Free Republic

Wow, Sig was able to make a better pistol than Beretta designed in 1972...... they should really pat themselves on the back....

Well, I would submit that selling other fine Americans guns, on the day of the rally, it probably the next best thing to being there!

While I readily admit I cannot read the entire, as I am cubicle bound, I simply cannot agree with what I can read (the snippet on FR).

Too long have we not stood up, too long have we worried about the optics of “what could be”. The reason most politicians do what they do is because there is no push back. I do not care if the entire march is awash in Dixie flags and camo. The people need to stand up.

These politicians, that would usurp our rights, need to be put on notice. Shying away from this, and hoping that some court someday may overturn, or that someday the pols will be voted out and the law will become null and void, is the path already traveled, and it has gotten us nowhere.

Stand tall Virginians, we are with you.

“A 17-year-old student at Waukesha South High School was shot Monday after police said he pointed a gun at an officer.”

Well well well, I stand corrected. Cannot believe they left this sentence to the last paragraph. I’m sure we will see MSNBC and others changing that to front page soon.

“According to police, a student was armed with a weapon and confronted a school resource officer.

It’s not clear what type of weapon the student had.”

Many assuming gun, but in this day and age, had the student had a gun, I assume it would be leading every story. Fits the narrative far too well for the media not to jump on it.

This whole movement (from both sides of the aisle) is working towards nullifying the natural born citizen clause. We should resist this with everything we have. One of the greatest protections the founders left us with is the natural born clause.

“But aren’t the people of God supposed to be different from the nations around them?”

I suppose that is a question best asked of the nations around them.

Justified or not? Guess it depends on what side you are on, kind of like every other conquest in mankind’s history.

My point is this, the Israelites were invading, conquest for land. No different than many before and after them. Use God’s commands as your reason? Ghengis Khan rampaged around for the same reason.

All of this does not change the fact, that in order to conquer land, you need to deal with those that would oppose you. Much of the time, this includes killing everyone and everything. Some may call that genocide, others will call it sound military strategy.

Myself? I am in the latter camp. No good military leader has ever left the enemy, unguarded and unopposed, to their rear. Well no successful military leader anyway.

The books covering the Israelite conquest of the holy land, and the books preparing them for it, read like a military conquest, because that is what it was. No different than any other in history imho.

The old testament is filled with genocide after genocide after genocide. But what people seem to forget, is that this is the way conquest was done.

As a military, you simply cannot leave anyone behind you who may be trouble. The best way to deal with that, was to leave no one behind you. This was not new at the time, history is full of such things.

But to say that God did not order the absolute killing of everyone, i.e. every man, woman, child, and beast, is simply not true. It is spelled out very clearly, and was carried out per very specific orders, for very good military reasons.

So true mo, so very true. The democrats have perfected voter fraud, heck look how many posters right here on this thread they have fooled.

Reminds me of some areas during Obamas election. He won many areas with upwards of 114% of the vote.......and all people said was, yea he did real well in those areas?!

The idea that the mere presence of a gun, allows a police officer to be justified in a shooting, simply cannot coexist with a nation who’s citizens right to be armed is God given.

Agree 100%

“Police said in the statement that the officer, who joined the department in April 2018, saw a person standing inside the home near a window.

“Perceiving a threat, the officer drew his duty weapon and fired one shot striking the person inside the residence,” the statement said.“

I am seriously beginning to wonder if there is anything police officers do not perceive as a threat.

Bookmark

If it was a mistake and you weren’t going in there trying to kill someone, you’d probably get 10 years, too, or maybe less or possibly nothing.

**********

I am sorry, but I do not believe that.

I also believe the mistake excuse is as thin as can be. (wrong floor, wrong apartment, bright red door mat indicating wrong apartment, no notice of wrong apartment once door was open even though all décor is obviously different, man sitting eating ice cream seen as a threat, ect, ect, ect)

You or I throw that defense up in court, and our fate is sealed (as it should be for our “mistake”)

Chupacabra!

If any of us, walked into someone’s apartment and shot them, would our sentence be 10 years?

I think not....

All are equal, only some are more equal than others.

Sure does!

WHO CHANGED THE LONG STANDING WHISTLEBLOWER RULES JUST BEFORE SUBMITTAL OF THE FAKE WHISTLEBLOWER REPORT? DRAIN THE SWAMP!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 30, 2019

This is what no one seems to be talking about and is the end to the impeachment if understood. Word of mouth is all the evidence you need to be a whistleblower and you are protected?! There was a reason that heresay was never allowed before the change.....

The changing of the rules is the smoking gun to this whole nonsense. Why no conservative talk show hosts are banging this drum is concerning.

Not a natural born citizen