Posted on 12/27/2025 7:06:47 AM PST by grundle
The state’s parole board has released 39 “emerging adult” murder convicts who were originally sentenced to life without parole, but who later became eligible after a court ruling.
The Massachusetts Parole Board has issued 51 parole decisions since the Supreme Judicial Court last year ruled that emerging adults who were 18 to 20 at the time of the offense cannot be sentenced to life without parole.
Allen Alston, 47 — formerly known as Allen Scoggins — was one of the convicted murderers granted parole. On May 16, 1997, a then-19-year-old Alston shot and killed taxi driver Ismael Rivera, 56, in Brockton.
Alston was seen entering Rivera’s vehicle and ultimately shot Rivera before fleeing on foot. Alston was arrested in South Carolina about five months after the fatal shooting and confessed to killing Rivera.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
Its OK if they stay in Massachusetts, perhaps Martha’s Vineyard, Nantucket or Cambridge. The problem is there will be no strings attached to their mobility and they can carry their criminal pasts into Red states.
Liberals are out of control in Ma. and voters ignore them.
It should be required that the parolees live with members of the parole board for 6 months.
Well once again..... F’ the decent citizens!
Some will kill again. By rights, their victims should be members of the Massachusetts Parole Board or their relatives because there will be victims.
Similar to CDLs issued to the unqualified.
They worry more about murders and thieves than they do taxpaying citizens
MassOf2Shits
They are unemployable in the business world, so expect them to become government employees. Maybe Code Enforcement or running for public office.
By rights, their victims should be members of the Massachusetts Parole Board
Instead of the murders and thieves they released earlier
These parole board members have no respect or sympathy for the family members and victims of the murderers.
These acts of irresponsibility always end up with this question: “Why did mobs of citizens take to the streets and hang or decapitate those in charge?”
When those in charge oppress the law-abiding and refuse to imprison the worst criminals, they DESERVE to be hanged from lamp posts. They earned their violent punishments.
Massholes
My family moved out of Messoftwoshits when I was ten. We moved to Arizona. God blessed us. My first cousin was murdered by a corrupt cop in his own house while having a nervous breakdown. My aunt and her granddaughter ended up receiving some big bucks with the lawsuit but my cousin died very young from six bullets from a crooked cop’s gun. In Mass, it’s not just negroes that are killed by the cops.
Won’t be long before we read about vicious crimes committed by these convicts.
When they reoffend, and chances are they will, each “justice” on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court who voted in favor of this should be tried alongside the criminal and face the same punishment.
GROK3 says>>>
-
-
-
-
Yes, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruling was a split decision.The landmark case, Commonwealth v. Mattis (decided January 11, 2024), ruled that sentencing “emerging adults” (ages 18–20 at the time of the offense) to life without parole is unconstitutional under the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, as it constitutes cruel or unusual punishment.
This made Massachusetts the first state to categorically ban such sentences for this age group.
The decision was 4–3:Majority (4 justices):
Chief JustASS Kimberly S. Budd (DEI female and black) (author), joined by JustASSES Scott L. Kafker, Dalila Argaez Wendlandt, and Frank M. Gaziano.
They emphasized neuroscience showing that emerging adults’ brains are not fully mature (similar to juveniles), their diminished culpability, greater potential for rehabilitation, and evolving standards of decency.
Dissent (3 justices):
Justices David A. Lowy and Elspeth B. Cypher (separate dissents), with some overlap in concerns. They argued that the judiciary should defer to the Legislature on defining adulthood and punishment severity, rather than extending juvenile protections based on brain science.
I wonder how diverse the parolees were? Were whites and females adequately represented?
It’s MA so it is important to them.
Years ago, I listened to a politician address this issue. She condescendingly said something along the lines of, “Crime is a lifestyle choice like any other and we have to respect that.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.