Colleen Kollar-Kotelly Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
What a despicable person.
What a disgrace. This judge should be removed from the bench.
Be a shame if the “judge” up and “disappeared.”
Political prisoner: “I’m old and frail. I might die in prison!”
Democrat judge: “Let your religion save you.”
Murder innocent babies, no problem.
Protest the murder of innocent babies, go to jail.
We live in a sick, sick country. God help us.
What a despicable person.
Hell is waiting for you Kollar-Kotelly, enjoy.
Blatantly displays how quickly our nation is devolving as these ingrates continue to dismiss GOD and worship Satan. This judge along with many others will face judgement in the end and their sentence won’t be pleasant, unless they truly turn to GOD and repent and seek salvation through our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
To a Satanist, praying to almighty God that he would change the heart of a mother so that she would not murder her child, I imagine would be violence.
This is her judicial bio. She’s not only ancient, she’s evil.
At probably around 83 years old, she’s old enough to have been bought and sold a dozen times over the years.
Senior Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Judge Kollar-Kotelly was appointed to the United States District Court in May 1997. She received a B.A. in 1965 from The Catholic University of America and a J.D. in 1968 from Columbus School of Law, The Catholic University of America.
Following law school, she served as law clerk to Judge Catherine B. Kelly of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. From 1969 to 1972, Judge Kollar-Kotelly was an attorney in the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and then served as the chief legal counsel to Saint Elizabeths Hospital until 1984.
She was appointed Associate Judge of the D.C. Superior Court in October 1984, and served as Deputy Presiding Judge of the Criminal Division from 1995 until her appointment to the federal bench.
Judge Kollar-Kotelly has been a Fellow of the American Bar Association, a founding member of the Thurgood Marshall Inn of Court, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University School of Medicine in a joint teaching program on mental health and the law, and chair of the Board of the Art Trust for Superior Court.
Judge Kotelly was appointed by Chief Justice Rehnquist to serve as a member of the Judicial Conference Committee on Financial Disclosure from June 2000 through May 2002, and in May 2002 Chief Justice Rehnquist appointed Judge Kotelly to serve as Presiding Judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court , which is a 7-year appointment.
Staff Information
Chambers: (202) 354-3340
Courtroom Deputy: (202) 354-3189
and now you know how the nazis came to power
More on Mrs Harlow here: She’s been under house arrest for months but the absolute bitch of a judge will not count any of that as time served. Kollar-Kotelly is real servant of the devil.
Another elderly convict in the case — and the sister of Jean Marshall — is Paulette Harlow, 75, of Kingston, Massachusetts. Harlow, a Catholic, was found guilty on Nov. 16, 2023, of felony conspiracy against civil rights and violating the FACE Act.
She was sentenced to 24 months of incarceration but has remained under house arrest throughout the proceedings of the case because of her severe health issues.
Speaking to CNA from her home in a phone call in early June, she said she has multiple health issues: diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, spinal stenosis, severe arthritis in her neck, sleep apnea, bronchial asthma, fibromyalgia, neuropathy in both of her feet, migraine headaches, arthritis in her right hip, psoriasis in her left hip, and tinnitus in her left ear, which is causing short-term memory loss.
Harlow’s lawyer, Allen Orenberg, told CNA last November after her conviction that he was “optimistic” that the judge would sentence Harlow to home detention, given her health issues.
“Mrs. Harlow has some significant medical issues that need to be addressed on a regular basis. And the judge said on the record that this will allow her to see her doctors rather than having to deal with the Bureau of Prisons at this stage where the level or the quality of medical care may not be the same,” he said.
But he was wrong. On May 31, Judge Kollar-Kotelly, who sentenced each of the defendants in the case, handed down a sentence of two years of imprisonment.
Orenberg told CNA after her sentencing that Harlow would be sent to a “medical prison,” a facility that is able to offer a high level of care.
But Harlow is still at home, under house arrest, while awaiting a spot to open up in the medical prison. She told CNA that she gets no credit for time served.
She said that during her eight months of confinement, she has not been legally allowed to leave her home to attend Mass at her local parish. On several occasions, a priest has come to her home to celebrate Mass. Her husband brings her home holy Communion consistently, she said.
She told CNA that she is “concerned” about going to the prison but “not afraid because I know wherever I’m going, Jesus is going before me.”
Leaving her husband, she said, will be the hardest part. Harlow said it was an “honor to work and stand up before the unborn.”
“I’m heartbroken for all of us. I’m heartbroken for America. I really am,” she said.
https://www.ncregister.com/cna/locked-up-meet-the-elderly-and-infirm-women-now-in-prison-for-pro-life-activism
The stench from the bench is making me clench, with apologies to Michael Savage
These people will start disappearing if we get into a limited war with Russia. I am surprised this judge hasn’t been removed. Normally old people are locked up for murder, let alone preventing one.
Yup. The judge’s term in Hell is likely to last a lot longer than two years.
Someday Colleen will be judged by a Higher Judge.
apparently there is ALWAYS room in jail for J6 protestors and other conservatives!
But never enough room for murderers and rapists!
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly - what a See you next Thursday.
But in accordance with your hardness and your impenitent heart you are treasuring up for yourself wrath in the day of wrath
Romans 2:5
In my opinion, the judge shouldn’t be opining on a “tenant of the defendant’s religion”.
That statement may have left open a chance that the prisoner could have her conviction reversed on appeal based on the judge’s antagonism towards what she thinks is the prisoner’s religious beliefs.