Posted on 07/07/2019 9:21:48 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
Pope Francis, starting back in 2014, instituted Islamic prayers to the moon god allah in the Vatican. In 2018, he told a photographer that he was the Devil then walked away laughing about it. In 2019, he called for all Catholic schools to begin teaching about Islam, and he signed a Universal Brotherhood concordat with Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb after kissing him on the mouth. Did I say Pope Francis was the False Prophet? Hmm, now that I think about it, he sounds more like Antichrist.
FROM LEO HOHMANN: The Vatican has released the preparatory document for its upcoming Pan-Amazonian Synod of bishops in October, and it contains yet another window into Pope Francis green-friendly worldview in which he subtly and deceptively turns traditional, biblical Christianity on its head. You will recall that just a couple of months ago a group of more than 30 Catholic scholars and clergy signed an open letter to the bishops, pleading that they hold the pope accountable for his anti-Christian, anti-Catholic teachings with regard to marriage, moral teaching, etc. They declared him guilty of at least seven heresies.
His latest stunner is his Instrumentum Laboris document which says that the pagan Gaia worship of the Earth done by the tribal people of the Amazon fits in perfectly with the teachings and doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church. Francis for some time now has been pushing this New Age gospel, and now he is launching it with the Amazonians.
Oh!!
THIS is how to describe it!
Why don't your turn your soapbox and turn it towards your own chosen religion, instead of attempting to instruct Protestants on their faith in Christ alone?
The WORLD can see the RULES set down for HIS church in ACTS chapter 15.
YOUR church looks NOTHING like it!!!
He did? Is it in the rules now?
Per his post on another thread it is.
You even questioned it!
"The one who dies; wearing the most trinkets; stands a better chance of getting it right.", would be MY guess.
Just call Gaia the Queen of Heaven.
As usual; you FAIL to discern the distinction of Mary; found in the Bible; and MARY: found in Rome's imagination.
The way it's written:
I don't recall; from the Book that Rome gave to the world; any timeline that states just WHEN Judas died.
Matthew 27:110 states that, after learning that Jesus was to be crucified, Judas was overcome by remorse and attempted to return the 30 pieces of silver to the priests, but they would not accept them because they were blood money, so he threw them on the ground and left. Afterwards, he committed suicide by hanging himself.[35] 3 Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, 4 Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? see thou to that. 5 And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.
Acts 1:18 states that Judas used the money to buy a field,[35][36] and "[fell] headlong... burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out."[35]
16 Men and brethren, this scripture must needs have been fulfilled, which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus.
17 For he was numbered with us, and had obtained part of this ministry.
18 Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.
I do remember that, but it doesn’t seem to be a black and white rule given there have been numerous caucus threads about Francis since then.
Just because the ‘rule’ is occasionally unenforced; it does NOT mean the ‘rule’ is NOT a ‘rule’.
Based upon the judgment of the unofficial FR RC magisterium, it seems that even Pope Francis may be excluded:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3761823/posts?page=108#108
Religion Moderator: Being as you and many other Catholic posters have proclaimed that the Pope is not Catholic, we will remove the Catholic Caucus label because this thread is about a non-Catholic. - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3685496/posts?page=8#8
If it is the general consensus here at the FR Religion Forum that the Pope is NOT a Catholic, then yes posts about him will not qualify for the Catholic caucus label. - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3685496/posts?page=19#19
I guess if the ruling still stands, then it needs to be added to the RF guidelines.
Never got an answer, did ya?
Not yet...
;^)
Ooops, forgot to ping you to that.
See post 213, which is your recent comment on another thread.
Sorry about that.
Most people probably are not aware of the RM's comments on the topic..
I just find it ironic that the constant pope bashing from Roman Catholics may have introduced a new rule that restricts the caucus label involving threads about the pope.
IF Christians posted these articles criticizing the pope as much as Roman Catholics do I can only imagine the feigned cries of "Roman Catholic bashing" from the usual suspects.
The law of unintended consequences.
Besides, I’ve seen a number of threads posted by certain Roman Catholics that violate the caucus rules. They’re just not always called on it.
Don’t hold your breath.
“You guys survived the Eastern Split; countless evil popes; Luther; Vatican II...
...so you’re gonna ‘get over this As well.”
I guess you’ve forgotten that I am a former Mormon, not a Catholic from the crap storm you start every time someone mentions Mormons.
So, besides being anti-Mormon, I see you are anti-Catholic too. Exactly what are you, an atheist or just a $hit disturber with too much time on your hands?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.