Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $36,544
45%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 45%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: losttreaty

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • No Time to Get LOST

    12/21/2012 9:28:04 AM PST · by Kaslin · 5 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | December 21, 2012 | Ed Feulner
    “It is an outrage.” The source of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s anger? The fact that the United States has yet to approve a treaty known as the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, which often goes by the acronym LOST. Panetta was speaking after the election. His ire about LOST’s status suggests that the Obama administration may well make this a second-term priority. It’s come close to being ratified by the U.S. Senate before -- it dates back to 1982, in fact. But LOST has never been able to gain enough supporters in the Senate. That could change,...
  • Sea Treaty all but dead, 34 GOP senators oppose

    07/16/2012 1:14:46 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 103 replies
    SFGate.com ^ | 7/16/12 | Donna Cassata - ap
    WASHINGTON (AP) — A treaty governing the high seas is all but dead in the Senate as two Republican senators announced their opposition Monday, giving conservative foes the necessary votes to scuttle the pact. Sens. Rob Portman of Ohio and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire — both mentioned as possible running mates for likely Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney — said they had serious concerns about the breadth and ambiguity of the Law of the Sea treaty and would oppose it if called up for a vote. The Constitution requires two-thirds of the Senate — 67 votes — to ratify...
  • Water Woes: We must stop this looney leftist plan to give UN control of our water

    07/12/2012 8:59:10 AM PDT · by Oldpuppymax · 3 replies
    Coach is Right ^ | 7/12/2012 | Suzanne Eovaldi
    Is Obama’s federal government getting ready to put a huge red X mark on the Hoover Dam which supplies most of the American West with its life sustaining water? Having this scenario play out is quite plausible as Barack Obama’s Executive Order # 13547 in support of the global Law of the Sea Treaty (L.O.S.T.) seeks to take control of our water and any form of precipitation from sky to ocean! Total water control will give the American president and his global cohorts total control of all U.S. citizens if this initiative is not stopped by still free citizens. Because...
  • Tide turns against Law of the Sea Treaty

    07/11/2012 4:28:09 PM PDT · by SMGFan · 27 replies
    The Hill ^ | July 11, 2012 | By Julian Pecquet
    The Obama administration's all-out push to join the United Nations international maritime treaty is just four votes short of being doomed after two more senators this week added their names to the list of lawmakers who have vowed to oppose it. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) are the two latest senators to sign on to the letter, The Hill has learned, bringing the total to 30. Treaties need a two-thirds majority to pass in the Senate, meaning 34 signatures would effectively kill it.
  • Obama Places U.S. Under UN's LOST Treaty with Executive Order for "National Council Of Oceans"

    07/30/2010 8:47:20 PM PDT · by NorwegianViking · 145 replies · 2+ views
    Information Liberation ^ | July 30, 2010 | Cassandra Anderson
    Thirty states will be encroached upon by Obama's Executive Order establishing the National Ocean Council for control over America's oceans, coastlines and the Great Lakes. Under this new council, states' coastal jurisdictions will be subject to the United Nations' Law Of Sea Treaty (LOST) in this UN Agenda 21 program. America'a oceans and coastlines will be broken into 9 regions that include the North East, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, the Gulf Coast, West Coast, the Great Lakes, Alaska, the Pacific Islands (including Hawaii) and the Caribbean.... Because of the decades of difficulty that the collectivists have had trying to ratify the...
  • US SENATE MOVES ON UNCLOS RATIFICATION (Alert!)

    11/02/2007 12:50:45 PM PDT · by Baladas · 23 replies · 45+ views
    Maritime Global Net ^ | 02 November 2007 | staff
    THE US Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved the UN Law of Sea Convention , sending it to the full Senate for ratification. A statement issued by Foreign Relations Committee Republican leader Dick Lugar said he encouraged Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to schedule floor consideration as quickly as possible. Senator Lugar told the committee: “The United States faces intensifying national security and economic costs if we continue to absent ourselves from the Law of the Sea. If we fail to ratify this treaty, we are allowing decisions that will affect our Navy, our ship operators, our off-shore industries, and other...
  • Possibly the Final Push for the Law of the Sea Treaty

    10/30/2007 3:11:41 PM PDT · by Baladas · 17 replies · 103+ views
    Townhall.com ^ | October 30, 2007 | Paul Weyrich
    The Law of the Sea Treaty (“LOST” to opponents, “UNCLOS” to supporters) is up for a vote in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this Thursday, November 1. The State Department pushed this treaty in 1981 when Ronald Reagan was President. He rejected it, primarily because of Part XI of the Treaty, which regulates minerals on the seabed outside any sovereign state's territorial waters. It establishes an International Seabed Authority (ISA) to authorize seabed exploration and mining and collect and distribute the seabed mining royalty. President Reagan strongly objected to the provisions of Part XI, saying that they were unfavorable to...
  • L.O.S.T. Treaty (anti!) Resolution from the Oregon Republican Party

    10/10/2007 8:24:52 PM PDT · by jeffgr1776 · 30 replies · 661+ views
    Remember the amnesty issue? The ORP speaks out again... Resolution of the Oregon Republican Party Concerning the Law of the Sea Treaty (L.O.S.T.) Whereas the Bush administration, for the second time in three years, is putting on a major effort for Senate ratification of the United Nations Law of the Sea Treaty; and Whereas President Ronald Reagan refused to sign L.O.S.T. in 1982 because he realized that the treaty doesn't serve United States’ interests; and Whereas in 1994 President Clinton signed a revised version of L.O.S.T. and forwarded it to the Senate, which did not ratify it; and Whereas L.O.S.T....