Free Republic

All are term limited, yet we scream for term limits. Apparently, they don’t work.

So why is he in the hospital?

Can’t do any worse than what’s happened to date.

While that is probably the most blatant example, there seems to be in my Catholic friends an underlying “what did I do to deserve God’s rath”.

While that is probably the most blatant example, there seems to be in my Catholic friends an underlying “what did I do to deserve God’s rath”.

Maybe anecdotal, but the “shame” seems most prevalent among my Catholic friends. Some have said it’s God settling a score for earlier sins. Had a friend some 35ish years ago have a child born with severe birth defects. The child died within b.c. a few days. The Catholic paternal grandfather asked them what sin they did to disappoint God.

I don’t get it. This was supposed to be slam dunk easy. So easy a first year jr. lawyer could have prosecuted it without any senior assistance.

Thank you. Now dont drown in the Woolite.

The spread is being caused by largely asymptomatic people. You don’t have to be high risk to get your ass kicked by this.

I seem to remember the desire to be much more draconian when aids was less known about. By some of the same folks who today are griping. Of course it was easier to make it a gay thing.

Duh! If there is a virus like the one going around, then yes, gatherings should be discouraged.

I’ve never quite understood putting hands to our ears and going lalala to drown out the truth. I don’t understand j6st banking in news views that are skewed to an audience over the facts. Not writing that Newsmax become the young Turks in content, but if for example the legal team is muffling it up, then face reality.

Reminds me of the old Karen Lee Bixman Octopus threads.

The amazing thing about religion is you can bend and morph it to anything you want it to be and support it with scripture. I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt until midnight or the cutoff for uploads to be included in the days business.

On that, yes they could. But that is a physical number. Not an extrapolation or something theoretical. But the lower court judge could have made the ruling based on something brought out by the defendants that made the law not legal. Some case law or precedent. Even then, I doubt believe if an upper court rules against the lower court judge there are enough of those to overturn the results.

One expert doing an extrapolation where the constants are unknown. And why wouldn’t they have applied those same flags to the downstate tickets too? They may have lost their chance at controlling the senate. And the house is now in striking distance in 2022. It’s just as easy to write a macro to cover everything as it is just one race.

They made all kinds of claims, but haven’t backed up those claims with evidence. They’ve not presented any of those items in sufficient quantity to change the results when they have presented evidence. You can’t say I have 5 fuzzy postmarks but mathmatically there should be 12,000 so randomly select that quantity of Biden ballots and toss them out. Just doesn’t work that way. They need to have all 12,000 defective ballots. And so far they haven’t produced that.

I totally agree. But if it’s not enough to overturn the vote, it falls far sort of massive. So why use the word? The ballots that are fraudulent need to be investigated. But so many of the claimed fraudulent ballots have been found to be legitimate. I’m not saying it was 100% squeeky clean. It never will be. But to claim massive and you have a handful at best is just as dishonest and disenfranchising.

You ask some good questions. I think they are short on specifics. But I think the bigger plan is to keep people giving money. I get 4 texts a day asking to give just $10 and it will be matched 1000%. (By who, btw.) And I also won a free tee shirt that I can claim for $30.00. Free and $30 just doesn’t add up. I get the same in my email. From the President, the sons, Pence and Ronna McDaniel. Some call me by name. Some call by names other than my name.

I’ve read transcripts and entered documents. They have made claims but have not backed it with evidence that would overturn the results.

While she may sound good, she has to produce the goods with hard evidence and precedence from other cases. They are failing there.