Free Republic

Usually correct when the bidding closes.

This is all so intriguing. No matter what side you’re on, this is great theater. I can’t believe the MSM doesn’t pick it up for the sheer intrigue. It’s so much more complex and interesting than re-hashing all the Michael Jackson stuff.

Anyway, great thread. I hope this breaks wide open.

Exactly. I found it odd that SCOTUSBLOG didn’t mention this case at ANY time, even when they discussed the Court’s schedule for the day. I’m sure they had an uptick in traffic too, and I’m sure they knew why.

I think a lot of people fear that if they even speak of this issue they’ll be labeled as a loon. Never mind the fact that the Supreme Court discussed it today.

Oh Lord....

What has happened to that once great country? Why do they want to continue to relinquish their tradition?

The children better get used to clitorectomies.

For the poll to be valid, the question needs to be asked only near the time when the dcision would normally be made.

I keep trying to picture what would happen if this was occurring in the US. How would authorities and police act? How would the populace behave?

Scary to envision...

I wonder why SCOTUSblog doesn’t have any mention of the scheduled conference. At least I can’t find one.

So far nothing has changed from 2004.

I live in NH.

So it’s even sadder for me to see this state go down the sh*tter.

Sorry, but I need some more hard data.

Where are the “leaked” exit polls?

There’s *no way* the liberal media is showing restraint after getting burned in 2004. Inaccuracy has never stopped them from reporting before.

They must be seeing numbers that won’t benefit Obama.

I voted earlier today in a fairly liberal NH city.

Good news: 1)Was not as busy as I anticipated. 2)There were a bunch of Obama supporters waving at cars on the town green, but very few people were honking back.

Bad news: I saw more same-day registrants than usual, and they looked like hippies.

One reason the pollsters may feel less pressure to “get it right” on election day this year is that if they’re way off, they don’t have to be accountable this time. They can just blame us, the voters, for misleading them due to racism.

He’s changing his definition of “wealthy” to “$265,000/year and white collar”.

So have we determined why the “Guaranteed Winner” is spending all this time in Hawaii?

Just curious. And I’m not naive enough to believe it has anything to do with his grandmother...

Has anyone asked if the "B" might stand for Barr?

/I keed, I keed

Unfortunately, a taste of what might come if Obama loses.

I'm glad I don't live near a big city, and I have a CCW.

Is this actually on TV, or just on the website?

Thanks for the replies.

LGF doesn’t mean that much to me. And if I felt the need to post, I have other usernames (he.. he..). But as I’ve said, my posts tend to be tame.

I know he has every right to do what he did. I just feel it’s a terrible style for a webmaster to squelch even tame dissension.

I recently got on board at Lucianne. Now THAT’s a place I value. I’ll be very polite.

My linked post shows the comment that got me in trouble. A thinly veiled complaint? Fine. A bannable offense? I didn't think so.

I agree that Johnson can do whatever he likes with his own site. But stifling such mild criticism reeks of KOS-like censorship. (I was once also banned from KOS for agreeing with Bush about something). Anyone is free to search the past LGF comments of "Mazeman" to see that I wasn't a rabble-rouser.

Personally I feel some dissent stimulates intelligent discourse. In this instance, Johnson didn't allow either. But again, that's his right.