Intended Catholic Dictatorship

Independent Individualist ^ | 8/27/10 | Reginald Firehammer

[OLD REGGIE]

reading it over, she said the magic was in her remaining a virgin after the birth.

Too many beers could have affected his reading comprehension. :-)

[wagglebee]

If Roman Catholics don't want people thinking they are liberal-loving socialists, they should stop agreeing with liberal-loving socialists and voting for them.

The theme of THIS THREAD is that the Catholic Church wants to reunite Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Belgium, Poland, the Czech Republic and various other parts of Eastern Europe into a dictatorial monarchy. YOU are talking about Catholics being socialists, perhaps YOU should go start a thread on THAT topic because you are way off base on this thread.

[Jaded]

BLAH,BLAH,BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. Are you suppose to be cute?

[Dr. Eckleburg]

Well, that's a surprise. I didn't criticize anyone personally. I'd like to know where my comment broke the rules.

"We've been through this kind of lying before. RC apologists can't argue from Scripture, so they rewrite other people's comments and then discuss those fictitious rewrites."

I made that statement because Roman Catholic apologists had just rewritten my comment and responded to their own rewrite of my statement as if I had written it which is common practice among some RC apologists.

As I said, that is a pathetic way to argue.

As I pointed out earlier, from the viewpoint of a Jew there is no Scriptural support for Christianity.

Then good thing neither of us is a Jew.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

Fascism and socialism go hand-in-hand. The “dictatorial monarchy” of Rome is both.

[1000 silverlings]

if that’s the theme then one might wish to stick to it instead of trying to interpret ancient Jewish Law. just sayin’

[wagglebee]

Well, that's a surprise. I didn't criticize anyone personally.

As I said before, I am happy to have you not believe me.

I made that statement because Roman Catholic apologists had just rewritten my comment and responded to their own rewrite of my statement as if I had written it which is common practice among some RC apologists.

I didn't rewrite your comment at all, the ONLY change I made was to point out which portion was metmom's.

As I said, that is a pathetic way to argue.

Asking you a question about something you wrote is "pathetic"?

[1000 silverlings]

oh my, is someone’s ox gored

[OLD REGGIE]

The fact is that quantitatively more Protestants voted for obama than Catholics did. When you have an election in which zero Protestants vote Democrat then you can start boasting. Until then it is simply hubris.

What an absolutely stupid reply. 10 on a scale of 0-10.

Now for another (deliberately) stupid remark:

Many more Catholics voted Communist in Italy than Protestants did.

(The fact that Catholics greatly outnumber Protestants is not trlevant.) "Quantitatively" is the only relevant factor.

[Natural Law]

"We've been through this kind of lying before."

Did you think that by cobbling together a dubious explanation you got to repost an objectionable post that had been deleted?

I'm pretty sure the mod gets to have the last word no matter how much it kills you not to be able to.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

Calvin, Spurgeon and the Reformation are all grounded on the firm foundation of Scripture. If it isn't in the Bible, it is not to be preached as Christian truth. (And yes, the concept of the Trinity is in the Bible.)

"Tradition" is whatever Rome says it is at the time it says it.

[Natural Law]

"What an absolutely stupid reply. 10 on a scale of 0-10"

The fact remains that even if 100% of Catholics had voted for Obama he would have still required a significant percentage of Protestants to win. No single group has clean hands.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

lol. Any club in the bag will do when all you want to do is throw it. 8~)

[OLD REGGIE]

The fact is that quantitatively more Protestants voted for obama than Catholics did. When you have an election in which zero Protestants vote Democrat then you can start boasting. Until then it is simply hubris.

What an absolutely stupid reply. 10 on a scale of 0-10.

Now for another (deliberately) stupid remark:

Many more Catholics voted Communist in Italy than Protestants did.

(The fact that Catholics greatly outnumber Protestants is not trlevant.) "Quantitatively" is the only relevant factor.

[wagglebee]

Fascism and socialism go hand-in-hand.

Fascism IS socialism.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

No, asking me a question about something you wrote and passed off as mine is pathetic.

[1000 silverlings]

Really? I wonder why the Catholic church has been so eager to support it in various places?

[Legatus]

If Roman Catholics don't want people thinking they are liberal-loving socialists, they should stop agreeing with liberal-loving socialists and voting for them.

Thank you for providing such an excellent example of why Republicans have so much trouble getting the Catholic vote. It's the old "if they talk about us like this to our faces how do they talk about us behind our backs" thing.

[1000 silverlings]

why look at that! back to “the theme” of this thread!

[Dr. Eckleburg]

WAGGLEBEE: from the viewpoint of a Jew there is no Scriptural support for Christianity.

1000 SILVERLINGS: well then explain why so many Jews have converted to Christianity

That is a GREAT question.