Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $65,985
81%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 81%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: nofairtrial

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Big question: What criminal charges might Jack Smith bring against Trump related to January 6?

    07/19/2023 2:58:42 PM PDT · by Macho MAGA Man · 42 replies
    Julie Kelly on Twitter ^ | July 19, 2023 | Julie Kelly
    Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 @julie_kelly2 Big question: What criminal charges might Jack Smith bring against Trump related to January 6? As I've explained in interviews and columns for over a year, DOJs looming indictment against Trump for January 6 poses tremendous legal jeopardy to the former president. Why? Because DOJs 2 1/2 year-record of success in prosecuting more than 1,000 individuals for even minimal participation in Jan 6 has established new legal precedents that apply to anyone involved in the Capitol protest. This will include Trump and his co-defendants. January 6 Jurisprudence It's important to emphasize how DOJ--DC US Attorney's office...
  • Tapes of Libby testimony to be released (Grand Jury Testimony)

    02/05/2007 8:43:48 AM PST · by shrinkermd · 9 replies · 631+ views
    Associated Press ^ | 5 February 2007 25 minutes ago | PETE YOST
    Audio recordings of former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's secret grand jury testimony will be released publicly after they are presented at his trial, the judge at Libby's trial ruled Monday. In a victory for the news media, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton said he had little choice but to make them public under the law as applied in the federal court system in Washington, D.C, even though he has concerns about releasing the recordings while the case is under way. Libby is charged with perjury, obstruction and lying to the FBI in an indictment that focuses in...
  • Judge in Dover case still fighting

    06/05/2006 4:53:41 PM PDT · by PatrickHenry · 287 replies · 2,827+ views
    Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | 05 June 2006 | Amy Worden
    John E. Jones III is using the intelligent-design debate to answer his critics and talk about judicial independence. U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III could have taken the safe route and retreated to the privacy of the courthouse after issuing his landmark ruling in December against intelligent design. Most judges are loath to go public about their cases at all, let alone respond to their critics. But Jones - angered by accusations that he had betrayed the conservative cause with his ruling, and disturbed by the growing number of politically motivated attacks on judges in general - came out...