Free Republic

Glory to God!! Thank You.

“Get that investigation away from the leftist corrupt faggot loving FBI.”

This is from the FBI’s website:

If a crime is committed that is a violation of local, state, and federal laws, does the FBI “take over” the investigation?

No. State and local law enforcement agencies are not subordinate to the FBI, and the FBI does not supervise or take over their investigations.

This is from the U. S. Marshals’ website:

The U.S. Marshals Service assumes custody of individuals arrested by all federal agencies and is responsible for the housing and transportation of prisoners from the time they are brought into federal custody until they are either acquitted or incarcerated.

The U.S. Marshals Service houses over 63,000 prisoners in federal, state, local and private jails throughout the nation. In order to house these pre-sentenced prisoners, the U.S. Marshals Service contracts with approximately 1,200 state and local governments to rent jail space. Seventy-five percent of the prisoners in U.S. Marshals custody are detained in state, local and private facilities; the remainder are housed in Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) facilities.

DeSantis CAN take this, and Routh is in a rented jail space at the moment.

He precisely said 8 cartridges.

The timestamp of the guy who counted 5 is 6:27; the timestamp of the guy who counted 8 is 7:09.

That’s funny! Was he confusing FULRO with some obscure national front socialist insurgency? Is there a video?

You’ve been posting for almost 24 hours straight. How do you do that!?

I see in the addition to your profile from a few moments ago that today, June 5th, is the very anniversary of your exodus from New Orleans.

“Sadly, today (5 June 2009) Because of Katrina, I sadly changed my state from Louisiana to Texas...”

You speak of yourself in the third person.

Katrina was 18 years ago, and Texas is not a blue state.

Are the grandparents involved? Your mother would be a second female voice in the courtroom.

“Running against Joe Biden, Donald J. Trump lost the people who had voted against Hillary.”

Baloney. Trump got 11 million MORE votes in 2020 than he did in 2016.

Thank you for pointing out the ratio-weighted algorithm. I was confirming the PRECISE accuracy of the forensics report; I should not have just written “switched” as this word is imprecise. I apologize if I (unintentionally) misled anyone.

I presume you want to get into the arithmetic weeds. As can be seen at J2 in the first bullet point, the REPORT total error rate is limited by Michigan’s enjoined mandate of federal guidance at 1/125,000 = .0008%, which AMOUNTS TO 1/250,000 ballots being incorrectly reported by a line of tabulating machines that has been proposed for purchase and use. Those evaluating the equipment are only interested in the machine’s report total, not why the machine reports wrongly.

The initial numbers reported out of Antrim County showed our President at 4,509 votes with 98% of precincts reporting. The final numbers reported by Antrim after correction gave 9,783 votes to President Trump. This is a difference of 5,274 votes. 100% of the precincts revealed an even larger difference of 5,333 votes.

15,972 votes were cast in Antrim for President including third party and write-in. The forensics report discounts the write-ins and prefers 15,949 Presidential votes for consideration. The tabulators account for 15,676 votes; 296 votes were recorded that the tabulators did not read. We are concerned with the 15,676 votes handled by the tabulators.

10,667 ballots suffered alteration within the machines before bogus whole integer numbers were spit out. Some machines performed ratios leading to a greater than 80% error rate while others were closer to 55%. The aggregate for the entire lot of cheating machines as recorded by the server was 68.04699585...%. 10,667 altered ballots out of 15,676 ballots handled by the tabulators is whence the ~68% figure derives.

5,333 were weighted light for Trump while 5,334 were weighted heavy for Biden, with different weightings on different tabulators. These various weightings affecting 10,667 ballots (5,333 + 5,334) HAVE THE SAME EFFECT as switching 5,333.5 ballots, which number (5333.5/10,667) is ~34.025%.

The shrewd evil of internal fractional apportionment is that it usually escapes audit. The number of ballots equals the server-reported total. Even more devious is coding the harmed ballots as in need of adjudication and then approving them to the nearest whole number. More devious yet is buying time to manufacture ballots for defeating a hand count.

Again, I apologize for MY imprecision. The precision of the forensics report is untouchable. There were many posts belittling the forensics report, and even belittling Ramsland, although Ramsland is just the CEO; his technical people did a great job. Freegards.

THERE IS NO ERROR
John and Mary are running for class president. There are 100 students in the class. When the ballots are first counted, there appears to be a tie: 50 ballots for John and 50 ballots for Mary.

Just to be sure, the ballots are counted again. It is discovered that one ballot that was counted for John should have been counted for Mary. Hence, Mary wins 51 to 49.

Only one ballot out of one hundred (1% of the ballots) was counted wrongly, but the error rate is 2%: 51/100 (51%) to 49/100 (49%).

An error rate of 68.05% means that 34.025% of the ballots were switched.

Actually, I became aware of this typo because of Twitter trolls making snarky remarks to our VSGPOTUS, not because of you. I do not have and do not want a Twitter account.

It’s just a typo. As anyone can see, the red portion of the bar is nowhere near a third of the way to the 50k line on the right, which would correspond to a difference between the total vote and the (fraudulent) Biden vote of approximately 15,000; the red portion is about a tenth of the way to the 50k line, which corresponds to a difference of approximately 5,000.
Likewise, anyone can see that the top of the bar is not virtually even with the 150k line, which would be the case if the total were 149,772. Rather, the height of the bar relative to the 100k line is about one tenth below the 150k line, which corresponds to 139,772.
THE MATH IS CORRECT, and the analytic conclusion of fraud STANDS! 134,886 ÷ 139,772 is approximately 96.5%. The convention in mathematics is that when a result falls on a half, you round to the even number. The percentage is ever so slightly above 96.5, and thence is technically closer to 97%, but the precision is less than 1/100 of a percent and does not justify treating the half percent as devoid when the intent is to express a rounded whole percentage.
It is a simple and common matter to amend an affidavit because of a typo, but the amendment must certainly be made from an incorrect total of 149,772 to the correct total of 139,772 so as to preclude snarky comments about basic math from some supercilious troll who doesn’t know how to read a simple graph.
Could someone with genuine access to the Powell sub-team alert them to the typo so that they can amend the affidavit?
Love y’all.

Why would Trump retweet a video of foul-mouthed protests against himself? This seems to be sabotage from within the campaign. Katie?

NSA - D - DAG: Flynn cuts. Other countries
D - DAG: lean forward on unclass
VP: “Logan Act”
P: These are unusual times
VP: I’ve been [doi X] on the intel comittee (sic) for ten years
and I never
P: Make sure you lode (sic) alr thing - + have the right people on it
P: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling transition
team?
D: Flynn [arrow] Kislyak calls but appear legit
AppLisa (??) - Happy New Year. Yeah right

alr = American Law Reports
Flynn cuts = summaries NOT transcripts of multiple calls, but note well that NSA (Rogers) and “Other countries” had the raw recordings and, of course, their own cuts (summaries). The NSA source was left by Grenell for Ratcliffe to make an actual transcript. The key Kislyak TO Flynn call was when Flynn was in the Dominican Republic. Kislyak called Flynn! — when Flynn happened to be out of the country and subject to Five Eyes.
doi X = Strzok started to write “doing” but scribbled it out.
...not sure about the “App” word on final line.

“Threatening to sue is doing nothing.”
JW has to wait 90 days from notice of violation on Jan. 2. JW NEVER fails to follow through with suit.

“Do you think JW would try to clean up Republican counties, even if they found discrepancies? Just curious.”
JW is bringing suit against Chester Co., PA, where R OUTNUMBERS D 43% to 38%. This county is actually one of the 19. Out of the 378, we can should expect the same 1/19 proportion or less.

The book “Racial Matters” contains the FBI files on King. Your analysis is spot on concerning communist compromise, while noting that Kng was personally put off by Maoists and, like the New Left, by the word “communism.” King was in fact a Republican as was John Lennon. Nonetheless, all leftists advance the ball in the wrong direction in their compromise of soul, knowing their immoral choices.