Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did the Pope (John Paul II) REALLY kiss the Koran?
Dangus -- Vanity

Posted on 12/13/2011 9:55:16 PM PST by dangus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: Jonty30; Alex Murphy
In my mind there can be no union between orthodoxy and Islam -- but between those who reject orthodoxy, we can read what the Ottoman sultan Murad III said to the Calvinist groups in Flanders and elsewhere in the 1574
"As you, for your part, do not worship idols, you have banished the idols and portraits and "bells" from churches, and declared your faith by stating that God Almighty is one and Holy Jesus is His Prophet and Servant, and now, with heart and soul, are seeking and desirous of the true faith; but the faithless one they call Pope does not recognize his Creator as One, ascribing divinity to Holy Jesus (upon him be peace!).."
The Ottoman sultan knew who would eventually unite with Islam -- as we saw in the Battle of Vienna in 1683 when Catholic Austria, Hungary, Poland etc. fought against Islamic Turks united with the Hungarian Calvinists
61 posted on 12/14/2011 7:01:48 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

The official Adventist postion on the identity of Christ is pretty Orthodox.

He is fully God and fully man and through Him and His sacrifice, I am saved.

Some Adventists, who claim they are Historical Adventists, reject Christ being God. However, the church’s position shouldn’t be problematic as far as the identity of Christ is concerned.


62 posted on 12/14/2011 7:05:21 AM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
It is easy to mistake fake stories in articles like kissing green books and others in the articles you post, sorry.

Thank you for always posting only jokes as articles which are good for a laugh -- hoaxes like the "TV Evangelists Unite to Beam Gospel to the Stars"

63 posted on 12/14/2011 7:09:47 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Are you sure about that? because their prophet Ellen G White claimed that Jesus was Archangel Michael and IS Mikey now

She wrote that
“The man Christ Jesus was not the Lord God Almighty” (ms 140, SDA Commentary V, p. 1129).

If you read the SDA’s 1994 Clear Word Bible they have made Jesus Michael the Archangel in 1st Thessalonians 4:16; Revelation 12:7 and Jude 9; and to make Him to be a mighty angel in Revelation 10:1,5,8 & 10

he SDA, Clear Word Bible perverts Jude 1:9...

Jude 1:9 King James Bible - "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee."

Clear Word Bible - "In contrast to these ungodly men is the Lord Jesus Christ, also called Michael, the archangel in charge of the entire angelic host. When He was challenged by Satan about His intentions to resurrect Moses, He didn't come against Satan with a blistering attack nor did he belittle him. He simply said, 'God rejects your claim to his body.'"

64 posted on 12/14/2011 7:15:16 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
And more about what Ellen the prophet of the SDA's preached

Ellen G. White preached

"Michael, or Christ, with the angels that buried Moses..." (Jude 9, Spiritual Gifts, IV a, p. 158)

"And before the context closed Christ Himself came to Gabriel's aid--Gabriel declares 'But lo, Michael, one of the Chief Princes came to help me" (Daniel 10:13, Prophets & Kings, p.572)

"There is none that holdeth with me in these things but Michael (Christ) your prince." (Desire of Ages, p.99)

65 posted on 12/14/2011 7:17:01 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

The name Michael means, “One who is like God”, which can be interpreted as “One, who is God.”

The term angel means messenger. Arch-angel means the “Main Messenger.”

Put it together and what do you have?

The Main Messenger who is like God (or who is God).

Who does that sound like to you?

Not expecting, just explaining. :)


66 posted on 12/14/2011 7:18:23 AM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Here is a more indepth explanation for you to read.

http://www.adventistbiblicalresearch.org/Biblequestions/jesusothername.htm


67 posted on 12/14/2011 7:21:49 AM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Michael isn't God

Jesus Christ is/was/will always be God while Michael is an angel -- an Archangel yes, but a created being nonetheless.

And actually note that Michael is atually a question not a statement --> the Hebrew name מִיכָאֵל (Mikha'el) means "who is like God?"

68 posted on 12/14/2011 7:34:11 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30; vladimir998; dangus

to say that Jesus is actually the incarnation of Michael the Arch angel and resumed the name when he ascended into heaven leads to polytheism and puts forth the wrong notion that Jesus and the Father are two separate gods.


69 posted on 12/14/2011 7:35:40 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

We all can’t agree on everything. I’m not here to convince anybody of anything, but I will explain anything I do believe and why I believe it.

Hope that’s cool.


70 posted on 12/14/2011 7:36:18 AM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30; vladimir998; dangus

Finally — Michael is “who is like God?” — that is also the meaning of Micah — but to claim that the prophet Micah is God too is silly.


71 posted on 12/14/2011 7:36:51 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30; dangus; magritte; vladimir998

oh, no worries — if you wish to believe that Archangel Michael is Jesus Christ, that is your right to interpret. I was just pointing out that that Adventist belief coupled with your prophet Ellen White’s statements that Jesus Christ is not God do indicate a move away from the belief in Christ’s divinity.


72 posted on 12/14/2011 7:54:08 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: dangus

That was then...this is now.


73 posted on 12/14/2011 8:18:17 AM PST by exPBRrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Do not use a reference to another Freeper, personally, to identify a group of believers. That is making the thread "about" him. It is "making it personal."

Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.

74 posted on 12/14/2011 8:30:00 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
i'm not referring to any particular post at all -- I was simply passing a link to a thread that spoke about the links between various groups and Islam -- what any other poster may say they believe in is their own word.
75 posted on 12/14/2011 8:34:34 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

It was not the link but the use of the term “AM” to define the group both on post 58 and 50.


76 posted on 12/14/2011 8:38:41 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

ok — won’t mention the Assembly Mennonite Church again.


77 posted on 12/14/2011 8:40:33 AM PST by Cronos (Nuke Mecca and Medina now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: 7MMmag; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; count-your-change; ...

It took years after the event for it to come to light that it wasn’t a koran?

I don’t think so. If it wasn’t, it should have and would have been corrected at the time and it wasn’t.

Fail.....


78 posted on 12/14/2011 9:27:44 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: metmom

That was exactly my thoughts all along. They did not immediately make sure people knew what it was exactly and that spoke volumes to me. I’m don’t recall the vatican denying it being the Koran to this date but could have missed it.


79 posted on 12/14/2011 9:35:29 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 7MMmag

Pope John Paul II has been beatified. He can now be addressed as “Blessed” John Paul II, Pope.”


80 posted on 12/14/2011 9:58:28 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson