I stand by my prediction of Republicans down 7 in the House, and down two in the Senate unless Steele pulls it out against Cardin in Maryland. It is now fairly clear that one of the Republican losses will be here in my District, NC 11th. A 16-year incumbent Congressman (who doesn't belong in Congress) is going to be beaten by Heath Shuler, an inexperienced empty suit who used to play football.

Like Tip O'Neill used to say, "all politics are local." This year, at least most politics will be local at the margins among the voters, which is all that counts on election day.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "Sex, Politics, and Hypocrisy"

Please see my most recent new statement on running for Congress, here.

26 posted on 10/08/2006 11:53:26 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Have a look-see. Please get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

It ain't over until it's over.

No fat lady has yet gotten up to sing. There is still the small incidental event of actually having an election, doncha see.

The Dem'crats tripped the flag about three weeks too soon on this Foley deal, so there was time to deconstruct the genesis and the play in the media. The whole story is falling apart.

Since they have essentially wasted this opportunity, the Dem'crats may still have yet another one waiting to drop in the first days of November. But badly timed "news" releases have the unfortunate effect of resulting in diminishing returns. No matter how timely or seemingly plausible the next release is, it will undergo far greater scrutiny, and have far less impact, than the "Foleygate" scare had, beginning from the first hours of its announcement.

The early release of this Foley story was most likely a direct result of the Chris Wallace interview on Fox, when the fit hit the "Shan". That was truly an uncontrolled moment that went badly for the "Shan" (previously known as the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001). The Foley story release was an effort to distract the public from the really bad performance by the "Shan".

Not just a has-been. He is, and forever shall be, a "never-was".


27 posted on 10/08/2006 11:55:13 AM PDT by alloysteel (In war, disproportionate force is the ONLY way to assure victory and subsequent peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

It is indeed local and there is no Gingrich this time to make it a quasi-national thing. Sometimes the odds break in your favor, and this is one of those times.


28 posted on 10/08/2006 11:58:03 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

There just don't seem to be any smash-mouth fighters on the Republican side.


29 posted on 10/08/2006 12:02:00 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Rothenberg blew the 2000 and 2002 House control races and is not respected by the Right. I will by days ends give links to Stuies screw ups from Past elections.


30 posted on 10/08/2006 12:06:14 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
He is a victim of a deceitful Dem strategy of painting his opponent as pro-life. Casey will turn on the pro-lifers as soon as he is in office, just as Joe Crowley did, but Schumer has succeeded, it seems, in putting together this hybrid of a pro-life Democrat. Casey also carries his father's name and thus part of his reputation as a true pro-life Democrat. In a big union state with lots of Catholics, the Dems have created a convincing ideal candidate in Casey--but if he wins, just wait . . .

Santorum is one of our best senators and needs your support. I know people who are having trouble making ends meet who are scraping together money to send to him.

31 posted on 10/08/2006 12:08:43 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Without their key constituencies of necro-Americans, felon-Americans, non-Americans, fictional-Americans, and multi-Americans, the Democrats would win many fewer elections.


32 posted on 10/08/2006 12:08:45 PM PDT by 3niner (War is one game where the home team always loses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

[M]ost people are reluctant to vote THEIR congressman out of office without a good reason.

Reminds me of a principal known as "Fenno's Law," which states: "Congress stinks, but my Congressman is OK."

es


33 posted on 10/08/2006 12:14:39 PM PDT by eddiespaghetti ( with the meatball eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Our nation doesn't deserve a Democrat controlled Congress but the HOUSE has proved themselves to be inept without the likes of Delay and Newt and the Senate has been rendered useless with the likes of McCain and the 6 other RINO's.

Here's praying GW finds his VETO pen because he will have to use it OFTEN in the next two years.

34 posted on 10/08/2006 12:17:28 PM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

I have my hands full with candidates in my own state. I will leave Santorum to the good services of his constituents. I wish them luck.


35 posted on 10/08/2006 12:18:32 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

>Explain Santorum.

This hasn't helped:

http://saova.org/1139opponents.html
http://www.spanieljournal.com/20lbaughan.html
http://www.ncraoa.com/PDF/Rebuttal_SantorumSpeech8_22_05.pdf
http://pet-law.com/paws/ppa3.html

Rick's got people across the nation opposing his "pet" law.


36 posted on 10/08/2006 12:18:55 PM PDT by Darnright (http://media.putfile.com/Webb-on-Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Still waiting for Rove and the Republican October surprise.

Remember how we were dying in late October '04 waiting for Bush to get serious and make his move?

The big coons walk late in this game.

Meanwhile, I'm voting straight ticket Republican and against Sexual McCarthyism.


37 posted on 10/08/2006 12:19:33 PM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (Bush Assassination Flick. Save your liberal friends a few bucks: the black guy in the tux dunnit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eddiespaghetti

I live in a fairly conservative district, yet throughout the late 80's and all of the 90's we were represented by a moderate Democrat, after his second term the GOP didn't even run anyone against him and that includes 1994.

The bottom line is that the media is acting like this is a "slam dunk" but the reality is that they don't want to acknowledge how difficult it would be.


38 posted on 10/08/2006 12:20:54 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
"....the GOP is now flirting with disaster."

This is an understatement, but Like a poster said earlier on this thread - the GOP needs to attack.

If the GOP stakes out a defensive position instead of an offensive one, then I fear that the GOP is doomed on Nov 7.There is enough time left so that the Repubs ought to be able to go on the attack and keep both the House and Senate. This won't be for the weak spitited - and I must admit that I have been cought up in the cycle of doom and dispair - but the more optimistic we all can remain and if we can take the fight to the enemy....then I believe that we can send the DUnnies, once again, down the drain of dispair....and that is a wonderful sight to behold

39 posted on 10/08/2006 12:21:43 PM PDT by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

"the GOP needs to attack.
"

Well, in the Minnesota Senate race, the GOP candidate is attacking, and his strategy is backfiring quite spectacularly.

Despite advice from many, the only ads voters are hearing from him are stupid attack ads with no content. He didn't have much of a chance in the first place, but Kennedy has had exceptionally poor advice.

He will lose, and lose badly. I have washed my hands of him.


40 posted on 10/08/2006 12:24:09 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson