My point was that Luther was a POS.
Get back to me if you disagree.
Luther was a product of his time and place, and he reflected the teachings he’d absorbed as an Augustinian monk. The Roman Catholic Church of that era was thoroughly corrupt, even yourself as an ardent defender of your faith would have to admit this, the historical records are just too voluminous with even RC sources agreeing upon this assessment.
Was Martin Luther perfect, sinless, infallible? No, and no one has claimed that he was. He was a sinner, hellhound but for the grace and forgiveness of God, just as every human being ever born has been, including every one of your popes, as well as Mary.
Attack him all you want, and you’ll still have not refuted the Reformation. It was much larger than just Martin Luther. Even if it wasn’t, he’s not a Protestant pope. Difficult to grasp for our more carnal and ritualistic brothers and sisters in Christ as that apparently is, he was not.