“As you know, the intelligence (agencies) are protected by very, very powerful committees in the Senate and the House,” Kennedy remarked. “And the people who serve on those committees … they’re just safeguarding that (CIA) directorship and I would be very, very dangerous for those committees.”
so ...those committees are supposed to provide OVERSIGHT....not protection...and yes, I get it...what our civics books say is baloney. but I’m just saying that is what they are SUPPOSED to do....
may well be. I wasn’t defending the value proposition. I was merely pointing out the fact that hydrogen is relevant to fertilizer, responding to the point that “hydrogen isn’t fertilizer”
yes, that is precisely the correct analysis....I’ve been thinking that is the method, so I’ll try to dig deep and see what shards of hope I can gather....
serious question for anyone who feels like they can shed light on this...but...for the sake of argument, let’s assume that there are rogue elements within the government who actually orchestrated this.
the question then becomes, how will this be rooted out, how will it be prosecuted, and cleaned up?
the problem as I see it is that ...when the government does the crime, there’s no one left to prosecute the government. or even investigate.
And given the assumption that we started with, of course, not everyone in an implicated agency would be involved obviously. BUT, some on an implicated agency (FBI, SS, CIA) will definitely have missed some warnings and will therefore be highly incentivized to go along with a cover up.
Which just amplifies the original question: how on earth is a government which has done a crime ever exposed?