Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Evidence For Anthropic Theory That Fundamental Physics Constants Underlie Life-Enabling Universe
From Quarks to Quasars ^ | January 16, 2015 | FQIQ

Posted on 01/16/2015 10:58:49 AM PST by lbryce

Full Title:New Evidence For Anthropic Theory That Fundamental Physics Constants Underlie Life-Enabling Universe

For nearly half a century, theoretical physicists have made a series of discoveries that certain constants in fundamental physics seem extraordinarily fine-tuned to allow for the emergence of a life-enabling universe. Constants that crisscross the Standard Model of Particle Physics guided the formation of hydrogen nuclei during the Big Bang, along with the carbon and oxygen atoms initially fused at the center of massive first-generation stars that exploded as supernovae; these processes in turn set the stage for solar systems and planets capable of supporting carbon-based life dependent on water and oxygen.

The theory that an Anthropic Principle guided the physics and evolution of the universe was initially proposed by Brandon Carter while he was a post-doctoral researcher in astrophysics at the University of Cambridge; this theory was later debated by Cambridge scholar Stephen Hawking and a widening web of physicists around the world.

German scholar Ulf-G Meißner, chair in theoretical nuclear physics at the Helmholtz Institute, University of Bonn, adds to a series of discoveries that support this Anthropic Principle.

(Excerpt) Read more at fromquarkstoquasars.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; History; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: anthropic; anthropicprinciple; creationism; principle; stringtheory
Hawking and his ilk deny any such thing.
1 posted on 01/16/2015 10:58:49 AM PST by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I would tend to agree with them. Peter Higgs, for the moment, seems to have nailed it. Symmetry was broken within a trillionth of a trillionth of a second after the big bang.


2 posted on 01/16/2015 11:03:43 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Life and death are but temporary states. But Freedom endures forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

“Hawking and his ilk deny any such thing.”

Interesting that the author says in the article that he agrees with Hawking ...


3 posted on 01/16/2015 11:08:16 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

:I would tend to agree with them. Peter Higgs, for the moment, seems to have nailed it. Symmetry was broken within a trillionth of a trillionth of a second after the big bang.

I find nothing new in this article that strengthens the AP. Meanwhile, evidence for the teleological argument grows stronger. I like the question asked in the movie Signs, “there are two kinds of people: those who see signs, miracles, and those who see coincidences. Which kind are you?” I see purpose all around me, every day.

-Frank


4 posted on 01/16/2015 11:21:13 AM PST by thepoodlebites (and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The most “simple” of single-celled organisms are stupendously complex. It’s laughable to believe such stupendous complexity could arise from random processes. For those who disagree, throw some chemicals together and create life from scratch. Then get back with me.

In reality, life springing from lifeless chemicals is about as scientific as wishful thinking.


5 posted on 01/16/2015 11:29:57 AM PST by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I don’t get it.

In the article , Meisner says that a variance of 2-3% doesn’t make a difference. Then he goes on in the next paragraph to say that very small variances do make a difference.

In either case, their ‘proof’ consists of computer models.

How is a model considered ‘proof’ ?


6 posted on 01/16/2015 11:35:49 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

ok, this is going to be good.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Self-Aware-Universe-Amit-Goswami/dp/0874777984

“The Self-Aware Universe.”

He proposes that there is something that has to and must be an overarching entity that controls all the collapse and all the entanglements, such that we all see and experience the same things.

From a Christian perspective, I say, ya, obviously. But it is really interesting to see physics coming to a similar point.

As in all physics, they are studying Gods principles and His creation, yet most people don’t want to admit it. Especially when their studies point back to Him.


7 posted on 01/16/2015 11:43:18 AM PST by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thepoodlebites
Agreed. It amazes how pigheaded some scientists can be when they speak of the 'big bang'.

Was it Hubble that coined that phrase some 50 years ago? Yet the account of Genesis was written a LOT longer ago than that.

Lemme see...all energy and matter that ever was and ever will be compressed into a single point, infinitely dense...'explodes' in a blinding flash of light and energy.
Now where have I read something like that before....hmmm. Got it. Four words...a mere thought from the Creator...."Let there be light!"

Why do they think that the big bang and Genesis are so irreconcilable? I can understand the quest for a possible underlying mechanism. But to deny a greater purpose, a greater Mind behind it? Seems odd.

8 posted on 01/16/2015 12:04:59 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Life and death are but temporary states. But Freedom endures forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Computer models are incredibly powerful.

For instance, mere thermometers show that the Earth has been cooling for 18 years and 4 months. But computer models have proven that the Earth is getting warmer.


9 posted on 01/16/2015 12:11:35 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

You ask, “How is a computer model considered proof?” the

Well, that’s all that the global warmists have. They don’t have real “proof”!


10 posted on 01/16/2015 12:19:37 PM PST by PawPaw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I watched a show the other night about the Large Hadron Collider and the Higgs Boson. Here’s what I took away.

Bigger stuff is made of smaller stuff, and you’d be surprised how small some stuff is.


11 posted on 01/16/2015 12:20:19 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...

· String Theory Ping List ·
Sorry we re open
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


12 posted on 01/16/2015 2:38:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...

· String Theory Ping List ·
Sorry we re open
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


13 posted on 01/16/2015 2:38:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: afsnco

If I get to go before Him, I’d ask first, “Why viruses?”

‘Nasty host-seeking, host-needing, mutant varmints.

Talk about aliens....


14 posted on 01/16/2015 10:11:01 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

No God, Only One Universe (Not Possible)
God, Only One Universe (Possible)
No God, Multiverse (Possible)
God, Multiverse (Possible)

If No God, then must be a Multiverse.


15 posted on 01/17/2015 5:10:13 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
If I get to go before Him, I’d ask first, “Why viruses?”

Just an idea.

1)God is the all-wise, all powerful, all-loving Creator.

2)God finished Creation and saw that it was Good.

3)Satan/Lucifer is the most powerful created being and a "wannabe" god.

4) Satan's attempts at creating life ("Hey, it's just a bunch of chemicals in random combinations over Time! How hard can it be?") and he comes up with Viruses.

"A virus is a small infectious agent that replicates only inside the living cells of other organisms."

"The origins of viruses in the evolutionary history of life are unclear..."

"Viruses are considered by some to be a life form, because they carry genetic material, reproduce, and evolve through natural selection. However they lack key characteristics (such as cell structure) that are generally considered necessary to count as life. Because they possess some but not all such qualities, viruses have been described as "organisms at the edge of life".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus

1 Peter 5:8 English Standard Version (ESV)

8 Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.

John 10:10 English Standard Version (ESV)

10 The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I (Jesus)came that they may have life and have it abundantly.

BTW, If I get to go before Him,..., one way or another, you will get that opportunity.

Plan ahead! :-)

16 posted on 01/17/2015 5:31:24 AM PST by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Darwin's Black Box
Darwin's Black Box:
The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution

by Michael J. Behe
hardcover

Molecular Machines webpage
(thanks Val)

17 posted on 01/17/2015 5:32:34 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Yeah — but they’re reaching toward AI...


18 posted on 01/18/2015 7:51:57 PM PST by GOPJ (Radical Muslims are the 'brutish light-fearing Morlocks' of the Islamic political machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson