Of course it’s bigotry. It may be a fact that he’s a homosexual, but your comment is still bigoted. Your silly statement of “The days of blood and iron are about to start.” is such hyperbole.
Your argument presupposes a failure of Drudge’s reasoning for his website articles because of his sin (according to your opinion). Isn’t your argument’s basis based upon feelings you have? Shouldn’t, we, as conservatives base our disagreements on fact and reason? Haven’t we all sinned? I think we should address each others thoughts/opinions with accompanying reason and respect. I’m not saying I agree with the direction The Drudge site appears to be drifting. I’m saying that we should oppose our peers opinions without the bigotry your comment displayed.
Why is it necessary to refer to some article from Drudge as from that “faggot”? I think your comment detracts from the conversation. How about you just let your disagreement stand on its own without the disparaging reference to Drudge?
I don’t agree with this young man. But good gosh, can’t you focus on his statements? What he looks like is irrelevant. How old he is is irrelevant. I am astounded at your immaturity. What a pathetic comment.
This type of comment is part of why I don’t contribute to FR. The “Laz would hit it” comments are juvenile as well. Puerile comments such as yours demean all of us. IMHO she was not a successful NASCAR driver. At times she attempted to capitalize on her femininity/sexuality. She’ll move on. As will we. I never thought I’d say this to someone but you’re comments are piggish and add nothing to a ‘good’ conversation.
I agree with you. Ms. Coulter talks a courageous game from television studios and behind the pages of her books. No leader is she. Perhaps Ms. Coulter should look to Ayaan Hirsi Ali for encouragement.