You know what is amusing about the "conspiracy buffs?" They never stop to think how ridiculous some things they say are. While some of them ask good questions, most of them simply change the subject to other things.
For example:
if the CIA was going to do this, don't you think they'd have had enough sense to have the Zapruder film blocked or to say, "No cameras?" Jeez, that's ridiculous.
As far as some other things:
1) Those who spout about the "magic bullet" have never done their homework. The WC did not say this is the linchpin of the entire thing. They talked about probabilities. You really need to read it before you say this stuff.
2) David Lifton concocted a "stolen body theory" way back in the 70s that Wecht dismissed as "crap," so I wouldn't put much stock in him. He also came out with the "fake trees" theory, which only goes to show that you CAN fool some of the people ALL of the time.
3) Quote: "The most reliable evidence is CE-399. No bullet ever smashed a bunch of bones and ended up looking like that one."
You've been reading too many Jim Garrison note cards. The bullet DIDN'T hit a bunch of bones from close range. It hit MUSCLE and tore through it, sir.
The final question, of course, is this:
Since all physical evidence that points to anyone points to Oswald, please give me - by name - the person who the other evidence points to. If your theory is correct, it shouldn't be that difficult.