Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Luther In Rome
European Institute For Protestant Studies ^ | Dr Clive Gillis

Posted on 10/24/2014 8:52:18 AM PDT by Gamecock

AFTER many a weary league, Luther's feet stand at last within the gates of Rome. What now are his feelings? Is it a Paradise or a Pandemonium in which he is arrived?

The enchantment continued for some little while. Luther tried hard to realise the dreams which had lightened his toilsome journey. Here, thought Luther, the martyrs had died; on the floor of this stupendous ruin, the Coliseum, had they contended with the lions; on this spot, where now stands the sumptuous temple of St. Peter, and where the Vicar of Christ has erected his throne, were they used "as torches to illumine the darkness of the night". Over this city, too, Paul's feet had walked, and to this city had that letter been sent, and here had it first been opened and read, in which occur the words that had been the means of imparting to him a new life - "The just shall live by faith."

Profane levity

The first weeks which Luther passed in Rome were occupied in visiting the holy places and saying mass at the altars of the more holy of its churches. But it was not long till he began to see that these outward blemishes were as nothing to the hideous moral and spiritual corruptions that existed beneath the surface. The luxury, lewdness, and impiety that shocked him in the first Italian towns he had entered, and which had attended him in every step of his journey since crossing the Alps, were all repeated in Rome on a scale of seven-fold magnitude. His practice of saying mass at all the more favoured churches brought him into daily contact with the priests; he saw them behind the scenes; he heard their talk, and he could not conceal from himself - though the discovery unspeakably shocked and pained him - that these men were simply playing a part, and that in private they held in contempt and treated with mockery the very rites which in public they celebrated with so great a show of devotion. If he was shocked at their profane levity, they on their part were no less astonished at his solemn credulity, and jeered him as a dull German.

Panis es, et panis manebis

One day Luther was saying mass in one of the churches of Rome with his accustomed solemnity. While he had been saying one mass, the priests at the neighbouring altars had sung seven. "Make haste, and send Our Lady back her Son" was the horrible scoff with which they reproved his delay, as they accounted it. To them "Lady and Son" were worth only the money they brought. But these were the common priests. Surely, thought he, faith and piety still linger among the dignitaries of the Church! How mistaken was even this belief, Luther was soon to discover.

One day he chanced to find himself at table with some prelates. Taking the German to be a man of the same easy faith with themselves, they lifted the veil a little too freely. They openly expressed their disbelief in the mysteries of their Church, and shamelessly boasted of their cleverness in deceiving and befooling the people. Instead of the words, "Hoc est meum corpus" - This is my body etc. - the words at the utterance of which the bread is changed, as the Church of Rome teaches, into the flesh and blood of Christ - these prelates, as they themselves told him, were accustomed to say, "Panis es, et panis manebis," etc. - Bread thou art, and bread thou wilt remain - and then, said they, we elevate the Host, and the people bow down and worship.

Luther's horror

Luther was literally horrified: it was as if an abyss had suddenly yawned beneath him. But the horror was salutary; it opened his eyes. Instead of a city of prayers and alms, of contrite hearts and holy lives, Rome was full of mocking hypocrisy, defiant skepticism, jeering impiety, and shameless revelry. (Dr Gillis - Amongst the 100.000 population of Rome at this time there is documentary evidence there were 6,800 prostitutes walking the streets in their nun - like apparel).

Borgia had lately closed his infamous Pontificate, and the warlike Julius II. was now reigning. A powerful police patrolled the city every night. They were empowered to deal summary justice on offenders, and those whom they caught were hanged at the next post or thrown into the Tiber. But all the vigilance of the patrol could not secure the peace and safety of the streets. Robberies and murders were of nightly occurrence. "If there be a hell," said Luther, "Rome is built over it."

The Scala Sancta

One day he went, under the influence of these feelings, to the Church of the Lateran. There is the Scala Sancta, or Holy Stairs, which tradition says Christ descended on retiring from the hall of judgment, where Pilate had passed sentence upon him. These stairs are of marble, and the work of conveying them from Jerusalem to Rome was reported to have been undertaken and executed by the angels, who have so often rendered similar services to the Church - Our Lady's House at Loretto for example. The stairs so transported were enshrined in the Palace of the Lateran, and every one who climbs them on his knees merits an indulgence of fifteen years for each ascent.

Luther, who doubted neither the legend touching the stairs, nor the merit attached by the bulls of the Popes to the act of climbing them, went thither one day to engage in this holy act. He was climbing the steps in the appointed way, on his knees namely, earning at every step a year's indulgence, when he was startled by a sudden voice, which seemed as if it spoke from heaven, and said, "The just shall live by faith." Luther started to his feet in amazement. This was the third time these same words had been conveyed into his mind with such emphasis, that it was as if a voice of thunder had uttered them. It seemed louder than before, and he grasped more fully the great truth which it announced. What folly, thought he, to seek an indulgence from the Church, which can last me but a few years, when God sends me in his Word an indulgence that will last me for ever! How idle to toil at these performances, when God is willing to acquit me of all my sins not as so much wages for so much service, but freely, in the way of believing upon his Son! "The just shall live by faith."

The just shall live by faith

From this time the doctrine of justification by faith alone - in other words, salvation by free grace - stood out before Luther as the one great comprehensive doctrine of revelation. He held that it was by departing from this doctrine that the Church had fallen into bondage, and had come to groan under penances and works of self-righteousness. In no other way, he believed, could the Church find her way back to truth and liberty than by returning to this doctrine. This was the road to true reformation. This great article of Christianity was in a sense its fundamental article, and henceforward Luther began to proclaim it as eminently the Gospel - the whole Gospel in a single phrase. With relics, with privileged altars, with Pilate's Stairs, he would have no more to do; this one sentence, "The just shall live by faith," had more efficacy in it a thousand times over than all the holy treasures that Rome contained. It was the key that unlocked the closed gates of Paradise; it was the star that went before his face, and led him to the throne of a Saviour, there to find a free salvation. It needed but to re-kindle that old light in the skies of the Church, and a day, clear as that of apostolic times, would again shine upon her. This was what Luther now proposed doing.

The true City of God

This was what Luther learned at Rome. Verily, he believed, it was worth his long and toilsome journey thither to learn this one truth. Out of it were to come the life that would revive Christendom, the light that would illuminate it, and the holiness that would purify and adorn it. In that one doctrine lay folded the whole Reformation. "I would not have missed my journey to Rome," said Luther afterwards, "for a hundred thousand florins." When he turned his back on Rome, he turned his face toward the Bible. The Bible henceforward was to be to Luther the true city of God.

Taken from Wylie's History of Protestantism, and edited by Dr Clive Gillis


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Gamecock

Gamecock,

That’s the point. Luther (and following him, Bunyan) have it backwards.

If you are in Rome (Babylon), you need to cross the river to go to the Vatican.


41 posted on 10/25/2014 5:16:51 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
Well, he was Catholic trained and all.

Luther, as often, had Catholic company and his animosity was not novel, and thus your duplicity is inexcusable.

• The crucifiers of Christ ought to be held in continual subjection.(Pope Innocent III, “Epistle to the Hierarchy of France,” July 15, 1205)

• It would be licit, according to custom, to hold the Jews in perpetual servitude because of their crime. (St. Thomas Aquinas, “De Regimine Judaeorum”)

In The Popes Against the Jews : The Vatican's Role in the Rise of Modern Anti-Semitism, historian David Kertzer notes,

“the legislation enacted in the 1930s by the Nazis in their Nuremberg Laws and by the Italian Fascists with their racial laws—which stripped the Jews of their rights as citizens—was modeled on measures that the [Roman Catholic] Church itself had enforced for as long as it was in a position to do so” (9).

