The Law of Armed conflict has four basic principles:
1. Military Necessity - was there a need for Israel to kill and disrupt the leadership of Hezbollah, which has been indiscriminately firing rockets at Israel every day?
Yes.
2. Distinction - did the weaponized electronic devices target Hezbollah specifically?
Yes - the devices were distributed to Hezbollah fighter BY Hezbollah itself.
3. Avoiding unnecessary suffering - were the devices loaded with enough explosives to incur the minimum damage while achieving the desired effect, i.e., not using massive amounts to obliterate their targets?
Yes.
4. Proportionality - was the amount of force used in keeping with that used by the enemy?
Yes.
The use of these devices are fully within the bounds of international law based on these principles. Some idiots like AOC think it is OK to use any argument to support here side, no matter how specious it it. She needs to be ridiculed and condemned as the terrorist apologist that she and the rest of Squaws are.
This is the same gaslighting crap that Obama used to pull.
“That’s not who we are” was a guilt trip laid on people for opposing unchecked immigration, giveaways of taxpayer money to freeloaders, promotion of the genetic dead-end homosexual agenda, and every other liberal attempt to ruin the country.