Posted on 03/18/2015 7:30:19 AM PDT by Salvation
Some years ago, the Church gave wider permission for cremation and also lifted traditional restrictions on having cremated remains present in the church for funeral Masses. All of this is pastorally understandable. Very few if any people these days choose cremation for the reasons it had traditionally been forbidden, namely as a denial of the resurrection of the body. Generally the reasons chosen are economic, due to the increasingly high cost of traditional burial and the difficulty, especially in urban areas, of finding room for large cemeteries. The basic norms from the church regarding cremation are these:
The Church earnestly recommends that the pious custom of burying the bodies of the dead be observed; it does not, however, forbid cremation unless it has been chosen for reasons which are contrary to Christian teaching (Code of Canon Law No. 1176, 3).
Although cremation is now permitted by the Church, it does not enjoy the same value as burial of the body. The Church clearly prefers and urges that the body of the deceased be present for the funeral rites, since the presence of the human body better expresses the values which the Church affirms in those rites (Order of Christian Funerals no. 413).
The cremated remains of a body should be treated with the same respect given to the human body from which they come. This includes the use of a worthy vessel to contain the ashes, the manner in which they are carried, and the care and attention to appropriate placement and transport, and the final disposition. The cremated remains should be buried in a grave or entombed in a mausoleum or columbarium. The practice of scattering cremated remains on the sea, from the air, or on the ground, or keeping cremated remains in the home of a relative or friend of the deceased are not the reverent disposition that the Church requires (cf Order of Christian Funerals # 417).
From a pastoral point of view, these norms are clear and understandable. However, as a pastor, I must say that I have growing concerns over practices that are appearing with the more widespread use of cremation.
The norms clearly indicate that cremated remains are not to be scattered, divided, or retained in the homes of the faithful on fireplace mantles, on shelves, or in other places. But these norms are somewhat difficult to enforce.
The problem emerges essentially from the detachment of the funeral Mass from interment. When cremation is chosen, it is common for the funeral Mass to be celebrated quickly but the burial to be scheduled at some “later date” when arrangements can be more conveniently made. Frequently clergy are told that the family will “call back” at some point in the future. But often these calls never come and burials are put off indefinitely.
Issues such as money, logistics, and family disputes are often factors in the delay. Priests, too, are often busy and do not have time to follow up to see if “Uncle Joe” is ready for burial now. As such, many deceased remain unburied for weeks, months, or years, or perhaps never even buried at all.
I was shocked a couple of years ago to discover that a certain Catholic family still had the cremated remains of an uncle on the top shelf of their closet. The delay centered around who in the family was going to pay for the burial lot and debates about whether burial was even necessary at all. Perhaps the ashes could just be scattered out in the woods.
Without the urgency to bury the dead, the burial is often given little regard.
Another concern came to my attention during recent funeral preparations. There was a tense debate going on among the assembled family members as to who would get to keep the ashes and who would not. The crematorium had offered to dispense ashes to different family members in sealed boxes or urns (for a price of course) and the debate seemed to center on whether certain family members were “qualified” to get some of “Mom” or not. Yikes! And when I instructed them that no division of the remains should take place at all, but rather that burial had to be arranged, I was greeted with puzzled stares and eventual “assurances” that such burial would be arranged “in due time,” once the family could work out their differences.
But things have gotten even worse.
Many funeral homes are now offering “jewelry” made from the cremated remains of loved ones or with the remains sealed within the jewelry. If you don’t believe me, click HERE, HERE, or HERE. The ghoulishness and bad taste are surpassed only by the shock of how suddenly such bizarre practices have been introduced. One can imagine the following awful dialogue: “Hey, that’s pretty new jewelry! Was that your Mom’s?” “Well, actually it is Mom!” Double yikes!
Cremation is certainly here to stay. And I do not doubt there are sound pastoral reasons for its use. However, the norms of the Church insist that cremated remains be treated with the same respect as the body. And just as we would not scatter body parts in the woods, or divide up limbs and torsos to distribute to family members, or put fingers into resin and wear them as earrings, neither should we do this with cremated remains. These ARE the remains of a human being and they are to be buried or placed in a mausoleum with the same respect due the uncremated body.
I think pastors are going to have to teach more explicitly on this matter and that bishops may need to issues norms that will help to prevent problems. One helpful norm might be to refuse to celebrate a funeral Mass until proper burial is scheduled. I am unclear if a pastor alone can do this, but surely a diocese must also have an increasingly firm and clear policy of which people are widely informed.
Simply permitting cremation without well-thought-out policies has proven to be a mistake. I pray that a post like this may provoke thought from all of us in the Church as to how to deal pastorally with a situation that is degrading quickly. We must do some teaching, but we also must not cooperate with bad practices.
The website of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has proposed a possible solution for Catholic cemeteries to offer to families who are financially unable to bury the cremated remains of loved ones:
For some families, the choice of cremation is based on financial hardship, so this choice often means also that there is no plan for committal or burial of the cremated remains. As a means of providing pastoral support and an acceptable respectful solution to the problem of uninterred cremated remains, one diocese offered on All Souls’ Day in 2011 an opportunity for any family who desired it the interment of cremated remains. The diocese offered a Mass and committal service at one of its Catholic cemeteries and provided, free of charge, a common vault in a mausoleum for the interment of the cremated remains. The names of the deceased interred there were kept on file, though in this case they were not individually inscribed on the vault. [1]
I am interested in your thoughts and experiences and hope to share them with my bishop and my fellow clergy
I’d want to be there, or somewhere like it... but not burned up... not embalmed... if anything, I’d like to be food for the critters.
Have you seen the new book “Voices of Missouri Rivers” ?
It’s just out from MDC and a pretty good read.
Nice, we scattered my fathers ashes on the site of
the log cabin where he was born. Also a little bit of
him rides with me in my truck.
I am a Buddhist and would like my remains to be
put in the fork of a tree so the birds of the sky
can feast on my flesh, sadly there are laws against
that now but the law never stopped me from doing what
is right.
Cremation was a pagan practice in both Rome and the Germanic lands. It was a way to speed either rebirth in another life or to destroy the body because there was nothing left.
Both implied that the body was not being resurrected
It’s “not a Christian practice” to spend ridiculous sums of money your family needs.
The bones are placed inside the urn with the ashes. This is why a childs urn is smaller than an adults urn.
Actually, in the case of the glass jewelry/suncatchers the ashes or hair clippings burn up and become bubbles at those temperatures. It’s really not creepy at all.
Resin would be another matter.
In early America people would make bracelets of braided hair.
Getting eaten by worms isn’t?
I thought the manufacture of diamonds from compression only produced industrial quality diamonds, but maybe I am wrong.
Or you could be a cubic zirconium.
But those are not worth that much, so this strategy may need re-thinking.
Nice, looks a lot like my place only mine is swampier.
An ash grinder is used to reduce large pieces.
Great minds. :-)
I have an empty 40MM shell and plan in spend eternity in there - the dummy projectile will keep me from wandering.
Besides my name and stats, I will add an inscription: "It appears there is a slight flaw in my theory of immortality".
“Instead of a funeral Ive asked that they have a gathering to celebrate my life and tell stories about me and how I affected and influenced their lives.”
I lost a close friend last year and this was his wish also. Lots of tears and laughter. I now have plans to do the same.
I’ve been in attendance at numerous scattering of seaman’s ashes at sea ceremonies. The ceremonies took place on the fantail.
One stood out as a memory. We had a following sea and when the ashes were being poured out they didn’t go down but drifted up and scattered on everybody standing there. The skipper quickly dropped the box and there was a loud thud when it hit the ocean.
I never thought about it much until I heard my favorite Baptist, Al Mohler, say the burial of an actual body is the last witness to others of the departed Christian’s hope of a bodily resurrection. Granted God will give me a new body and it doesn’t really matter where my body is, a six foot hole or the bottom of the deep blue sea.
Kind of resonated with me though.
Any bones left after cremation get ground up with the ashes them turned over to the family. That’s the reason some of the ash looks like sand.
Not only on this matter.
bfl
Indeed the practice of the sacred “reliquaries” as proof of sainthood or physical proof for belief— exactly like “doubting Thomas” their way to deal with the masses doubting.
Sales, inotherwords.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.