In 1466,

in festivities sponsored by Pope Paul II, Jews were made to race naked through the streets of the city. A particularly evocative later account describes them: “Races were run on each of the eight days of the Carnival by horses, asses and buffaloes, old men, lads, children, and Jews. Before they were to run, the Jews were richly fed, so as to make the race more difficult for them, and at the same time, more amusing for the spectators. They ran from the Arch of Domitian to the Church of St. Mark at the end of the Corso at full tilt, amid Rome’s taunting shrieks of encouragement and peals of laughter, while the Holy Father stood upon a richly ornamented balcony and laughed heartily. Two centuries later, these practices, now deemed indecorous and unbefitting the dignity of the Holy City, were stopped by Clement IX. In their place the Pope assessed a heavy tax on the Jews to help pay the costs of the city’s Carnival celebrations.

But various other Carnival rites continued. For many years the rabbis of the ghetto were forced to wear clownish outfits and march through the streets to the jeers of the crow, pelted by a variety of missiles. Such rites were not peculiar to Rome. In Pisa in the eighteenth century, for example, it was customary each year, as part of Carnival, for students to chase after the fattest Jew in the city, capture him, weigh him, and then make him give them his weight in sugar-coated almonds.

In 1779, Pius VI resurrected some of the Carnival rites that had been neglected in recent years. Most prominent among them was the feudal rite of homage, in which ghetto officials, made to wear special clothes, stood before an unruly mob in a crowded piazza, making an offering to Rome’s governors.

It was this practice that occasioned the formal plea from the ghetto to Pope Gregory XVI in 1836. The Jews argued that such rites should be abandoned, and cited previous popes who had ordered them halted. They asked that, in his mercy, the Pope now do the same. On November 5, the Pope met with his secretary of state to discuss the plea. A note on the secretary of state’s copy of the petition, along with his signature, records the Pope’s decision: “It is not opportune to make any innovation.” The annual rites continued.

“When all is said and done, the [Roman Catholic] Church’s claim of lack of responsibility for the kind of anti-Semitism that made the Holocaust possible comes down to this: The Roman Catholic Church never called for, or sanctioned, the mass murder of the Jews. Yes, the Jews should be stripped of their rights as equal citizens. Yes, they should be kept from contact with the rest of society. But Christian Charity and Christian theology forbade good Christians to round them up and murder them.”

See more in part 5 of a series (1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5, 6 .

Cum nimis absurdum was a papal bull issued by Pope Paul IV dated 14 July 1555. It takes its name from its first words:[1] "Since it is absurd and utterly inconvenient that the Jews, who through their own fault were condemned by God to eternal slavery..."

The bull revoked all the rights of the Jewish community and placed religious and economic restrictions on Jews in the Papal States, renewed anti-Jewish legislation and subjected Jews to various degradations and restrictions on their personal freedom.

The bull established the Roman Ghetto and required the Jews of Rome, which had existed as a community since before Christian times and numbered about 2,000 at the time, to live in it. The Ghetto was a walled quarter with three gates that were locked at night. Jews were also restricted to one synagogue per city. Under the bull, Jewish males were required to wear a pointed yellow hat, and Jewish females a yellow kerchief (see yellow badge). Jews were required to attend compulsory Catholic sermons on the Jewish shabbat.

The bull also subjected Jews to various other restrictions such as a prohibition on property ownership and practising medicine among Christians. Jews were allowed to practice only unskilled jobs, as rag men, secondhand dealers [2] or fish mongers. They could also be pawnbrokers.

Paul IV's successor, Pope Pius IV, enforced the creation of other ghettos in most Italian towns, and his successor, Pope Pius V, recommended them to other bordering states. The Papal States ceased to exist on 20 September 1870 when they were incorporated in the Kingdom of Italy, but the requirement that Jews live in the ghetto was only formally abolished by the Italian state in 1882. Though the Roman and other ghettos have now been abolished, the bull has never been revoked.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cum_nimis_absurdum

If RC want to invoke Luther and the Jews regarding his latter exasperated negativity, then they need to see to your own house. And Rome has been too partial toward the Muslims as regards the Promised land.

Meanwhile, though RCs imagine we look to Luther as a pope, evangelicals are the strongest supporters of the Jews, not simply or because of how they fit into a rapture expectation.


42 posted on 10/25/2014 7:24:27 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Luther, as often, had Catholic company and his animosity was not novel, and thus your duplicity is inexcusable.

I would not equate being factual with "duplicity". He was a German monk of the Augustinian order. He was a Catholic trained monk. Accept that or not.

43 posted on 10/26/2014 8:50:25 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Three things to send back to Africa: Aids, ebola and Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

Correct and please forgive: I was actually meaning to affirm what you said, but my content in that post was copied from one i had previously sent to a RC who repeatably indicted Luther for his latter words against Jews, while ignoring those of popes and other Catholics.

The “your duplicity is inexcusable” applied to that poster but should not have been included in the documentation sent to you affirming that indeed Luther was Catholic trained.


44 posted on 10/26/2014 10:16:13 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

We are in agreement.


45 posted on 10/26/2014 11:47:19 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Three things to send back to Africa: Aids, ebola and Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

If only Luther felt such love for his fellow man instead of exhorting them to exterminate them.


46 posted on 10/27/2014 3:27:15 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MamaB

Guess what? Luther was a man and not much of one, either.


47 posted on 10/27/2014 3:28:52 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Post some of Luther’s anti-Semitic rantings and get back to me.


48 posted on 10/27/2014 3:31:24 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Feel the same at about the Inquisition as I do about the pig, Luther.

How about you?


49 posted on 10/27/2014 3:34:09 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sakic; Gamecock
Post some from the List of Papal Bulls on Jewish Question , and see post #42 above, and how much evangelicals follow Luther on this vs. RCs follow popes, and get back to us.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/27/strong-support-for-israel-in-u-s-cuts-across-religious-lines/

50 posted on 10/27/2014 4:49:22 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

My point was that Luther was a POS.

Get back to me if you disagree.


51 posted on 10/27/2014 9:15:31 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: sakic

Luther was a product of his time and place, and he reflected the teachings he’d absorbed as an Augustinian monk. The Roman Catholic Church of that era was thoroughly corrupt, even yourself as an ardent defender of your faith would have to admit this, the historical records are just too voluminous with even RC sources agreeing upon this assessment.

Was Martin Luther perfect, sinless, infallible? No, and no one has claimed that he was. He was a sinner, hellhound but for the grace and forgiveness of God, just as every human being ever born has been, including every one of your popes, as well as Mary.

Attack him all you want, and you’ll still have not refuted the Reformation. It was much larger than just Martin Luther. Even if it wasn’t, he’s not a Protestant pope. Difficult to grasp for our more carnal and ritualistic brothers and sisters in Christ as that apparently is, he was not.


52 posted on 10/27/2014 9:23:19 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I am not a Catholic.

Your gibberish in regards to Luther is excused, moral relativism.

If Hitler accepted Jesus in his heart, he would be a current resident of heaven under your definition. Would he still be a POS or would you afford him the same consideration?


53 posted on 10/27/2014 11:19:06 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sakic

Gibberish? You’re atheist then. I’ve not excused any wrong committed by anyone. Here’s a suggestion, Luther died centuries ago, and here you are apparently filled with poison on account of something he wrote. Find it within yourself to forgive him and let it go. That doesn’t mean you accept his writings that were antisemitic. That is wrong whether you forgive or whether you’re consumed with anger and bitterness. Is he in Heaven? I can’t say. He believed in confessing his sins and asking forgiveness of God.

Hitler was a uniquely vile and evil man to the point that I’d say he was demonic. His garbled rationale involved socialism, fascism, nationalism, Norse Paganism and other occult beliefs, wrapped in a vaguely Christian sounding disguise. He had no love for the state church of Germany, he coopted and perverted everything he could about it. He had no love for any Christian church despite being born Catholic.

Your ire is seriously misdirected.


54 posted on 10/27/2014 12:07:39 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sakic

Why do you hate someone so much? He has been dead for centuries. He helped change the world for the better.


55 posted on 10/27/2014 2:29:11 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

The origin of this thread was praise for Luther. I explained why he is deserving of no one’s praise.

Jewish, not atheist.


56 posted on 10/28/2014 8:30:45 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson