Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joseph Smith's Consent Needed to Enter Heaven (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 7, p.282-91)
http://www.utlm.org/onlineresources/sermons_talks_interviews/jofdvol7p282_291smithholdskeystoheaven.htm ^ | 1/22/03 | Brigham Young

Posted on 01/22/2003 3:16:06 PM PST by RnMomof7

Brigham Young Sermon:
Joseph Smith's Consent Needed to Enter Heaven
(Journal of Discourses, Vol. 7, p.282-91)

Quick Link

JOSEPH SMITH'S CONSENT NEEDED IN ORDER TO BE WITH GOD AND CHRIST IN HEAVEN


Brigham Young, October 9, 1859
Intelligence, Etc.
Remarks by President BRIGHAM YOUNG,
delivered in the Tabernacle, Great Salt Lake City, October 9, 1859.
Reported by G. D. Watt
Journal of Discourses, Vol. 7, p.282-91

I shall address you this morning upon a subject that is more interesting to me than any other pertaining to the life of man. It is a subject of deep study and research, and has been from age to age among the reflecting and philosophical portions of the human family. The intelligence given to the children of men is the subject to which I allude, and upon which has been expended more intellectual labour and profound thought than upon any other that has ever attracted the attention of man.

The Psalmist has written, "What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man that thou visitest him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour." This passage is but one of many which refer to the organization of man as though it were a great mystery—something that could not be fully comprehended by the greatest minds while dwelling in earthly tabernaeles. It is a matter of vital interest to each of us, and yet it is often farthest from the thoughts of the greater portion of mankind. Instead of reflecting upon and searching for hidden things of the greatest value to them, they rather wish to learn how to secure their way through this world as easily and as comfortably as possible. The reflections what they are here for, who produced them, and where they are from, far too seldom enter their minds.

Many have written upon this great; subject, and there exists a great variety of reflections, views, and opinions which I have not time to dwell upon in detail. I will merely give you a few texts, or what you may term a text-book. Nor shall I now take time to minutely elaborate any particular point, but will present such views as shall come into my mind, trusting that I shall have your faith and prayers to be able to edify both Saint and sinner, believer and unbeliever.

If the inhabitants of the earth throughly understood their own being, their views, feelings, faith, and affections would be very different from what they now are. Many believe in predestination, while others of the Christian world oppose that doctrine and exclusively advocate free grace, free will, free offering, etc.; and each party of Christians has its pet theory or doctrine, upon which it builds its hopes of eternal salvation. Such a course is like five or six hundred men each selecting and running off with a piece of the machinery of a cotton mill, and declaring that he had the cotton mill entire. This comparison may be truly applied to the Christian. world as it now is with regard to the holy and divine principles which have been revealed pertaining to eternal life and salvation.


---283---

Many of you, no doubt, have concluded that the doctrine of election and reprobation is true, and you do so with propriety, for it is true; it is a scriptural, doctrine. Others do not believe this doctrine, affirming with all their faith, might, and skill that free grace and freewill are or ought to be the foundation of man's faith in his Creator. Very well. I can also say to them that free grace and freewill are scripturally true. The first-named doctrine is as true as the second, and the second as the first. Others, again, declare that mankind have no will, neither free nor restrained, in their actions; for instance, the Rationalists or Freethinkers, who deny the existence and divinity of the Gods that we believe in. But so far from their believing their own theory, Mr. Neil, of Boston, while in prison for having no religion, wrote an essay, in which he declared that "All is God."

I might enumerate many more instances, and say that they are all right so far as they go in truth. The doctrine of freewill and conditional salvation, the doctrine of free grace and unconditional salvation, the doctrine of foreordination and reprobation, and many more that I have not time enumerate, can all be fully and satisfactorily proved by the Scriptures, and are true.

On the other hand, many untrue doctrines are taught and believed such as there being infants, not a span long, weltering in the flames of hell, there to remain throughout the countless ages of eternity, and the doctrine of total depravity. Some have gone so far as to say that a man or woman who wishes to be saved in the kingdom of God—who wishes to be a servant or handmaid of the Almighty, must feel that deep contrition of heart, that sound repentance, and such a sense of his or her unworthiness and nothingness, and of the supremacy; glory, and exaltation of that Deity they believe in, as to exclaim before God and their brethren and sisters that they are willing to be damned. To me that is one of the heights of nonsense; for if a person is willing to be damned, he cares not to make the efforts necessary to secure salvation. All this confusion is in the world—party against party—communities against communities—individuals against individuals. One sets out with five truths and fifteen errors, making the articles of his faith twenty; another dissents from him, rejects those five truths, selects perhaps five more, and adds as many errors as did the former one, and then he comes out a flaming reformer. Men, in dissenting from one another, have too often exercised no better judgment than to deny and dissent from many truths because their ancestors cherished and believed them, which has produced numerous parties, sects, and articles of faith, when, in fact, taking them in mass, they have an immense amount of true principles.

It was the occupation of Jesus Christ and his Apostles to propagate the Gospel of salvation and the principles of eternal life to the world, and it is our duty and calling, as ministers of the same salvation and Gospel, to gather every item of truth and reject every error. Whether a truth be found with professed infidels, or with the Universalists, or the Church of Rome, or the Methodists, the Church of England, the Presbyterians, the Baptists, the Quakers, the Shakers, or any other of the various and numerous different sects and parties, all of whom have more or less truth, it is the business of the Elders of this Church (Jesus, their elder brother, being at their head,) to gather up all the truths in the world pertaining to life and salvation, to the Gospel we preach, to mechanism of every kind, to the sciences, and to philosophy, wherever it may be found in every


---284---

nation, kindred, tongue, and people, and bring it to Zion.

The people upon this earth have a great many errors, and they have also a great many truths. This statement is not only true of the nations termed civilized—those. who profess to worship the true God, but is equally applicable to pagans of all countries, for in their religious rights and ceremonies may be found a great many truths which we will also gather home to Zion. All truth is for the salvation of the children of men—for their benefit and learning—for their furtherance in the principles of divine knowledge; and divine knowledge is any matter of fact—truth; and all truth pertains to divinity.

When we view mankind collectively, or as nations, communities, neighbourhoods, and families, we are led to inquire into the object of our being here and situated as we find ourselves to be. Did we produce ourselves, and endow ourselves with that knowledge and intelligence we now possess? All are ready to acknowledge that we had nothing to do with the origin of our being—that we were produced by a superior Power, without either the knowledge or the exercise of the agency we now possess. We know that we are here. We know that we live, breathe, and walk upon the earth. We know this naturally, as the brute creation knows. We know that our food and drink come from the elements around us: by them we are nourished, cherished, refreshed, and sustained, with the addition of sleep. We live and breathe, and breathe and live. Who can define and point out the particularities of the wonderful organization of man?

It enters into the minds of but few that the air we inhale is the greatest source of our life. We derive more real nourishment to our mortal tabernacles from this element than from the solid food we receive into our stomachs. Our lungs expand and contract to sustain the life which God has given us. Of the component parts of this great fountain of vitality I have not time to treat; but this interesting information you may gather in part from numerous works on natural philosophy. I will, however, say that the air is full of life and vitality, and its volume fills immensity. The relative terms height, depth, length, and breadth do not apply to it. Could you pass with the velocity of the electric fluid over telegraphic wires, during the continuation of more years than you can comprehend, you would still be surrounded by it and in the bosom of eternity as much as you now are; and it is filled with the spirit of life which emanates from God.

Many have tried to penetrate to the First Cause of all things; but it would be as easy for an ant to number the grains of sand on the earth. It is not for man, with his limited intelligence, to grasp eternity in his comprehension. There is an eternity of life, from which we were composed by the wisdom and skill of superior Beings. It would be as easy for a gnat to trace the history of man back to his origin as for man to fathom the First Cause of all things, lift the veil of eternity, and reveal the mysteries that have been sought after by philosophers from the beginning. What, then, should be the calling and duty of the children of men? Instead of inquiring after the origin of the Gods—instead of trying to explore the depths of eternities that have been, that are, and that will be,—instead of endeavouring to discover the boundaries of boundless space, let them seek to know the object of their present existence, and how to apply, in the most profitable manner for their mutual good and salvation, the intelligence they possess. Let them seek to know and thoroughly understand


---285---

things within their reach, and to make themselves well acquainted with the object of their being here, by diligently seeking unto a superior Power for information, and by the careful study of the best books.

The life that is within us is a part of an eternity of life, and is organized spirit, which is clothed upon by tabernacles, thereby constituting our present being, which is designed for the attainment of further intelligence. The matter composing our bodies and spirits has been organized from the eternity of matter that fills immensity.

Were I to fully speak what I know and understand concerning myself and others, you might think me to be infringing. I shall therefore omit some things that I would otherwise say to you if the people were prepared to receive them.

Jesus Christ says, "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent." We are not now in a capacity to know him in his fulness of glory. We know a few things that he has revealed concerning himself, but there are a great many which we do not know. When people have secured to themselves eternal life, they are where they can understand the true character of their Father and God, and the object of the creation, fall, and redemption of man after the creation of this world. These points have ever been subjects for speculation with all classes of believers, and are subjects of much interest, to those who entertain a deep anxiety to know how to secure to themselves eternal life. Our bodies are organized from the eternity of matter, from such matter as we breathe, and from such matter as is found in the vegetable and mineral kingdoms. This matter is organized into a world, with all its appendages, by whom? By the Almighty and women who are made in the image of God.

All this vast creation was produced from element in its unorganized state; the mountains, rivers, seas, valleys, plains, and the animal, vegetable, and mineral kingdoms beneath and around us, all speaking forth the wonderful works of the Great God. Shall I say that the seeds of vegetables were planted here by the Characters that framed and, built this world—that the seeds of every plant composing the vegetable kingdom were brought from another world? This would be news to many of you. Who brought them here? It matters little to us whether it was John, James, William, Adam, or Bartholomew who brought them; but it was some Being who had power to frame this earth with its seas, valleys, mountains, and rivers, and cause it to teem with vegetable and animal life.

Here let me state to all philosophers of every class upon the earth, When you tell me that father Adam was made as we make adobies from the earth, you tell me what I deem an idle tale. When you tell me that the beasts of the field were produced in that manner, you are speaking idle words devoid of meaning. There is no such thing in all the eternities where the Gods dwell. Mankind are here because they are the offspring of parents who were first brought here from another planet, and power was given them to propagate their species, and they were commanded to multiply and replenish the earth. The offspring of Adam and Eve are commanded to take the rude elements, and, by the knowledge God has given, to convert them into everything required for their life, health, adornment, wealth, comfort, and consolation. Have we the knowledge to do this? We have. Who gave us this knowledge? Our Father who made us; for he is the only wise God, and to


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; History; Mainline Protestant; Other non-Christian; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: bom; cult; cults; faith; frauds; gods; heresy; josephsmith; latterdaysaints; lds; mormon; mormonchurch; nephi; nephites; salvation; science; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 801-806 next last
To: Jerry_M
I married a Scot as well. My children haven't forgiven me yet.
(100% "South of Hadrian's Wall" English in my ancestry.)

Mixed marriages hardly ever work. The children end up hating and trying to kill themselves (and each other)! Don't worry though lad, we'll no hold it against ye. Nae, we'll no cut yer head off either.

701 posted on 01/30/2003 9:32:34 AM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (Where's my bloody axe an' sharpenin stone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M; OrthodoxPresbyterian; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; RnMomof7; CCWoody; Matchett-PI
It seems to me that a Sola Scriptura position should take respectful note of the fact that we have no information as to where she got the "Don't even touch it!" idea.

I am not currently sure where we should go with that, but I do think we need to make the divinely-inspired lack of information prominent in our lapsarian doctrine somehow.

It seems to me that while we are talking about the Fall--which was a crime involving lack of respect for what God said and what God did not say--we could wind up screwing up ROYALLY.

***

I also think that the whole matter has to be tied into what Paul says in the New Testament concerning the "touch not, taste not" mentality of fallen sinners.

I also think that we need to tie it into the fact that Paul uses the circumstances of what happened in the Fall as an argument that women are not to be pastors.

***

I am going to have to sit this one out.

702 posted on 01/30/2003 9:34:14 AM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord; OrthodoxPresbyterian; the_doc
Were we to look exclusively at the Gospel of Mark, we could not prove that Jesus spoke those words on the Cross.

before you jump on this point, Oh debate champion, let me extend and revise by saying that we also cannot disprove that Jesus spoke the word tetelestai either.

To:the_doc.

Well lad, you're nae gettin away tha easy!

Actually, these events happened before man became a sinner, so those considerations can fall by the wayside in your thinking.

703 posted on 01/30/2003 9:48:34 AM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (Where's my bloody axe an' sharpenin stone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 694 | View Replies]

To: the_doc; drstevej
they went out from you and were not of you

I would agree with that.

Although they came out of you and have parodied from you some of what they once were, You are not bakerism, or millerism, or russelism, or moonism. You don't even faintly resemble them.

704 posted on 01/30/2003 9:52:00 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; the_doc
(I don't know if I really want us to be "kissin' cousins" with you!) ~ Jerry_M Woody.
705 posted on 01/30/2003 9:57:43 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: ponyespresso; OrthodoxPresbyterian
Welcome abord lad or lass, which ever the case may be!

I'm sorry to intrude. I have been in luke mode for quite a while and am nervous to emerge for several reasons. But, quickly, I really do need to ask, where do you get that she heard this false teaching from Adam. Why couldn't she have came up with this idea herself?

That in itself is another topic. Alternate causuality is an option that we have not looked at as of yet, but it seems IMHO, to be a valid option.

you have been wise to lurk, some of these people...i'd worry about...especially that OrthodoxPresbyterian (havin some fun here OP!) character!!! You never know what those guys are liable to invent!

Welcome aboard none the less!

706 posted on 01/30/2003 10:00:59 AM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (Where's my bloody axe an' sharpenin stone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: xzins; drstevej; Jean Chauvin
Hey guys, let's really upset the apple cart, and discuss Charles Finney before the opposition does...although one would wonder why they would...
707 posted on 01/30/2003 10:08:17 AM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (Where's my bloody axe an' sharpenin stone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord; OrthodoxPresbyterian; Jerry_M; CCWoody; RnMomof7; Jean Chauvin; gdebrae; ...
All I was saying was that we need to follow Sola Scriptura.

(The fact that the things you folks are discussing happened before men were constituted as sinners doesn't change that, as far as I can tell.)

708 posted on 01/30/2003 10:09:54 AM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Finney's an interesting character. We had some big discussions of him about a year ago. Someone posted a few of his sermons.

There was something odd in his theology, but I forget what it was.
709 posted on 01/30/2003 10:10:52 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody; Jerry_M
Ah, you have cut me to the quick...I think.

(Actually, I haven't the FOGGIEST idea what you two are talking about. This suggests that either I need to pay closer attention to you or I need to ignore you altogether [ha!])

710 posted on 01/30/2003 10:16:12 AM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies]

To: xzins; drstevej; Jean Chauvin
There was something odd in his theology, but I forget what it was.

Probably that he was actually a Pelagian (spit!!) who held to an exclusive governmental view of the attonement, thus denying it's actual sacrificial nature.

711 posted on 01/30/2003 10:19:03 AM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (Where's my bloody axe an' sharpenin stone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Article VII—Of Original or Birth Sin Original sin standeth not in the following of Adam (as the Pelagians do vainly talk), but it is the corruption of the nature of every man, that naturally is engendered of the offspring of Adam, whereby man is very far gone from original righteousness, and of his own nature inclined to evil, and that continually.

What do you call it when you believe humans have original sin and are therefore guilty AND believe that it becomes ESPECIALLY your own (fully guilty) when you actually COMMIT sin?

Guilty and Fully Guilty. I think that's what the discussion was about. (at least for me)

712 posted on 01/30/2003 10:26:59 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Dr. Eckleburg
"I'd be careful saying Wesley launched from Calvinist roots. The Church of England began as a politial experiment. If it sided with "calvinism/lutheranism" initially, it was only because that was the opposition to the pope that Henry VIII needed at the moment."

The Thirty-nine Articles of Religion
of the Church of England.

