Free Republic

Kellyanne is just another establishment Republican who wants to go back to zombie Reaganism. We tried it for decades. It doesn’t work. No one wants to hear about tax cuts and deregulation when this country is going to hell in a handbasket. Trump needs to warn people about what the rats are going to do to the country.

“What happens if someone flies the lgbgtxxx flag upside down?”

What happens if someone burns the rainbow flag? Would the ACLU defend that in court? I bet not.

I don’t understand why anyone would post her reaction at all. No one, including the libs, pays attention to her anymore.

“What is most unusual is someone who is supposed to be concerned about Abortion, accepting the most ridiculous codswallop spewed out by the most anti-pro-life people you will ever find.”

This is so absurdly stupid that it makes no sense whatsoever. Saying that Trump should compromise on 2020 rather than taking any kind of pro-life stand is absolutely pro-life. Most people do not care about 2020 at all. And the vast majority think Biden won fairly. It’s fine if you disagree with them. But this is not a good issue for Trump. If you support him, you will focus on Biden’s corruption and inflation.

Anyone can read the press release from Salem that they retracted the film. Don’t be willfully ignorant.

https://investor.salemmedia.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/847/salem-media-statement

Just because you don’t like a source does not mean it is incorrect. I’m guessing you’re one of those Jim Hoft lovers.

“You don’t get 15 million more votes by population increases. You get them only through fraud.”

Again, you think your personal opinions and inferences are facts. They are not. Only 55% of eligible voters cast a ballot in 2016. That means there were tens of millions of people who could have voted but did not. They were heavily mobilized by both of the parties in 2020. The anti-Trumpers came out in full force to eject him. The pro-Trumpers came out in force to support him. This is easy to understand. Just because you *feel extra hard* that something is true does not make it true.

“So the *LIARS* tell us, but Trump got the highest *REAL VOTE* total in American history. The News liars fabricated the propaganda that he is hated, but the actual vote numbers proved he was the most popular incumbent president EVER!”

This means nothing. Trump was also the most hated incumbent president EVER. End of your talking point.

“People really do hate Biden. News Liars and celebrity propaganda mouths hate Trump. Real people don’t hate Trump.”

What statistics do you have to prove this point?

“’Your feeling about the total number of ballots cast is also not proof of anything.’

“It is absolute proof that Biden is illegitimate.”

You just wrote that your feelings are “absolute proof.” This is Russiagate thinking.

Look, I don’t care if you want to believe 2020 was stolen. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Most people do not share your viewpoint. This is not a winning issue for Trump. It’s time for him to put it by the wayside and focus on Biden’s presidency rather than the past.

You seem not to realize that under the law, D’Souza’s production company had the right to the chain of custody records for the ballots of Andrews’ family members. Do you seriously believe they had that information and it affirmed D’Souza’s story but they declined to state that at all to the public or in court? This is information that was easy to look up. It’s not secret. And they had the right to it.

“Most baby murder is done via pills.

Pill control has a 115-year history of failure. Ask any junkie.”

That may be true, but nonetheless, drugs are still illegal and in pro-life states, so are abortion pills. Both are as they should be.

“Student loan voter bribery was a greater factor than election fraud.”

This is almost certainly true. Democrats are constantly offering free stuff to people and too many Republicans pretend it has no effect. It’s extremely effective. Trump has at least realized this with Social Security. I’m glad he threw away the obsession with privatizing it that Dubya, Mittens, and Paul Ryan had.

‘You can find out many liars *CLAIM* they “debunked” it, but they are all likely his political enemies, and so nothing they say can be accepted at face value.’

Neither you nor Dinesh has ever responded to them point-by-point, as they did to him.

If you cannot debunk the debunkers, then their points stand. They made mincemeat of his statements. If you doubt that, you need to review their criticisms and refute them before your opinions about the critiques could be considered worth anything.

Where are the debunkings of the debunkings? Show me those. They do not exist.

When boxes are first processed, they are put into a sorting machine which notes the date and time that it began and completed plus the location the ballots were received. Each step of the ballot process is put onto the internet so that voters can see where their ballot is at any given step of the process. The ballots of the individuals Andrews claimed to have submitted were not found to have been submitted in a different way from his account. Had they been, you can be assured that Dinesh’s distributor would have used it and publicized it.

“And just ask yourself, does it make any sense that the corrupt, senile, obnoxious old pervert (he showered with his preteen daughter) could get 15 million more votes than the first *BLACK* president and greatest Democrat rock star in history? (Barack Obama)

Do you really think that more people liked Joe Biden than Barack Obama?”

The population of the USA increased since Obama in 2012. There were millions more eligible voters. Additionally, you simply do not have any idea of how hated Trump is. The left wing is obsessed with him. TDS is very very real. Millions of people were not voting for Xiden. They were voting AGAINST Trump. They wanted him out, just as it appears people are feeling now about Xiden. There are tens of millions of people who do not like either party and they just shift depending who they hate more that year.

Your feeling about the total number of ballots cast is also not proof of anything. Your argument is 100% conjecture. It is not evidence.

You cannot refute these 100% true facts:
1) Dinesh said various disputed statements
2) Many people have evaluated those statements and showed that they are false or unproveable
3) Dinesh has not debated with these critics
4) Dinesh’s financiers said the film was going to be pulled for inaccuracies

If Dinesh had real proof, he would have debated the critics. His statements were easily disproven. And he used a Moscow map as if it were from Georgia. This is blatant lying.

No one cited 2000 Mules in their court briefs, because they know it is not a solid piece of work. Only amateurs with no legal background think it’s legit.

You can easily verify that many people debunked 2000 Mules.

https://gprivate.com/5z6s6

He said specific things and they have all been examined. None of the major contested assertions has been proven to be correct.

“Are you serious? It was clearly proof for payment. Normal rational people do not take pictures of themselves dropping ballots into an unguarded collection box. People who need to *PROVE* they did it, do that, but normal people do not.”

Your statement is unsubstantiated conjecture. It would be laughed at in court if it were presented as evidence. You feel this is how people should be behaving, but your opinion really is not relevant. There are many different possible reasons for them to have behaved the way they did. Your sense of propriety is not a valid argument, nor is it evidence.

That is just a list of news articles with a headline summary for each. You need to have a written argument making specific assertions with specific people quoted for it to be legitimate in court. That website is not anything substantive at all. I couldn’t find anything on there about who the authors are.

What polls are you citing for that information? I found one that had only 16% said Biden’s win was definitely not legitimate. 14% said it was probably not legit.

https://polsci.umass.edu/sites/default/files/January2024StateofNationBidenToplines.pdf

“If you cite any of these sites, you automatically lose the argument.”

That’s a logical fallacy. A blind squirrel can find and nut. And Dinesh did not respond to these critics in a detailed fashion as they did to his movie. He refused to name the organizations he claimed were running ballots and he was revealed to have used file footage of Moscow in his video portion of supposed “mules.” The whole thing is a disaster and none of it was substantiated.

If it had been real proof, people would have cited it in court briefs. They did not.

“the Banks who have de-banked Lindell are doing it because of what he has championed about Election Fraud.Bankers, FRiend! No one he has slandered. What ignorance on the topic.”

I thought you were referring to the lawsuits he was facing from the voting companies. I do agree that the banks should not have cut Lindell off since he was not engaging in anything criminal with his statements. This is something I side with him on. It is unjust persecution from banks.