<p>When House Republicans found out the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was spending taxpayer dollars on sex research projects — including a $147,000 grant for a Northwestern University study that paid women to watch pornography — they started asking questions. In July, the House narrowly rejected a bill offered by Rep. Patrick J. Toomey, Pennsylvania Republican, that would have eliminated funding for some of the NIH sex projects. Now, it seems, the sex researchers are fighting back. An attorney for the American Psychological Association (APA) has sent out an e-mail "action alert," urging APA members to write or phone their congressmen "about the important public-health implications of your research." Karen Studwell, legislative and federal affairs officer in the APA's Washington office, offered several "talking points" for the psychologists, including: "Sexual behavior is a legitimate subject for scientific research. Diminished research in this area will lead to fewer interventions for promoting sexual health and responsible sexual behaviors. The public-health consequences could be severe. ... "Taxpayers can take comfort in the rigorous scientific merit review process in place at NIH." •John McCaslin, a nationally syndicated columnist, can be reached at 202/636-3284 or jmccaslin@washingtontimes.com.</p>