Article XVII
Of Predestination and Election
Predestination to life is the everlasting purpose of God, whereby, before the foundations of the world were laid, He hath constantly decreed by His counsel secret to us, to deliver from curse and damnation those whom He hath chosen in Christ out of mankind, and to bring them by Christ to everlasting salvation as vessels made to honour. Wherefore they which be endued with so excellent a benefit of God be called according to God's purpose by His Spirit working in due season; they through grace obey the calling; they be justified freely; they be made sons of God by adoption; they be made like the image of His only-begotten Son Jesus Christ; they walk religiously in good works; and at length by God's mercy they attain to everlasting felicity. As the godly consideration of Predestination and our Election in Christ is full of sweet, pleasant, and unspeakable comfort to godly persons and such as feel in themselves the working of the Spirit of Christ, mortifying the works of the flesh and their earthly members and drawing up their mind to high and heavenly things, as well because it doth greatly establish and confirm their faith of eternal salvation to be enjoyed through Christ, as because it doth fervently kindle their love towards God: so for curious and carnal persons, lacking the Spirit of Christ, to have continually before their eyes the sentence of God's Predestination is a most dangerous downfall, whereby the devil doth thrust them either into desperation or into wretchlessness of most unclean living no less perilous than desperation.

Furthermore, we must receive God's promises in such wise as they be generally set forth in Holy Scripture; and in our doings that will of God is to be followed which we have expressly declared unto us in the word of God.

(The Articles of 1571 given in English and Latin, the assent of which is still required of clergy in the Church of England.)

From here

713 posted on 01/30/2003 10:54:16 AM PST by Jean Chauvin (Don't you ever verify your facts before you make these statements?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 712 | View Replies]

To: Jean Chauvin
Jean, I know that they had the Articles and that one of them was predestinarian. But they were hot and cold over that stuff. Hot in cromwell's day and cold in george's.

And I don't think Henry cared at all. He was just looking for political cover when he switched 'cause the pope wouldn't give him his way. Elizabeth continued to need that cover against Rome with all the intrigue of getting Spain to attack and rewin the crown for the Church.

714 posted on 01/30/2003 10:58:46 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Article VII—Of Original or Birth Sin Original sin standeth not in the following of Adam (as the Pelagians do vainly talk), but it is the corruption of the nature of every man, that naturally is engendered of the offspring of Adam, whereby man is very far gone from original righteousness, and of his own nature inclined to evil, and that continually.

X, (sigh...), you need to identify the citations, i have no idea if this came from Finney or not. None the less, "the devil is in the details", look closely at the emphasised sections, and compare it with the definition of Original Sin. Place the source, and i will reserve comment until you do.

715 posted on 01/30/2003 11:27:35 AM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (Where's my bloody axe an' sharpenin stone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 712 | View Replies]

To: the_doc; Jerry_M; RnMomof7; OrthodoxPresbyterian; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Jean Chauvin; Wrigley; ...
"I haven't the FOGGIEST idea what you two are talking about."



Hmmmm! I hope this wasn't your "stuff" they found on the roof.

Pot Found Growing On ***Baptist*** Church Roof

http://www.local6.com/orlpn/news/stories/news-194251520030129-080120.html
716 posted on 01/30/2003 11:33:59 AM PST by CCWoody (Sheesh, and I thought Baptists were boring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
No, Florida is right next to Texas, but it's still a different state.
717 posted on 01/30/2003 11:36:11 AM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 716 | View Replies]

To: Jean Chauvin; fortheDeclaration
by His counsel secret to us

FYI, FTD.

718 posted on 01/30/2003 11:40:43 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
The first part was intended to be the correct standard: Articles of Religion (Methodist but I think its a copy of the Anglican)

Then there were my comments. You weren't to comment on the Article 7, but on my comments.

Guess that could have been more clear, couldn't it? :>)
719 posted on 01/30/2003 11:47:38 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 715 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
Ahhh, but they do seem to be Reformed Baptists:

From Statement of faith:
V. Election. Election is God's eternal choice of some persons unto everlasting life – not because of foreseen merit in them but of his mere mercy in Christ – in consequence of which choice they are called, justified and glorified.

But, where could you hide plants on a roof like that?
720 posted on 01/30/2003 11:54:36 AM PST by CCWoody (Sheesh, and I thought Baptists were boring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 801-806 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson