Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: 7MMmag; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; count-your-change; ...

It took years after the event for it to come to light that it wasn’t a koran?

I don’t think so. If it wasn’t, it should have and would have been corrected at the time and it wasn’t.

Fail.....


78 posted on 12/14/2011 9:27:44 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

That was exactly my thoughts all along. They did not immediately make sure people knew what it was exactly and that spoke volumes to me. I’m don’t recall the vatican denying it being the Koran to this date but could have missed it.


79 posted on 12/14/2011 9:35:29 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: metmom; 1000 silverlings; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; count-your-change; Gamecock; ...
It took years after the event for it to come to light that it wasn’t a koran?

The most-often heard apologetic at the time was that the Pope may not have known it was a Koran when he kissed it. Now we're hearing that (maybe) it wasn't even a Koran at all.

Does this mean that JPII didn't know it wasn't a Koran when he kissed it?

83 posted on 12/14/2011 10:54:54 AM PST by Alex Murphy (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2703506/posts?page=518#518)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson