As I said before, I am happy to have you not believe me.
I made that statement because Roman Catholic apologists had just rewritten my comment and responded to their own rewrite of my statement as if I had written it which is common practice among some RC apologists.
I didn't rewrite your comment at all, the ONLY change I made was to point out which portion was metmom's.
As I said, that is a pathetic way to argue.
Asking you a question about something you wrote is "pathetic"?
No, asking me a question about something you wrote and passed off as mine is pathetic.