Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Prayer/Veneration/Worship to Mary Biblical?
self | 12-14-14 | ealgeone

Posted on 12/14/2014 11:57:21 AM PST by ealgeone

The reason for this article is to determine if the worship/veneration given to Mary by the catholic church is justified from a Biblical perspective. This will be evaluated using the Biblical standard and not man’s standard.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: bible; blessedvirginmary; catholic; mary; mystery; mysterybabylon; prayer; rcinventions; vanities; vanity; worship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,741-4,7604,761-4,7804,781-4,800 ... 6,861-6,870 next last
To: terycarl; metmom
>>I think that you and I both know that the problem is not mine....<<

By your own admission in post 4602 your faith is in the Catholic Church. That's a problem and it's yours.

4,761 posted on 01/02/2015 6:15:29 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4644 | View Replies]

To: MamaB
>>I simply do not think y’all worship Jesus.<<

It certainly is not the Jesus of scripture.

4,762 posted on 01/02/2015 6:18:12 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4646 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
We are not told the reasoning that Jesus asked John to take care of her. What we do know is that after Pentecost there is nothing written regarding her. If she had been as important as the Catholics claim we can be assured that the Holy Spirit would have included something.

The Catholics even claim that all of the apostles were present when she died as was Jesus. Surely the appearance of Jesus on earth would have been significant and would have been recorded. Of course that would also be contrary to Jesus own words that He would not return until the end of days.

It's clear the scripture points to Jesus alone and not to Mary.

4,763 posted on 01/02/2015 6:38:48 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4691 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; Mark17
>> Catholics today do NOT think those dudes from olden tymes knew anything.<<

They are Protestants? Who knew??

4,764 posted on 01/02/2015 6:49:37 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4719 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
Since you volunteered you were re baptized by an SBC chaplain, a follow up question begs an answer; are you still a member of an SBC church ? thanks

Well, I have to go back in history here. I was baptized in the pool in Vietnam, sometime in 1970. It was by a Southern Baptist Chaplain, named Chaplain Hall. I knew mostly nothing about any denominations. I was at Mountain Home AFB, Idaho, previous to going to Vietnam when I first came to the Lord, or maybe he came to me, I don't know which, but the guys took me to a church in Boise, Idaho, called Cole Comunity Church. They did not have a denominational name, which I thought was kind of weird. Anyway, the Chaplain in Vietnam told me I was being placed into the membership of Trinity Baptist Church, San Antonio, Tx, though I still did not know much about what that meant. I then went to Laughlin AFB, Del Rio, TX. Over several months, I visited Lutheran churches, Methodist churches. I was pretty turned off by them. I didn't even think they preached about Jesus there, remembering that each church is independent, but those Del Rio churches were pretty much apostate, as far as I could tell. I went to an Assembly of God church, which I thought was ok. Then I went to 1st Baptist church, and I listened for a couple of months, to see what they preached. I thought it was good, so I joined up, but I was still pretty active with the Navigators. When I was at Travis AFB, I was a member of a SBC in Fairfield, CA, but after about 15 years, I felt like they were not so much into preaching the Word anymore, so I left and attended Calvary Chapel in Fairfield. Each SBC is totally independent of others, so each stands or falls on it's own. Maybe this was a tad long, but you asked, so here it is 😄

Air Force regards.

4,765 posted on 01/02/2015 6:50:18 AM PST by Mark17 (I'm a new creation, I'm a soul set free, and the man I was, you no longer see. Praise Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4749 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

“you” was plural, a reference to the Protestant Reformation in general.


4,766 posted on 01/02/2015 7:27:36 AM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4688 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Christ is one mediator. Saints are intercessors. I cannot explain the same thing ten times because people can type faster than they read.


4,767 posted on 01/02/2015 7:36:11 AM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4611 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
I proved, -- in fact, it is obvious, -- that in this passage:

the Lord Jesus, the same night in which he was betrayed, took bread. And giving thanks, broke, and said: Take ye, and eat: this is my body, which shall be delivered for you: this do for the commemoration of me. In like manner also the chalice, after he had supped, saying: This chalice is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as often as you shall drink, for the commemoration of me. For as often as you shall eat this bread, and drink the chalice, you shall shew the death of the Lord, until he come. Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord. But let a man prove himself: and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of the chalice. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself, not discerning the body of the Lord. Therefore are there many infirm and weak among you, and many sleep. (1 Cor. 11:23-30)
the "body" and "blood" refers to the consecrated Eucharist because they cite the words of Christ referring to his body and blood at the Last Supper. When Protestants deny that, they look comical and do no favor to their religion. now everyone can see that Protestant theories are not based on the Holy Scripture altogether, but rather on your notions what the Scripture should or should not be saying.
4,768 posted on 01/02/2015 7:41:59 AM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4612 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I do not remember the original context, nor even who the poster was, but it is my general opinion based on threads like this that Protestants as a group do not follow Jesus at all: they only see in the Bible what they think should be there, and they do not pray to saints who demonstrably did follow Christ. I understand it is upsetting to hear, but this is what you (collectively) need to hear.


4,769 posted on 01/02/2015 7:47:06 AM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4692 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

See 4,768. People who have a habit of reading the Bible don’t ask questions like this.


4,770 posted on 01/02/2015 7:49:07 AM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4709 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; redleghunter; EagleOne; metmom; boatbums
I see a trend

Your religion would garner greater respect if when something is in the scripture you recognized it to be there.

4,771 posted on 01/02/2015 7:51:12 AM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4724 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
and Mountain Meadows

My opinion is, that John D Lee got what was coming to him, but a whole bunch of others, got away with a ton of murders.

4,772 posted on 01/02/2015 7:52:34 AM PST by Mark17 (I'm a new creation, I'm a soul set free, and the man I was, you no longer see. Praise Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4758 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
Both Jesus and Mary are said to have a fullness of grace and the expressions used are different. St. Stephen case is a Latin Vulgate mistransaltion.
Mary: κεχαριτωμενη, normatively translated "full of grace" or to obfuscate the meaning, "greatly favored" or something like that (Luke 1:28)

Jesus Christ: πληρης χαριτος, "full of grace"

St. Stephen: πληρης πιστεως και δυναμεως, "full of faith and power", Douay is in error here.


4,773 posted on 01/02/2015 8:01:02 AM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4734 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; metmom; redleghunter; ealgeone; boatbums

I learned Revelation 18:4, and also everything from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21 from the Holy Catholic Church; and with the help of the saints of the Holy Catholic Church I retain what I learned.


4,774 posted on 01/02/2015 8:03:12 AM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4745 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; metmom

the very Catechism of the Catholic church

424 Moved by the grace of the Holy Spirit and drawn by the Father, we believe in Jesus and confess: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”8 On the rock of this faith confessed by St. Peter, Christ built his Church.9 (683, 552)


Is there anything in this section of the Catechism, 422 through 455, that you find to be in error?


4,775 posted on 01/02/2015 8:17:04 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4750 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
Air Force regards

Thank you for your service, and your straight answer. I find it correlates well with my research.

4,776 posted on 01/02/2015 8:26:07 AM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4765 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Since you volunteered you were re baptized by an SBC chaplain, a follow up question begs an answer; are you still a member of an SBC church ? thanks
Being baptized in a church or by a pastor of that church, does not by default make you a *member* of that church, contrary to Catholic thinking on the matter.

Church membership is a different thing and often simply a technicality for being able to participate in the church government.

Catholics really need to learn to look at things from a different perspective.


This is a lesson I learned in my own family. My parents were my daughter’s Godparents. Or, technically, Dad as a Catholic was a sponsor (godparent) and Mom as a Methodist was a witness. Which is ironic because my Mom did a better job of raising me as a Catholic than many nominal Catholics do raising their own children. Dad was hurt when my daughter said she was going to be baptized at a non-denominational church, thinking it meant she was rejecting him as her Godfather. They had a long discussion about this and, with Mom’s help, Dad came to a better understanding of that different perspective.

That is one reason I remain part of this thread, to come to a better understanding of the perspective that my daughter has, as well as other family members with different beliefs. I thank God that they are more accepting of my beliefs than some FReepers on this thread.


4,777 posted on 01/02/2015 8:41:09 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4756 | View Replies]

To: annalex

As is common in your posts on this thread, you ignore everything that determines what a passage means, to latch onto a falsehood. It has been demonstrated sufficiently for all objective readers.

Those whose mind was closed around an idea they brought to the passage were never open to the meaning of the passage.

As the saying goes, “Nothing is more dangerous than an idea, when you only have one idea.”

I did not expect you to treat the passage objectively. I’ve responded to and corrected your errors for the benefit of those who will read this exchange and who seek truth.

Thanks, and blessings to you in 2015.


4,778 posted on 01/02/2015 8:53:44 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion ( "I didn't leave the Central Oligarchy Party. It left me." - Ronaldus Maximus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4768 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion; annalex
As is common in your posts on this thread, you ignore everything that determines what a passage means, to latch onto a falsehood. It has been demonstrated sufficiently for all objective readers. Those whose mind was closed around an idea they brought to the passage were never open to the meaning of the passage. As the saying goes, “Nothing is more dangerous than an idea, when you only have one idea.” I did not expect you to treat the passage objectively. I’ve responded to and corrected your errors for the benefit of those who will read this exchange and who seek truth.

It seems to me you could just swap the to and from ids and your thoughts apply to yourself. I hope you have good works of Messiah to go with them in 2015, as I wish for us all.

4,779 posted on 01/02/2015 9:03:54 AM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4778 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

“It seems to me you could just swap the to and from ids and your thoughts apply to yourself. I hope you have good works of Messiah to go with them in 2015, as I wish for us all.”

The passage means what it means. I accept the argument, context, sentence structure and language. I accept the only conclusion.

Those who have been told what it means can only accept one idea they bring to the passage.


4,780 posted on 01/02/2015 9:16:47 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion ( "I didn't leave the Central Oligarchy Party. It left me." - Ronaldus Maximus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4779 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,741-4,7604,761-4,7804,781-4,800 ... 6,861-6,870 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson