Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
Luther, as often, had Catholic company and his animosity was not novel, and thus your duplicity is inexcusable.

I would not equate being factual with "duplicity". He was a German monk of the Augustinian order. He was a Catholic trained monk. Accept that or not.

43 posted on 10/26/2014 8:50:25 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Three things to send back to Africa: Aids, ebola and Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: BipolarBob

Correct and please forgive: I was actually meaning to affirm what you said, but my content in that post was copied from one i had previously sent to a RC who repeatably indicted Luther for his latter words against Jews, while ignoring those of popes and other Catholics.

The “your duplicity is inexcusable” applied to that poster but should not have been included in the documentation sent to you affirming that indeed Luther was Catholic trained.


44 posted on 10/26/2014 10:16:13 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson