[af_vet_1981]

As is common in your posts on this thread, you ignore everything that determines what a passage means, to latch onto a falsehood. It has been demonstrated sufficiently for all objective readers. Those whose mind was closed around an idea they brought to the passage were never open to the meaning of the passage. As the saying goes, “Nothing is more dangerous than an idea, when you only have one idea.” I did not expect you to treat the passage objectively. I’ve responded to and corrected your errors for the benefit of those who will read this exchange and who seek truth.

It seems to me you could just swap the to and from ids and your thoughts apply to yourself. I hope you have good works of Messiah to go with them in 2015, as I wish for us all.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

“It seems to me you could just swap the to and from ids and your thoughts apply to yourself. I hope you have good works of Messiah to go with them in 2015, as I wish for us all.”

The passage means what it means. I accept the argument, context, sentence structure and language. I accept the only conclusion.

Those who have been told what it means can only accept one idea they bring to the passage.