Wrong. The only difference is, having put forward the slate of alternate electors, they were accepted. But prior to that, the electors accepted were in EXACTLY the same position as these electors.
Calling this a crime is just more left wing lawfare.
I have questions about exactly what the process is.
Typically, a jury is provided a written questionnaire in advance of coming to Court. The answers they provide are made available to counsel. I understand something like this happened in this case?
First question: Who determined the questions that were to be asked in the questionnaire? Judge Merchan? Or did counsel have input?
Then, there is a certain amount of questioning permitted of the jurors by counsel after they have made it into court (voir dire). Who is doing the questioning? Judge Merchan, or the counsel? How much time is counsel permitted to spend questionning a juror? Has Judge Merchan prevented or forbidden counsel from asking certain questions?
Finally, how many peremptory challenges is each side allowed to exercise?
Everyone considering a mouthguard should get/borrow the little device (it clips on to the end of a finger) that measures the oxygen level in your blood. As long as it stays over 95% the whole night, then a mouthguard is fine. If not. . . .
Even if this is initially permitted, it will last only until the first time Trump complains about something that occurred during a sidebar on social media. Then the judge will ban him.